Migration of Rhipicephalus microplus ticks among cattle.


Journal

Medical and veterinary entomology
ISSN: 1365-2915
Titre abrégé: Med Vet Entomol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8708682

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2023
Historique:
received: 14 02 2022
accepted: 20 10 2022
medline: 18 5 2023
pubmed: 12 11 2022
entrez: 11 11 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim of this work was to quantitatively analyse the magnitude of the migration of Rhipicephalus microplus ticks among cattle under field conditions, in groups of bovines with different stocking rates. The role of this phenomenon in the epidemiology of Anaplasma marginale has been discussed. Cattle naturally infested with R. microplus (donors) and cattle non-infested with R. microplus (recipients) were clustered for 13 days into two groups with low and high stocking rates (G1 and G2 respectively). The initial prevalence of infestation (infested cattle / total cattle) was 20% in both groups. Adult migratory ticks from donor to recipient cattle were recorded by examination of the recipient cattle on days 2, 6, 9, and 13. The tick infestation rate, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier survival test, was higher in G2 (p = 0.05). The cumulative incidence on day 13 was 25% in G1 and 65% in G2, with no significant differences. The results demonstrate that migration of adults of R. microplus under field conditions occurs, in accordance with previous studies, and that its magnitude is associated with the stocking rate. These results highlight the relevance of R. microplus in the epidemiology of A. marginale through its role as a vector in the intrastadial transmission of this pathogen of cattle.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36367458
doi: 10.1111/mve.12625
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

418-421

Informations de copyright

© 2022 Royal Entomological Society.

Références

Aguirre, D.H., Gaido, A.B., Viñabal, A.E., Echaide, S.T.d. & Guglielmone, A.A. (1994) Transmission of Anaplasma marginale with adult Boophilus microplus ticks fed as nymphs on calves with different levels of rickettsaemia. Parasite, 1, 405-407.
Bennett, G.F. (1974) Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) (acaridae: Ixodidae) on the bovine host. I. Mortality during the developmental cycle. Acarologia, 16, 643-650.
Connell, M.L. & Hall, W.T. (1972) Transmission of Anaplasma marginale by the cattle tick Boophilus microplus. Australian Veterinary Journal, 48, 477.
Esteves, E., Pohl, P.C., Klafke, G.M., Reck, J., Fogaça, A.C., Martins, J.R. et al. (2015) Low temperature affects cattle tick reproduction but does not lead to transovarial transmission of Anaplasma marginale. Veterinary Parasitology, 214, 322-326.
Futse, J.E., Ueti, M.W., Knowles, D.P., Jr. & Palmer, G.H. (2003) Transmission of Anaplasma marginale by Boophilus microplus: retention of vector competence in the absence of vector-pathogen interaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 41, 3829-3834.
Guglielmone, A.A. (1992) The level of infestation with the vector of cattle babesiosis in Argentina. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 87, 133-137.
Guglielmone, A.A. (1995) Epidemiology of babesiosis and anaplasmosis in south and Central America. Veterinary Parasitology, 57, 109-119.
Hitchcock, L.F. (1955) Studies on the non-parasitic stages of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) (Acarina: Ixodidae). Australian Journal of Zoology, 3, 295-311.
Kocan, K.M., de la Fuente, J., Blouin, E.F., Coetzee, J.F. & Ewing, S.A. (2010) The natural history of Anaplasma marginale. Veterinary Parasitology, 167, 95-107.
Leatch, G. (1973) Preliminary studies in the transmission of Anaplasma marginale by Boophilus microplus. Australian Veterinary Journal, 49, 16-19.
Little, S.E., Hostetler, J. & Kocan, K.M. (2007) Movement of Rhipicephalus sanguineus adults between co-housed dogs during active feeding. Veterinary Parasitology, 150, 139-145.
Lysyk, T.J. (2013) Movement of mal Dermacentor andersoni (Acari: Ixodidae) among cattle. Journal of Medical Entomology, 50, 977-985.
Mason, C.A. & Norval, R.A.I. (1981) The transfer of Boophilus microplus (Acarina: Ixodidae) from infested to uninfested cattle under field conditions. Veterinary Parasitology, 8, 185-188.
Mazzucco-Panizza, M., Cutulle, C., Primo, M.E., Morel, N., Sebastian, P.S. & Nava, S. (2022) Assays to evaluate the transovarial transmission of Anaplasma marginale by Rhipicephalus microplus. Veterinary Parasitology, 311, 109808.
Nuñez, J.L., Muñoz Cobeñas, M. & Moltedo, H. (1982) Boophilus microplus: La Garrapata Común del Ganado Vacuno. Buenos Aires: Hemisferio Sur.
Potgieter, F. (1979) Epizootiology and control of anaplasmosis in South Africa. The Journal of the South African Veterinary Association, 50, 367-372.
Potgieter, F.T. & Stoltsz, W.H. (2004) Bovine anaplasmosis. In: Coetze, J.A.W. & Tustin, R.C. (Eds.) Infectious diseases of livestock. Cape Town: Oxford University Press, pp. 594-616.
Ruiz, P.M.G., Passos, L.M.F. & Barbosa Ribeiro, M.F. (2005) Lack of infectivity of a Brazilian Anaplasma marginale isolate for Boophilus microplus ticks. Veterinary Parasitology, 128, 325-331.
Scoles, G., Ueti, M.W., Noh, S.M., Knowles, D.P. & Palmer, G.H. (2007) Conservation of transmission phenotype of Anaplasma marginale (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) strains among Dermacentor and Rhipicephalus ticks (Acari: Ixodidae). Journal of Medical Entomology, 44, 484-491.
Stiller, D., Coan, M.E., Goff, W.L., Johnson, L.W. & McGuire, T.C. (1989) The importance and putative role of Dermacentor spp. males in anaplasmosis epidemiology: transmission of Anaplasma marginale to cattle by ad libitum interhost transfer of D. andersoni males under semi-natural conditions. Proceedings of Eighth National Veterinary Hemoparasite Disease Conference St. Louis, MO, p 209.
Thompson, K.C. & Roa, E.J.C. (1978) Transmisión de Anaplasma marginale por la garrapata Boophilus microplus. Revista ICA, 13, 131-134.
Uilenberg, G. (1970) Notes sur les babesioses et l'anaplasmose des bovins à Madagascar. IV. Note additionnelle sur la transmission. Revue d'Élevage et de Médecine Vétérinaire des Pays Tropicaux, 23, 309-312.

Auteurs

Matilde N Mazzucco Panizza (MN)

Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea (IDICAL, INTA- CONICET), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela (INTA E.E.A. Rafaela), Rafaela, Argentina.

Maria V Rossner (MV)

Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benítez, Colonia Benítez, Chaco, Argentina.

Marcelo L Signorini (ML)

Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea (IDICAL, INTA- CONICET), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela (INTA E.E.A. Rafaela), Rafaela, Argentina.

Santiago Nava (S)

Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea (IDICAL, INTA- CONICET), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela (INTA E.E.A. Rafaela), Rafaela, Argentina.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH