Adverse events following administration of COVID-19 vaccines in Saudi Arabia.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 11 2022
15 11 2022
Historique:
received:
21
06
2022
accepted:
01
11
2022
entrez:
15
11
2022
pubmed:
16
11
2022
medline:
19
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Previous studies investigated the frequency of different adverse events of COVID-19 vaccines. However, this study compares these adverse events between the two main COVID-19 vaccines used in Saudi Arabia (Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca) using telemedicine technology. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 958 individuals, 7 days after receiving either Pfizer-BioNTech or Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines during June 2021. Immediate adverse events were reported by 1.04% and 2.09% for Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines, respectively, with no serious events. Recipients of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine had a higher percentage of local adverse events (24.8% versus 9.8% in AstraZeneca vaccine). The most common reported systemic adverse events in both vaccines respectively were general fatigue (23.1% and 25.1%), fever (18.5% and 27.2%), myalgia (20.6% and 20.3%), and headache (15.2% and 17.2%). No significant difference was recorded between both vaccines regarding overall systemic adverse events; however, they were more frequent following the first dose of AstraZeneca vaccine compared to Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, while the reverse was observed for the second dose. Adverse events were more frequent in females and younger age groups for both vaccines. Most of systemic and local adverse events were mild in nature. Further cohort studies are recommended to investigate the long-term adverse events of COVID-19 vaccines.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36379996
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23471-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-23471-8
pmc: PMC9664034
doi:
Substances chimiques
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
19551Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;21(7):939-949
pubmed: 33930320
Lancet. 2021 Jan 9;397(10269):99-111
pubmed: 33306989
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7830):589-593
pubmed: 32785213
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Apr 19;14:1389-1401
pubmed: 33907443
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 1;22(9):e19338
pubmed: 32790642
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 May 26;9(6):
pubmed: 34073382
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jun 18;9(6):
pubmed: 34207394
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2014 Aug;34(3):597-613, ix
pubmed: 25017679
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 01;10(7):
pubmed: 33916020
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 08;9(11):
pubmed: 34828563
Acta Biomed. 2021 Oct 19;92(S6):e2021487
pubmed: 34739452
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Oct 11;24:101595
pubmed: 34976653
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jun 01;9(6):
pubmed: 34205917
NPJ Vaccines. 2019 Sep 24;4:39
pubmed: 31583123
Infect Dis Poverty. 2021 Jul 05;10(1):94
pubmed: 34225791
Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):1979-1993
pubmed: 33220855
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 07;19(14):
pubmed: 35886139
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2021 Sep-Oct;43:102119
pubmed: 34133965
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;110:359-362
pubmed: 34320413
Lancet. 2021 Apr 17;397(10283):1441-1443
pubmed: 33798498
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615
pubmed: 33301246
Life (Basel). 2021 Mar 17;11(3):
pubmed: 33803014
Nature. 2021 Jul;595(7868):572-577
pubmed: 34044428
Biology (Basel). 2021 Aug 05;10(8):
pubmed: 34439984