Perspectives of physicians and medical assistants on the implementation of NAAT-based point-of-care testing for SARS-CoV-2 in primary care in Germany.
COVID-19
Implementation
Implementierung
Medical staff perspective
Perspektive des medizinischen Personals
Point-of-Care-Tests
Point-of-care testing
Primary care
Primärversorgung
SARS-CoV-2
Journal
Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen
ISSN: 2212-0289
Titre abrégé: Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101477604
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
11
02
2022
revised:
19
08
2022
accepted:
09
09
2022
pubmed:
14
11
2022
medline:
21
12
2022
entrez:
13
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Given their high diagnostic accuracy and fast turnaround time, rapid SARS-CoV-2 tests based on nucleic acid amplification technologies (NAAT) have great potential to expand access to testing and decrease delays in diagnosis of COVID-19. The aim of this study was to investigate feasibility, acceptance, organizational consequences and other implementation aspects of the use of a NAAT-based SARS-CoV-2 rapid test (ID NOW™ COVID-19, Abbott Diagnostics) for symptomatic primary care patients with a suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cross-sectional survey among primary care physicians and medical assistants from Thuringia (Germany) during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in March and April 2021. The health care providers surveyed had previously used the NAAT-based SARS-CoV-2 rapid test as part of a pilot study. Eleven physicians (ten general practitioners and one paediatrician) and 22 medical assistants from Thuringia (Germany) participated in the written survey. Four physicians were additionally interviewed. The majority of the surveyed health care providers rated user-friendliness, integration into practice routine, impact on communication with patients and technical reliability of the NAAT-based SARS-CoV-2 rapid test as (very) positive. Greater workload and the costs for measuring devices were identified as disadvantages compared to PCR laboratory tests. Four out of ten physicians rated the lower sample turnover as unfavourable. Our survey shows that NAAT-based point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 testing gained widespread acceptance among physicians and medical assistants, positively influences workflows, can improve patient communication and could therefore be successfully implemented into routine primary care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36372644
pii: S1865-9217(22)00173-8
doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.09.006
pmc: PMC9648907
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
43-49Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier GmbH.
Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 24;3:CD013705
pubmed: 33760236
Mol Cell Probes. 2021 Aug;58:101742
pubmed: 33971264
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jul;128:104429
pubmed: 32425657
Bioanalysis. 2021 Aug;13(15):1213-1223
pubmed: 34289741
Am J Clin Pathol. 2021 Jan 4;155(1):69-78
pubmed: 33015712
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9
pubmed: 18313558
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 1;7(9):e015760
pubmed: 28864692
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;108:592-602
pubmed: 34015523
Am J Clin Pathol. 2021 Aug 4;156(3):370-380
pubmed: 34302455
Can J Anaesth. 2021 Nov;68(11):1659-1667
pubmed: 34292525
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jan 28;22(3):
pubmed: 33525651