Artificial intelligence-generated hip radiological measurements are fast and adequate for reliable assessment of hip dysplasia : an external validation study.
Artificial intelligence
Centre-edge angle
Deep learning
Hip dysplasia
Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC)
Radiographs
femoral head
hip radiological measurements
hips
lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA)
osteoarthritis
pelvic obliquity
pelvis
radiographs
Journal
Bone & joint open
ISSN: 2633-1462
Titre abrégé: Bone Jt Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101770336
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Nov 2022
Historique:
entrez:
14
11
2022
pubmed:
15
11
2022
medline:
15
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Hip dysplasia (HD) leads to premature osteoarthritis. Timely detection and correction of HD has been shown to improve pain, functional status, and hip longevity. Several time-consuming radiological measurements are currently used to confirm HD. An artificial intelligence (AI) software named HIPPO automatically locates anatomical landmarks on anteroposterior pelvis radiographs and performs the needed measurements. The primary aim of this study was to assess the reliability of this tool as compared to multi-reader evaluation in clinically proven cases of adult HD. The secondary aims were to assess the time savings achieved and evaluate inter-reader assessment. A consecutive preoperative sample of 130 HD patients (256 hips) was used. This cohort included 82.3% females (n = 107) and 17.7% males (n = 23) with median patient age of 28.6 years (interquartile range (IQR) 22.5 to 37.2). Three trained readers' measurements were compared to AI outputs of lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA), caput-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle, pelvic obliquity, Tönnis angle, Sharp's angle, and femoral head coverage. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses were obtained. Among 256 hips with AI outputs, all six hip AI measurements were successfully obtained. The AI-reader correlations were generally good (ICC 0.60 to 0.74) to excellent (ICC > 0.75). There was lower agreement for CCD angle measurement. Most widely used measurements for HD diagnosis (LCEA and Tönnis angle) demonstrated good to excellent inter-method reliability (ICC 0.71 to 0.86 and 0.82 to 0.90, respectively). The median reading time for the three readers and AI was 212 (IQR 197 to 230), 131 (IQR 126 to 147), 734 (IQR 690 to 786), and 41 (IQR 38 to 44) seconds, respectively. This study showed that AI-based software demonstrated reliable radiological assessment of patients with HD with significant interpretation-related time savings.Cite this article:
Identifiants
pubmed: 36373773
doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.311.BJO-2022-0125.R1
pmc: PMC9709495
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
877-884Références
J Orthop Sci. 2003;8(2):264-71
pubmed: 12665970
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Feb;44(2):211-8
pubmed: 15479751
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2015 Jun 13;2(3):280-6
pubmed: 27011850
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Nov;90 Suppl 4:47-66
pubmed: 18984718
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):396-405
pubmed: 27172819
J Rheumatol. 2013 Sep;40(9):1583-9
pubmed: 23858046
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jan 6;98(1):63-73
pubmed: 26738905
Clin Anat. 1997;10(5):318-23
pubmed: 9283729
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1981 Sep-Oct;6(5):510-21
pubmed: 6458101
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1234-46
pubmed: 25384429
Stat Methods Med Res. 1999 Jun;8(2):135-60
pubmed: 10501650