Walking a mile in Grandma's shoes - medical students' evaluation of a very simple online aging game to enhance their understanding of older patients.

Aging game Aging simulation Geriatric medicine Online teaching Undergraduate medical education

Journal

BMC geriatrics
ISSN: 1471-2318
Titre abrégé: BMC Geriatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968548

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 11 2022
Historique:
received: 15 02 2022
accepted: 20 09 2022
entrez: 17 11 2022
pubmed: 18 11 2022
medline: 22 11 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Aging simulation games are established educational interventions to make older patients' perspectives noticeable, raise awareness about their needs, and positively influence attitudes toward older adults. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions imposed on education, we replaced a classroom-based aging simulation course with a simple online equivalent. This consisted of short introductory screencasts, four downloadable Portable Document Format (PDF) files containing issue-specific audio and video links, quizzes, case studies, and prompts for reflection. We explored how well our self-directed simple online simulation succeeded in providing students with relevant insights and experiences, raising awareness about age-related difficulties, and enhancing understanding of older patients. In this cross-sectional study, an anonymous post hoc online survey was conducted among 277 5th-year medical students eligible for the course at the Leipzig University in May 2020. The questionnaire addressed overall course evaluations, assessments of the individual PDF components (working enjoyment, personal insights, professional learning gain, enhanced understanding, increased interest in working with older patients), and students' main insights from the course (free text). Descriptive statistical and qualitative content analyses were performed. The response rate was 92.4% (n = 256, mean age 25.7 ± 3.4 years, 59.8% women). Nearly all respondents reported that the course was well structured, easily understandable, and that processing was intuitive. The majority (82.8%) perceived the course as practice-oriented, 88.3% enjoyed processing, 60.3% reported having gained new professional knowledge, and 75.4% had new personal insights. While only 14.8% agreed that the online course could generally replace the real-world simulation, 71.1% stated that it enabled them to change their perspective and 91.7% reported enhanced understanding of older patients. PDF components containing audio and video links directly imitating conditions (visual or hearing impairment) were rated highest. Qualitative data revealed manifold insights on the part of the students, most frequently referring to aspects of professional doctor-patient interaction, knowledge about conditions and diseases, role reversal, and enhanced empathy. Simple online aging simulations may be suitable to provide students with relevant insights and enhance their understanding of older patients. Such simulations could be alternatively implemented in health professionals' education where resources are limited.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Aging simulation games are established educational interventions to make older patients' perspectives noticeable, raise awareness about their needs, and positively influence attitudes toward older adults. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions imposed on education, we replaced a classroom-based aging simulation course with a simple online equivalent. This consisted of short introductory screencasts, four downloadable Portable Document Format (PDF) files containing issue-specific audio and video links, quizzes, case studies, and prompts for reflection. We explored how well our self-directed simple online simulation succeeded in providing students with relevant insights and experiences, raising awareness about age-related difficulties, and enhancing understanding of older patients.
METHODS
In this cross-sectional study, an anonymous post hoc online survey was conducted among 277 5th-year medical students eligible for the course at the Leipzig University in May 2020. The questionnaire addressed overall course evaluations, assessments of the individual PDF components (working enjoyment, personal insights, professional learning gain, enhanced understanding, increased interest in working with older patients), and students' main insights from the course (free text). Descriptive statistical and qualitative content analyses were performed.
RESULTS
The response rate was 92.4% (n = 256, mean age 25.7 ± 3.4 years, 59.8% women). Nearly all respondents reported that the course was well structured, easily understandable, and that processing was intuitive. The majority (82.8%) perceived the course as practice-oriented, 88.3% enjoyed processing, 60.3% reported having gained new professional knowledge, and 75.4% had new personal insights. While only 14.8% agreed that the online course could generally replace the real-world simulation, 71.1% stated that it enabled them to change their perspective and 91.7% reported enhanced understanding of older patients. PDF components containing audio and video links directly imitating conditions (visual or hearing impairment) were rated highest. Qualitative data revealed manifold insights on the part of the students, most frequently referring to aspects of professional doctor-patient interaction, knowledge about conditions and diseases, role reversal, and enhanced empathy.
CONCLUSION
Simple online aging simulations may be suitable to provide students with relevant insights and enhance their understanding of older patients. Such simulations could be alternatively implemented in health professionals' education where resources are limited.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36384454
doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03470-0
pii: 10.1186/s12877-022-03470-0
pmc: PMC9667442
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

865

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Jan;51(1):136-49
pubmed: 23384695
Fam Med. 1998 Jan;30(1):15-8
pubmed: 9460610
Med Educ Online. 2019 Dec;24(1):1666538
pubmed: 31526248
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64
pubmed: 26447007
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 May;88(5):342-9
pubmed: 20461138
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Nov;46(11):1425-30
pubmed: 9809767
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Jul;61(7):1188-96
pubmed: 23750821
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Oct;58(10):1987-93
pubmed: 20840458
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2018 Jul;6(3):123-129
pubmed: 30013996
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Jun 25;79(5):65
pubmed: 26396274
JMIR Med Educ. 2020 Jul 17;6(2):e20190
pubmed: 32634107
Fam Pract. 2021 Nov 24;38(6):793-801
pubmed: 34160614
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006 May;7(4):224-9
pubmed: 16698508
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Sep 01;10(3):e26
pubmed: 18762473
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Jan;54(1):144-9
pubmed: 16420212
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Feb 8;17(1):35
pubmed: 28178954
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2011 Feb;44(1):48-54
pubmed: 20809282
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 30;(6):CD005314
pubmed: 26123126
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 12;16:126
pubmed: 27067255
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1980 Aug;28(8):341-5
pubmed: 7400502
JAMA. 1989 Sep 15;262(11):1507-9
pubmed: 2769902
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Feb 04;11:127-32
pubmed: 26893549
Health Info Libr J. 2007 Dec;24(4):233-45
pubmed: 18005298
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jun 02;15:52
pubmed: 27255464
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Jan-Feb;12(1):83-7
pubmed: 24445110
Simul Healthc. 2015 Oct;10(5):308-19
pubmed: 26426561
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Jan;35(1):38-43
pubmed: 24912741
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Jun 05;15:101
pubmed: 26043772
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 12;9:2124
pubmed: 30483174
J Family Med Prim Care. 2016 Jan-Mar;5(1):34-41
pubmed: 27453840
Rural Remote Health. 2018 Nov;18(4):4694
pubmed: 30447658
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jan 22;20(1):14
pubmed: 31964337
J Pers Assess. 2009 Jan;91(1):62-71
pubmed: 19085285
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2019 Sep;62(9):1129-1137
pubmed: 31420714
Acad Med. 2013 Aug;88(8):1171-7
pubmed: 23807099
Rural Remote Health. 2019 Nov;19(4):5466
pubmed: 31752495
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):91
pubmed: 32228560
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 Dec;23(5):899-920
pubmed: 29968006
BMC Geriatr. 2010 Apr 23;10:19
pubmed: 20416055

Auteurs

Anne-Kathrin Geier (AK)

Department of General Practice, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany. Anne-kathrin.geier@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.

Stefan Lippmann (S)

Department of General Practice, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Antje Rau (A)

Department of General Practice, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Anne Schrimpf (A)

Department of General Practice, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Markus Bleckwenn (M)

Department of General Practice, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Tobias Deutsch (T)

Department of General Practice, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH