Slow development of woodland vegetation and bird communities during 33 years of passive rewilding in open farmland.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
19
05
2022
accepted:
28
10
2022
entrez:
11
11
2022
pubmed:
12
11
2022
medline:
16
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Passive rewilding is a potential tool for expanding woodland cover and restoring biodiversity by abandoning land management and allowing natural vegetation succession to occur. Land can be abandoned to passive rewilding deliberately or due to socio-economic change. Despite abandonment being a major driver of land use change, few have studied the long-term outcomes for vegetation and biodiversity in Western Europe. Studies are also biased towards sites that are close to seed sources and favourable to woodland colonisation. In this case-study, we reconstruct a time series of passive rewilding over 33 years on 25 ha of former farmland that had been subject to soil tipping, far from woodland seed sources. Natural colonisation by shrubs and trees was surveyed at three points during the time series, using field mapping and lidar. Breeding birds were surveyed at three time points, and compared with surveys from nearby farmland. Results showed that natural colonisation of woody vegetation was slow, with open grassland dominating the old fields for two decades, and small wetlands developing spontaneously. After 33 years, thorny shrub thickets covered 53% of the site and former hedgerows became subsumed or degraded, but trees remained scarce. However, the resulting habitat mosaic of shrubland, grassland and wetland supported a locally distinctive bird community. Farmland bird species declined as passive rewilding progressed, but this was countered by relatively more wetland birds and an increase in woodland birds, particularly songbirds, compared to nearby farmland. Alongside biodiversity benefits, shrubland establishment by passive rewilding could potentially provide ecosystem services via abundant blossom resources for pollinators, and recreation and berry-gathering opportunities for people. Although closed-canopy woodland remained a distant prospect even after 33 years, the habitat mosaic arising from passive rewilding could be considered a valuable outcome, which could contribute to nature recovery and provision of ecosystem services.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36367885
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277545
pii: PONE-D-22-14588
pmc: PMC9651571
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0277545Subventions
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : NE/N018125/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2022 Broughton et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 15;119(7):
pubmed: 35131937
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Oct 22;373(1761):
pubmed: 30348878
Sci Adv. 2018 May 16;4(5):eaas9143
pubmed: 29774239
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 16;16(6):e0252466
pubmed: 34133452
Ecol Appl. 2020 Jan;30(1):e02007
pubmed: 31544280
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 3;12(2):e0171368
pubmed: 28158256
Trends Ecol Evol. 2016 Jun;31(6):453-462
pubmed: 26987771
Science. 2019 Apr 26;364(6438):
pubmed: 31023897
Nat Commun. 2021 Nov 2;12(1):6217
pubmed: 34728617
PeerJ. 2019 Jan 14;6:e6219
pubmed: 30656068
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Dec 23;287(1941):20201811
pubmed: 33323075