Ginkgo biloba for tinnitus.


Journal

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
ISSN: 1469-493X
Titre abrégé: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100909747

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 11 2022
Historique:
entrez: 16 11 2022
pubmed: 17 11 2022
medline: 19 11 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Tinnitus is a symptom defined as the perception of sound in the absence of an external source. In England alone there are an estimated ¾ million general practice consultations every year where the primary complaint is tinnitus, equating to a major burden on healthcare services. Clinical management strategies include education and advice, relaxation therapy, tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT), cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), sound enrichment using ear-level sound generators or hearing aids, and drug therapies to manage co-morbid symptoms such as insomnia, anxiety or depression.  OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of Ginkgo biloba for tinnitus in adults and children. The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Register; CENTRAL (2022, Issue 6); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; CINAHL; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 7 June 2022. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting adults and children with acute or chronic subjective tinnitus. We included studies where the intervention involved Ginkgo biloba and this was compared to placebo, no intervention, or education and information. Concurrent use of other medication or other treatment was acceptable if used equally in each group. Where an additional intervention was used equally in both groups, we analysed this as a separate comparison. The review included all courses of Ginkgo biloba, regardless of dose regimens or formulations, and for any duration of treatment. We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were tinnitus symptom severity measured as a global score on a multi-item tinnitus questionnaire and serious adverse effects (bleeding, seizures). Our secondary outcomes were tinnitus loudness (change in subjective perception), tinnitus intrusiveness, generalised depression, generalised anxiety, health-related quality of life and other adverse effects (gastrointestinal upset, headache, allergic reaction). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. This review included 12 studies (with a total of  1915 participants). Eleven studies compared the effects of Ginkgo biloba with placebo and one study compared the effects of Ginkgo biloba with hearing aids to hearing aids alone. All included studies were parallel-group RCTs. In general, risk of bias was high or unclear due to selection bias and poor reporting of allocation concealment and blinding of participants, personnel and outcome assessments. Due to heterogeneity in the outcomes measured and measurement methods used, only limited data pooling was possible.  Ginkgo biloba versus placebo When we pooled data from two studies for the primary outcome tinnitus symptom severity, we found that Ginkgo biloba may have little to no effect (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory scores) at three to six months compared to placebo, but the evidence is very uncertain (mean difference (MD) -1.35 (scale 0 to 100), 95% confidence interval (CI) -8.26 to 5.55; 2 studies; 85 participants) (very low-certainty). Ginkgo biloba may result in little to no difference in the risk of bleeding or seizures, with no serious adverse effects reported in either group (4 studies; 1154 participants; low-certainty). For the secondary outcomes, one study found that there may be little to no difference between the effects of Ginkgo biloba and placebo on tinnitus loudness measured with audiometric loudness matching at 12 weeks, but the evidence is very uncertain (MD -4.00 (scale -10 to 140 dB), 95% CI -13.33 to 5.33; 1 study; 73 participants) (very low-certainty). One study found that there may be little to no difference between the effects of Ginkgo biloba and placebo on health-related quality of life measured with the Glasgow Health Status Inventory at three months (MD -0.58 (scale 0 to 100), 95% CI -4.67 to 3.51; 1 study; 60 participants) (low-certainty). Ginkgo biloba may not increase the frequency of other adverse effects (gastrointestinal upset, headache, allergic reaction) at three months compared to placebo (risk ratio 0.91, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.60; 4 studies; 1175 participants) (low-certainty). None of the studies reported the other secondary outcomes of tinnitus intrusiveness or changes in depressive symptoms or depression, anxiety symptoms or generalised anxiety. Gingko biloba with concurrent intervention versus concurrent intervention only One study compared Ginkgo biloba with hearing aids to hearing aids only. It assessed the mean difference in the change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory scores and tinnitus loudness using a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) at three months. The study did not report adverse effects, tinnitus intrusiveness, changes in depressive symptoms or depression, anxiety symptoms or generalised anxiety, or health-related quality of life. This was a single, very small study (22 participants) and for all outcomes the certainty of the evidence was very low. We were unable to draw meaningful conclusions from the numerical results. There is uncertainty about the benefits and harms of Ginkgo biloba for the treatment of tinnitus when compared to placebo. We were unable to draw meaningful conclusions regarding the benefits and harms of Ginkgo biloba when used with concurrent intervention (hearing aids). The certainty of the evidence for the reported outcomes, assessed using GRADE, ranged from low to very low. Future research into the effectiveness of Ginkgo biloba in patients with tinnitus should use rigorous methodology. Randomisation and blinding should be of the highest quality, given the subjective nature of tinnitus and the strong likelihood of a placebo response. The CONSORT statement should be used in the design and reporting of future studies. We also recommend the use of validated, patient-centred outcome measures for research in the field of tinnitus.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Tinnitus is a symptom defined as the perception of sound in the absence of an external source. In England alone there are an estimated ¾ million general practice consultations every year where the primary complaint is tinnitus, equating to a major burden on healthcare services. Clinical management strategies include education and advice, relaxation therapy, tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT), cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), sound enrichment using ear-level sound generators or hearing aids, and drug therapies to manage co-morbid symptoms such as insomnia, anxiety or depression.  OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of Ginkgo biloba for tinnitus in adults and children.
SEARCH METHODS
The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Register; CENTRAL (2022, Issue 6); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; CINAHL; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 7 June 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting adults and children with acute or chronic subjective tinnitus. We included studies where the intervention involved Ginkgo biloba and this was compared to placebo, no intervention, or education and information. Concurrent use of other medication or other treatment was acceptable if used equally in each group. Where an additional intervention was used equally in both groups, we analysed this as a separate comparison. The review included all courses of Ginkgo biloba, regardless of dose regimens or formulations, and for any duration of treatment.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were tinnitus symptom severity measured as a global score on a multi-item tinnitus questionnaire and serious adverse effects (bleeding, seizures). Our secondary outcomes were tinnitus loudness (change in subjective perception), tinnitus intrusiveness, generalised depression, generalised anxiety, health-related quality of life and other adverse effects (gastrointestinal upset, headache, allergic reaction). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome.
MAIN RESULTS
This review included 12 studies (with a total of  1915 participants). Eleven studies compared the effects of Ginkgo biloba with placebo and one study compared the effects of Ginkgo biloba with hearing aids to hearing aids alone. All included studies were parallel-group RCTs. In general, risk of bias was high or unclear due to selection bias and poor reporting of allocation concealment and blinding of participants, personnel and outcome assessments. Due to heterogeneity in the outcomes measured and measurement methods used, only limited data pooling was possible.  Ginkgo biloba versus placebo When we pooled data from two studies for the primary outcome tinnitus symptom severity, we found that Ginkgo biloba may have little to no effect (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory scores) at three to six months compared to placebo, but the evidence is very uncertain (mean difference (MD) -1.35 (scale 0 to 100), 95% confidence interval (CI) -8.26 to 5.55; 2 studies; 85 participants) (very low-certainty). Ginkgo biloba may result in little to no difference in the risk of bleeding or seizures, with no serious adverse effects reported in either group (4 studies; 1154 participants; low-certainty). For the secondary outcomes, one study found that there may be little to no difference between the effects of Ginkgo biloba and placebo on tinnitus loudness measured with audiometric loudness matching at 12 weeks, but the evidence is very uncertain (MD -4.00 (scale -10 to 140 dB), 95% CI -13.33 to 5.33; 1 study; 73 participants) (very low-certainty). One study found that there may be little to no difference between the effects of Ginkgo biloba and placebo on health-related quality of life measured with the Glasgow Health Status Inventory at three months (MD -0.58 (scale 0 to 100), 95% CI -4.67 to 3.51; 1 study; 60 participants) (low-certainty). Ginkgo biloba may not increase the frequency of other adverse effects (gastrointestinal upset, headache, allergic reaction) at three months compared to placebo (risk ratio 0.91, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.60; 4 studies; 1175 participants) (low-certainty). None of the studies reported the other secondary outcomes of tinnitus intrusiveness or changes in depressive symptoms or depression, anxiety symptoms or generalised anxiety. Gingko biloba with concurrent intervention versus concurrent intervention only One study compared Ginkgo biloba with hearing aids to hearing aids only. It assessed the mean difference in the change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory scores and tinnitus loudness using a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) at three months. The study did not report adverse effects, tinnitus intrusiveness, changes in depressive symptoms or depression, anxiety symptoms or generalised anxiety, or health-related quality of life. This was a single, very small study (22 participants) and for all outcomes the certainty of the evidence was very low. We were unable to draw meaningful conclusions from the numerical results.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is uncertainty about the benefits and harms of Ginkgo biloba for the treatment of tinnitus when compared to placebo. We were unable to draw meaningful conclusions regarding the benefits and harms of Ginkgo biloba when used with concurrent intervention (hearing aids). The certainty of the evidence for the reported outcomes, assessed using GRADE, ranged from low to very low. Future research into the effectiveness of Ginkgo biloba in patients with tinnitus should use rigorous methodology. Randomisation and blinding should be of the highest quality, given the subjective nature of tinnitus and the strong likelihood of a placebo response. The CONSORT statement should be used in the design and reporting of future studies. We also recommend the use of validated, patient-centred outcome measures for research in the field of tinnitus.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36383762
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013514.pub2
pmc: PMC9668350
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

CD013514

Subventions

Organisme : NCCIH NIH HHS
ID : R24 AT001293
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Références

Front Syst Neurosci. 2012 May 08;6:31
pubmed: 22586375
J Am Acad Audiol. 2000 Mar;11(3):115-24
pubmed: 10755808
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 17;11(6):e0157574
pubmed: 27315063
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jan 1;136(1):42-53
pubmed: 11777363
PLoS Med. 2005 Jun;2(6):e153
pubmed: 15971936
Medwave. 2018 Oct 17;18(6):e7295
pubmed: 30339143
Hear Res. 2006 Nov;221(1-2):59-64
pubmed: 16962270
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1989 Mar 17;101(6):198-200
pubmed: 2652887
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 16;11:CD013514
pubmed: 36383762
Arzneimittelforschung. 2007;57(1):4-11
pubmed: 17341003
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 May-Jun;82(3):269-74
pubmed: 26547700
Ear Hear. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):153-76
pubmed: 22156949
Brain Res. 2010 Jun 25;1342:24-32
pubmed: 20438718
Behav Neurosci. 1988 Dec;102(6):811-22
pubmed: 3214530
Ear Hear. 1990 Dec;11(6):434-45
pubmed: 2073977
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 3;108(18):7601-6
pubmed: 21502491
HNO. 2019 Mar;67(Suppl 1):10-42
pubmed: 30847513
Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2009;69(2):217-31
pubmed: 19593336
Brain. 2003 Oct;126(Pt 10):2235-45
pubmed: 12847078
Trends Amplif. 2008 Sep;12(3):170-87
pubmed: 18628281
Planta Med. 2004 Nov;70(11):1052-7
pubmed: 15549661
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:441-7
pubmed: 21857784
J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Feb;34(1):197-201
pubmed: 2008074
Hear Res. 2013 Jan;295:79-86
pubmed: 22504034
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332
pubmed: 20332509
J Comp Eff Res. 2016 Mar;5(2):193-205
pubmed: 26930385
Int J Audiol. 2004 Jul-Aug;43(7):410-6
pubmed: 15515640
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518814384
pubmed: 30488765
J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2007 Jul-Sep;25(3):211-44
pubmed: 17763047
Presse Med. 1986 Sep 25;15(31):1562-4
pubmed: 2947100
Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45(1):12-9
pubmed: 26182874
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1999 Jun;24(3):164-7
pubmed: 10384838
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005 Nov;1056:474-85
pubmed: 16387710
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2012;30(2):137-59
pubmed: 22414611
Int J Audiol. 2015 Apr;54(4):249-56
pubmed: 25470623
Cardiovasc Drug Rev. 2004 Winter;22(4):309-19
pubmed: 15592576
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Dec;132(12):1323-30
pubmed: 17178943
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Apr 11;16(1):61
pubmed: 29642913
BMJ. 2001 Jan 13;322(7278):73
pubmed: 11154618
Hear Res. 1998 Nov;125(1-2):98-108
pubmed: 9833964
Integr Med Insights. 2015 Nov 09;10:1-9
pubmed: 26604665
Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):375-84
pubmed: 11491197
Eur J Neurosci. 2006 Jun;23(11):3124-38
pubmed: 16820003
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Oct;48(5):1204-35
pubmed: 16411806
J Neurosci. 2005 Jan 19;25(3):699-705
pubmed: 15659607
Nature. 2011 Feb 3;470(7332):101-4
pubmed: 21228773
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2013 Mar;36(1):73-83
pubmed: 23538078
Pharmacol Res. 2009 Jul;60(1):68-73
pubmed: 19427589
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Nov;22(8):e557-63
pubmed: 23871729
Qual Life Res. 2004 Mar;13(2):299-310
pubmed: 15085902
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Apr;35(5):1089-109
pubmed: 21094182
J Neurol Sci. 2009 Aug 15;283(1-2):224-9
pubmed: 19286192
Phytother Res. 2019 Nov;33(11):2821-2840
pubmed: 31429152
J Neurosci. 2003 May 1;23(9):3944-52
pubmed: 12736364
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Nov;71(Suppl 2):1523-1528
pubmed: 31750210
J Neurosci. 2010 Jul 14;30(28):9578-87
pubmed: 20631186
Brain. 2009 Feb;132(Pt 2):524-36
pubmed: 19036764
Eval Health Prof. 2011 Dec;34(4):413-20
pubmed: 21177640
Health Econ. 1993 Oct;2(3):217-27
pubmed: 8275167
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Dec;56(6):893-7
pubmed: 3204199
Noise Health. 2009 Jul-Sep;11(44):156-60
pubmed: 19602769
Int J Audiol. 2011 May;50(5):303-12
pubmed: 21388238
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1996;253(1-2):25-30
pubmed: 8932425
Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 1995;49:101-4
pubmed: 7653339
Hear Res. 2006 Dec;222(1-2):1-15
pubmed: 17071031
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996 Feb;122(2):143-8
pubmed: 8630207
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23:56-62
pubmed: 14399272
J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Oct;104(4):2314-25
pubmed: 10491696
Aging Dis. 2017 Dec 1;8(6):812-826
pubmed: 29344418
Hear Res. 2012 Jan;283(1-2):98-106
pubmed: 22085487
Hear Res. 2001 Feb;152(1-2):43-54
pubmed: 11223280
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 31;(1):CD010151
pubmed: 24482186
J Psychosom Res. 1992 May;36(4):337-48
pubmed: 1593509
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Oct;151(4):533-41
pubmed: 25274374
J Neurosci. 2010 Nov 10;30(45):14972-9
pubmed: 21068300
J Food Sci. 2008 Jan;73(1):R14-9
pubmed: 18211362
J Neurosci. 2011 Sep 21;31(38):13452-7
pubmed: 21940438
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013 Sep;52(9):727-49
pubmed: 23703577
Hear Res. 2001 Aug;158(1-2):95-101
pubmed: 11506941
Int J Otolaryngol. 2010;2010:265861
pubmed: 20652075
Trends Neurosci. 2004 Nov;27(11):676-82
pubmed: 15474168
Brain. 2002 Mar;125(Pt 3):524-37
pubmed: 11872610
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004 Jun;29(3):226-31
pubmed: 15142066
J Nutr Biochem. 2011 Sep;22(9):886-94
pubmed: 21190826
Biochem Pharmacol. 2003 Aug 15;66(4):679-89
pubmed: 12906932
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Jul 05;10:735
pubmed: 31333457
J Laryngol Otol. 2013 Feb;127(2):134-41
pubmed: 23318104
J Ethnopharmacol. 1996 Mar;50(3):131-9
pubmed: 8691847
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):CD003120
pubmed: 17443523
J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2017 Jan 2;35(1):1-28
pubmed: 28055331
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Nov 04;11:302
pubmed: 22053947
Audiology. 1994 Mar-Apr;33(2):85-92
pubmed: 8179518
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018 Aug;45(4):680-685
pubmed: 29042071
Lancet. 2012 May 26;379(9830):1951-9
pubmed: 22633033
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Aug;24 Suppl 1:S21-4
pubmed: 22784424
Hear Res. 2016 Jul;337:70-9
pubmed: 27246985
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;(3):CD003852
pubmed: 23543524
Neuroradiology. 2011 Mar;53(3):185-91
pubmed: 21061003
Neurotherapeutics. 2019 Jul;16(3):666-674
pubmed: 31376068
Curr Drug Targets. 2000 Jul;1(1):25-58
pubmed: 11475535
J Ethnopharmacol. 1991 Apr;32(1-3):135-9
pubmed: 1881152
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Aug;17(4):684-92
pubmed: 21707872
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1988 Dec;13(6):501-2
pubmed: 3228994
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Nov - Dec;86(6):734-742
pubmed: 31300303
Fortschr Med. 1988 Jun 30;106(19):408-12
pubmed: 3061905
Lancet. 2013 Nov 9;382(9904):1600-7
pubmed: 23827090
Arzneimittelforschung. 1990 May;40(5):589-93
pubmed: 2383302
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013 Jun;46(3):389-408
pubmed: 23764817
Otol Neurotol. 2007 Sep;28(6):828-33
pubmed: 17450108
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 13;18(1):110
pubmed: 29433479
Neuron. 2010 Jun 24;66(6):819-26
pubmed: 20620868
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 06;6:32400
pubmed: 27597117
Trends Neurosci. 1999 Feb;22(2):74-80
pubmed: 10092047
Neurosci Res. 1990 Aug;8(4):221-54
pubmed: 2175858
J Clin Neurol. 2009 Mar;5(1):11-9
pubmed: 19513328
Am J Audiol. 2017 Sep 18;26(3):338-346
pubmed: 28841725
Clin Interv Aging. 2018 Jun 13;13:1121-1127
pubmed: 29942120
Chin Med J (Engl). 2007 May 20;120(10):922-8
pubmed: 17543184
Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 1995;49:105-8
pubmed: 7653340
Hear Res. 2003 Jun;180(1-2):28-38
pubmed: 12782350
Int Tinnitus J. 2000;6(1):56-62
pubmed: 14689620
Biomed Pharmacother. 2018 Jul;103:989-1001
pubmed: 29710516
Eur J Med Chem. 2019 Aug 15;176:68-91
pubmed: 31096120
Behav Res Ther. 1986;24(1):1-8
pubmed: 3947307
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Mar;75(3):603-18
pubmed: 22670731
Health News. 2003 Jan;9(1):12
pubmed: 12545957
Hear Res. 2009 Jul;253(1-2):15-31
pubmed: 19364527
Am J Audiol. 2016 Sep 1;25(3):184-205
pubmed: 27681261
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Aug 18;95(17):10340-3
pubmed: 9707649
Neural Plast. 2014;2014:427298
pubmed: 25028612

Auteurs

Magdalena Sereda (M)

NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Hearing Sciences, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Jun Xia (J)

Nottingham China Health Institute, The University of Nottingham Ningbo, Ningbo, China.

Polly Scutt (P)

NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Hearing Sciences, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Malcolm P Hilton (MP)

ENT Department, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK.

Amr El Refaie (A)

Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Derek J Hoare (DJ)

NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Hearing Sciences, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH