Perceptions of, and Obstacles to, SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Among Adults in Lebanon: Cross-sectional Online Survey.

COVID-19 Lebanon SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus health care system misinformation public health vaccination vaccine acceptance vaccine hesitancy

Journal

JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Dec 2022
Historique:
received: 26 01 2022
accepted: 14 09 2022
revised: 06 04 2022
pubmed: 17 11 2022
medline: 17 11 2022
entrez: 16 11 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The COVID-19 pandemic is an additional burden on Lebanon's fragmented health care system and adds to its ongoing political, economic, and refugee crises. Vaccination is an important means of reducing the impact of the pandemic. Our study's aims were to (1) assess the prevalences of intention to vaccinate and vaccine hesitancy in Lebanon; (2) determine how vaccine hesitancy in Lebanon varies by sociodemographic, economic, and geographic characteristics; and (3) understand individuals' motivations for vaccinating as well as concerns and obstacles to vaccination. We performed a cross-sectional study from January 29, 2021, to March 11, 2021, using an online questionnaire of open- and closed-ended questions in Arabic via convenience "snowball" sampling to assess the perceptions of adults residing in Lebanon. Of the 1185 adults who participated in the survey, 46.1% (95% CI: 43.2%-49.0%) intended to receive the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine when available to them, 19.0% (95% CI 16.8%-21.4%) indicated they would not, and 34.0% (95% CI 31.3%-36.8%) were unsure (with an additional 0.9% skipping this question). The most common reasons for hesitancy were concerns about safety, limited testing, side effects, and efficacy. Top motivations for vaccinating were to protect oneself, protect one's family and the public, and end the pandemic. Despite financial hardships in Lebanon, barriers to vaccine access were not frequently described as concerns. Established health care facilities, rather than new temporary vaccination centers, were most frequently selected as preferred vaccination sites. Vaccine hesitancy appears to be high in Lebanon. Disseminating clear, consistent, evidence-based safety and efficacy information on vaccines may help reduce vaccine hesitancy, especially among the large proportion of adults who appear to be unsure about (rather than opposed to) vaccination.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 pandemic is an additional burden on Lebanon's fragmented health care system and adds to its ongoing political, economic, and refugee crises. Vaccination is an important means of reducing the impact of the pandemic.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
Our study's aims were to (1) assess the prevalences of intention to vaccinate and vaccine hesitancy in Lebanon; (2) determine how vaccine hesitancy in Lebanon varies by sociodemographic, economic, and geographic characteristics; and (3) understand individuals' motivations for vaccinating as well as concerns and obstacles to vaccination.
METHODS METHODS
We performed a cross-sectional study from January 29, 2021, to March 11, 2021, using an online questionnaire of open- and closed-ended questions in Arabic via convenience "snowball" sampling to assess the perceptions of adults residing in Lebanon.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of the 1185 adults who participated in the survey, 46.1% (95% CI: 43.2%-49.0%) intended to receive the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine when available to them, 19.0% (95% CI 16.8%-21.4%) indicated they would not, and 34.0% (95% CI 31.3%-36.8%) were unsure (with an additional 0.9% skipping this question). The most common reasons for hesitancy were concerns about safety, limited testing, side effects, and efficacy. Top motivations for vaccinating were to protect oneself, protect one's family and the public, and end the pandemic. Despite financial hardships in Lebanon, barriers to vaccine access were not frequently described as concerns. Established health care facilities, rather than new temporary vaccination centers, were most frequently selected as preferred vaccination sites.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Vaccine hesitancy appears to be high in Lebanon. Disseminating clear, consistent, evidence-based safety and efficacy information on vaccines may help reduce vaccine hesitancy, especially among the large proportion of adults who appear to be unsure about (rather than opposed to) vaccination.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36383635
pii: v6i12e36827
doi: 10.2196/36827
pmc: PMC9762140
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e36827

Informations de copyright

©Nadeem Elias Abou-Arraj, Diana Maddah, Vanessa Buhamdan, Roua Abbas, Nadine Kamel Jawad, Fatima Karaki, Nael H Alami, Pascal Geldsetzer. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 14.12.2022.

Références

Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jun;174(6):882-885
pubmed: 33556267
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022 Jan 11;15:21-45
pubmed: 35046661
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Mar;2:100044
pubmed: 34173633
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Nov 20;13:1657-1663
pubmed: 33262600
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 27;21(1):998
pubmed: 34044790
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 6;21(1):653
pubmed: 33823826
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 4;12(1):29
pubmed: 33397962
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Dec;24:101606
pubmed: 34692378
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Dec 15;173(12):964-973
pubmed: 32886525
Vaccines (Basel). 2020 Dec 30;9(1):
pubmed: 33396832
Vaccine. 2019 Jul 9;37(30):4177-4183
pubmed: 31221562
Nat Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):225-228
pubmed: 33082575
J Community Health. 2021 Jun;46(3):487-493
pubmed: 32661861
Int Health. 2019 Nov 13;11(6):568-579
pubmed: 31089721
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2021 May;15(3):361-370
pubmed: 33605010
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Dec 05;12(12):15486-97
pubmed: 26690189
Epidemiol Infect. 2021 Nov 02;149:e242
pubmed: 34726141
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Mar 03;9(3):
pubmed: 33802285
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Feb 16;9(2):
pubmed: 33669441
Med Princ Pract. 2021;30(3):262-271
pubmed: 33486492
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jan 12;9(1):
pubmed: 33445581
Fam Pract. 2011 Dec;28(6):632-7
pubmed: 21746697
Vaccines (Basel). 2017 Aug 12;5(3):
pubmed: 28805672
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Apr;6(4):e210-e221
pubmed: 33556325
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 15;11(6):e048172
pubmed: 34130963
JAMA. 2020 Aug 11;324(6):548-549
pubmed: 32722763

Auteurs

Nadeem Elias Abou-Arraj (NE)

School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Diana Maddah (D)

School of Health Sciences, Modern University for Business and Science, Beirut, Lebanon.

Vanessa Buhamdan (V)

School of Health Sciences, Modern University for Business and Science, Beirut, Lebanon.

Roua Abbas (R)

School of Health Sciences, Modern University for Business and Science, Beirut, Lebanon.

Nadine Kamel Jawad (NK)

Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.

Fatima Karaki (F)

Refugee and Asylum Seeker Health Initiative (RAHI), Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Nael H Alami (NH)

School of Health Sciences, Modern University for Business and Science, Beirut, Lebanon.

Pascal Geldsetzer (P)

Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Classifications MeSH