Assessment of the informed consent process in the provision of dental care in Mulago hospital, Uganda.
Comprehension
Dental patients
Dental practitioners
Informed consent practices
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 11 2022
16 11 2022
Historique:
received:
20
05
2022
accepted:
31
10
2022
entrez:
17
11
2022
pubmed:
18
11
2022
medline:
22
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Informed consent is grounded in the principle of autonomy and represents patients' right to participate in clinical decisions regarding their treatment. It is equally an ethical and legal requirement in dental care. The dental practitioner must offer appropriate information about all aspects of the treatment and ensure that a patient understands and makes an informed decision. There is limited literature on informed consent for dental care in Uganda. This study assessed patients' comprehension of the informed consent process and dental practitioners' practices in obtaining informed consent. This was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted in the Dental Outpatient Department of Mulago Hospital. Two separate questionnaires were employed to collect data from dental patients and dental practitioners, respectively. Data were entered into Epi-data, coded, and imported into STATA 14 for statistical analysis. Overall, the level of patients' comprehension of the informed consent process was 91.1%, with 96.3% who felt the dental practitioners satisfactorily explained to them the treatment received and, 65.1% understood very well the information given to them. About 93.5% of the patients confessed that they were given other options of treatment while 98.5% consented before the dental practitioners started treatment. Most dental practitioners 94.7% followed good clinical practices in obtaining informed consent and 98.7% gave information before initiation of treatment while 85.3% obtained consent from patients before starting any procedures. However, only 5.3% of the dental practitioners obtained written informed consent from patients. There is a need to devise ways of improving patients' understanding of the treatment information given to them to support them make better and informed decisions regarding their care. Dental practitioners need to put more emphasis on the use of written consent in dental care because documentation helps in providing accountability and protects dentists from medical litigation in case the patients were to sue them for any treatment-related complications.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Informed consent is grounded in the principle of autonomy and represents patients' right to participate in clinical decisions regarding their treatment. It is equally an ethical and legal requirement in dental care. The dental practitioner must offer appropriate information about all aspects of the treatment and ensure that a patient understands and makes an informed decision. There is limited literature on informed consent for dental care in Uganda. This study assessed patients' comprehension of the informed consent process and dental practitioners' practices in obtaining informed consent.
METHODS
This was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted in the Dental Outpatient Department of Mulago Hospital. Two separate questionnaires were employed to collect data from dental patients and dental practitioners, respectively. Data were entered into Epi-data, coded, and imported into STATA 14 for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
Overall, the level of patients' comprehension of the informed consent process was 91.1%, with 96.3% who felt the dental practitioners satisfactorily explained to them the treatment received and, 65.1% understood very well the information given to them. About 93.5% of the patients confessed that they were given other options of treatment while 98.5% consented before the dental practitioners started treatment. Most dental practitioners 94.7% followed good clinical practices in obtaining informed consent and 98.7% gave information before initiation of treatment while 85.3% obtained consent from patients before starting any procedures. However, only 5.3% of the dental practitioners obtained written informed consent from patients.
CONCLUSION
There is a need to devise ways of improving patients' understanding of the treatment information given to them to support them make better and informed decisions regarding their care. Dental practitioners need to put more emphasis on the use of written consent in dental care because documentation helps in providing accountability and protects dentists from medical litigation in case the patients were to sue them for any treatment-related complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36384520
doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02550-2
pii: 10.1186/s12903-022-02550-2
pmc: PMC9668394
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
501Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Indian J Med Ethics. 2010 Apr-Jun;7(2):90-4
pubmed: 20432880
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2017 Winter;11(1):66-70
pubmed: 28413600
J Am Dent Assoc. 2017 Apr;148(4):211-220
pubmed: 28065430
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Oncologist. 2005 Sep;10(8):636-41
pubmed: 16177288
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 May 19;15:40
pubmed: 24885609
Br Dent J. 2015 Sep 11;219(5):221-4
pubmed: 26361123
J Med Philos. 1999 Feb;24(1):43-66
pubmed: 10223442
J Med Ethics. 2013 Jan;39(1):59-61
pubmed: 23065493