Clinical course of pharyngotonsillitis with group A streptococcus treated with different penicillin V strategies, divided in groups of Centor Score 3 and 4: a prospective study in primary care.


Journal

BMC infectious diseases
ISSN: 1471-2334
Titre abrégé: BMC Infect Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968551

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Nov 2022
Historique:
received: 21 04 2022
accepted: 01 11 2022
entrez: 11 11 2022
pubmed: 12 11 2022
medline: 16 11 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Sore throat is a common reason for prescribing antibiotics in primary care, and 10 days of treatment is recommended for patients with pharyngotonsillitis with group A streptococcus (GAS). Our group recently showed that penicillin V (PcV) four times daily for 5 days was non-inferior in clinical outcome to PcV three times daily for 10 days. This study compares duration, intensity of symptoms, and side effects in patients with a Centor Score (CS) of 3 or 4 respectively, after treatment with PcV for 5 or 10 days and evaluates whether all patients with pharyngotonsillitis with a CS of 3 or 4 should be treated for 5 days or if severity of symptoms or CS suggest a longer treatment period. Data on symptoms and recovery from patient diaries from 433 patients included in a RCT comparing PcV 800 mg × 4 for 5 days or PcV 1 g × 3 for 10 days was used. Patients six years and older with CS-3 or CS-4 and positive rapid antigen detection test for GAS-infection were grouped based on CS and randomized treatment. Comparisons for categorical variables were made with Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. Patients with CS-3 as well as patients with CS-4 who received PcV 800 mg × 4 for 5 days self-reported that they recovered earlier compared to patients with CS-3 or CS-4 who received treatment with PcV 1 g × 3 for 10 days. In addition, the throat pain as single symptom was relieved 1 day earlier in patients with CS-4 and 5 days of treatment compared to patients with CS-4 and 10 days of treatment. No differences in side effects between the groups were found. Intense treatment with PcV four times a day for 5 days seems clinically beneficial and strengthens the suggestion that the 4-dose regimen with 800 mg PcV for 5 days may be the future treatment strategy for GAS positive pharyngotonsillitis irrespectively of CS-3 or CS-4. Trail registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02712307 (3 April 2016).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Sore throat is a common reason for prescribing antibiotics in primary care, and 10 days of treatment is recommended for patients with pharyngotonsillitis with group A streptococcus (GAS). Our group recently showed that penicillin V (PcV) four times daily for 5 days was non-inferior in clinical outcome to PcV three times daily for 10 days. This study compares duration, intensity of symptoms, and side effects in patients with a Centor Score (CS) of 3 or 4 respectively, after treatment with PcV for 5 or 10 days and evaluates whether all patients with pharyngotonsillitis with a CS of 3 or 4 should be treated for 5 days or if severity of symptoms or CS suggest a longer treatment period.
METHOD METHODS
Data on symptoms and recovery from patient diaries from 433 patients included in a RCT comparing PcV 800 mg × 4 for 5 days or PcV 1 g × 3 for 10 days was used. Patients six years and older with CS-3 or CS-4 and positive rapid antigen detection test for GAS-infection were grouped based on CS and randomized treatment. Comparisons for categorical variables were made with Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS RESULTS
Patients with CS-3 as well as patients with CS-4 who received PcV 800 mg × 4 for 5 days self-reported that they recovered earlier compared to patients with CS-3 or CS-4 who received treatment with PcV 1 g × 3 for 10 days. In addition, the throat pain as single symptom was relieved 1 day earlier in patients with CS-4 and 5 days of treatment compared to patients with CS-4 and 10 days of treatment. No differences in side effects between the groups were found.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Intense treatment with PcV four times a day for 5 days seems clinically beneficial and strengthens the suggestion that the 4-dose regimen with 800 mg PcV for 5 days may be the future treatment strategy for GAS positive pharyngotonsillitis irrespectively of CS-3 or CS-4. Trail registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02712307 (3 April 2016).

Identifiants

pubmed: 36368940
doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07830-4
pii: 10.1186/s12879-022-07830-4
pmc: PMC9652839
doi:

Substances chimiques

Penicillin V Z61I075U2W

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02712307']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

840

Subventions

Organisme : Futurum - Akademin för Hälsa och Vård, Region Jönköpings läns
ID : Futurum - 937705
Organisme : Folkhälsomyndigheten
ID : 05262-2020

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

BMJ. 2019 Oct 4;367:l5337
pubmed: 31585944
BMJ. 2013 Oct 10;347:f5806
pubmed: 24114306
BMJ. 2003 Dec 6;327(7427):1324
pubmed: 14656841
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Oct 26;9(11):
pubmed: 33114471
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015 Jun;34(6):557-61
pubmed: 25973933
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Apr;34(4):953-8
pubmed: 8815115
BMJ. 2000 Jan 15;320(7228):150-4
pubmed: 10634735
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Sep;67(662):e623-e633
pubmed: 28808076
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Oct 1;73(10):2883-2892
pubmed: 29955785
J Infect Dis. 2003 Nov 15;188(10):1578-86
pubmed: 14624385
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Aug;47(8):2658-61
pubmed: 19515840
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Jul 26;76(12 Suppl 2):ii7-ii13
pubmed: 34312654
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;(8):CD004872
pubmed: 22895944
Scand J Infect Dis. 1988;20(1):37-46
pubmed: 3129780
Lancet. 2005 Feb 12-18;365(9459):579-87
pubmed: 15708101
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015 Mar;21(3):263.e1-7
pubmed: 25658556
Med Decis Making. 1981;1(3):239-46
pubmed: 6763125
Drug Resist Updat. 2011 Apr;14(2):107-17
pubmed: 21440486
J Infect. 2014 Jan;68(1):50-7
pubmed: 23999149
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 Feb;69(2):117-22
pubmed: 21251553
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 05;(11):CD000023
pubmed: 24190439
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Mar 19;12(3):e0006335
pubmed: 29554121
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 9;12:CD000023
pubmed: 34881426
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Nov 25;16(1):709
pubmed: 27887585
Am J Dis Child. 1987 Feb;141(2):224-7
pubmed: 3101484
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Apr;18 Suppl 1:1-28
pubmed: 22432746

Auteurs

David Tell (D)

Futurum, Region Jönköping County, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. david.tell@rjl.se.

Mia Tyrstrup (M)

Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Family Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Charlotta Edlund (C)

Unit for Antibiotics and Infection Control, The Public Health Agency of Sweden, Solna, Sweden.

Karin Rystedt (K)

General Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Research, Education, Development & Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Centre for Antibiotic Resistance Research (CARe) at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Gunilla Skoog Ståhlgren (G)

Unit for Antibiotics and Infection Control, The Public Health Agency of Sweden, Solna, Sweden.

Pär-Daniel Sundvall (PD)

General Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Research, Education, Development & Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Centre for Antibiotic Resistance Research (CARe) at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Katarina Hedin (K)

Futurum, Region Jönköping County, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Family Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH