Assessment of health-related quality of life in individuals with depressive symptoms: validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L and the SF-6D.
EQ-5D-3L
Mental disorder
Responsiveness
SF-6D
Validity
Journal
The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care
ISSN: 1618-7601
Titre abrégé: Eur J Health Econ
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101134867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
24
05
2022
accepted:
24
10
2022
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
18
11
2022
entrez:
17
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The EQ-5D and the SF-6D are examples of commonly used generic preference-based instruments for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, their suitability for mental disorders has been repeatedly questioned. To assess the responsiveness and convergent validity of the EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D in patients with depressive symptoms. The data analyzed were from cardiac patients with depressive symptoms and were collected as part of the SPIRR-CAD (Stepwise Psychotherapy Intervention for Reducing Risk in Coronary Artery Disease) trial. The EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D were compared with the HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire) as disease-specific instruments. Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation. Effect sizes were calculated and ROC analysis was performed to determine responsiveness. Data from 566 patients were analysed. The SF-6D correlated considerably better with the disease-specific instruments (|r Overall, both the convergent validity and responsiveness of the SF-6D are better than those of the EQ-5D-3L in patients with depressive symptoms. The SF-6D appears, therefore, more recommendable for use in studies to evaluate interventions for this population.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The EQ-5D and the SF-6D are examples of commonly used generic preference-based instruments for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, their suitability for mental disorders has been repeatedly questioned.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To assess the responsiveness and convergent validity of the EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D in patients with depressive symptoms.
METHODS
METHODS
The data analyzed were from cardiac patients with depressive symptoms and were collected as part of the SPIRR-CAD (Stepwise Psychotherapy Intervention for Reducing Risk in Coronary Artery Disease) trial. The EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D were compared with the HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire) as disease-specific instruments. Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation. Effect sizes were calculated and ROC analysis was performed to determine responsiveness.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Data from 566 patients were analysed. The SF-6D correlated considerably better with the disease-specific instruments (|r
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, both the convergent validity and responsiveness of the SF-6D are better than those of the EQ-5D-3L in patients with depressive symptoms. The SF-6D appears, therefore, more recommendable for use in studies to evaluate interventions for this population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36385438
doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01543-w
pii: 10.1007/s10198-022-01543-w
pmc: PMC10533591
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1297-1307Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Apr;274:400-408
pubmed: 30852434
J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(11):897-906
pubmed: 2947907
Psychol Med. 2000 May;30(3):657-68
pubmed: 10883720
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;63(7):737-45
pubmed: 20494804
Health Econ. 2006 Nov;15(11):1229-36
pubmed: 16625671
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Apr 17;10:38
pubmed: 22507254
Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3 Suppl):S178-89
pubmed: 2646488
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014 Sep;34(5):502-8
pubmed: 24697967
Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;205(3):236-43
pubmed: 24855127
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Apr 26;14:148
pubmed: 23622053
Health Econ. 2002 Jan;11(1):1-8
pubmed: 11788974
Pediatrics. 2010 Dec;126(6):1117-23
pubmed: 21041282
Health Technol Assess. 2014 May;18(34):vii-viii, xiii-xxv, 1-188
pubmed: 24857402
J Gen Psychol. 2003 Apr;130(2):149-68
pubmed: 12773018
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Nov;120:12-20
pubmed: 25194472
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Sep;79(9):1323-35
pubmed: 9314394
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Sep;71(9):1478-83
pubmed: 22419775
JAMA. 1999 Nov 10;282(18):1737-44
pubmed: 10568646
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Dec;13 Suppl 9:S218-23
pubmed: 18095785
Value Health. 2007 Mar-Apr;10(2):153-60
pubmed: 17391424
Med Care. 1998 Apr;36(4):491-502
pubmed: 9544589
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1997 Feb;32(2):68-75
pubmed: 9050347
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;76(1):58-63
pubmed: 15607996
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2019 Nov;39(6):E6-E11
pubmed: 30489438
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5):732-9
pubmed: 21839412
Psychiatr Prax. 2006 Oct;33(7):330-6
pubmed: 17024582
Evid Based Ment Health. 2016 May;19(2):49-53
pubmed: 27075444
Qual Life Res. 2003;12 Suppl 1:17-23
pubmed: 12803307
Health Econ. 2002 Jan;11(1):9-12; discussion 21-2
pubmed: 11788975
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Nov 22;10:138
pubmed: 23173689
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42
pubmed: 17161752
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Apr 25;8:26
pubmed: 18439285
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 02;10(3):e0121945
pubmed: 25835001
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Apr;60(7):1571-82
pubmed: 15652688
Phys Ther. 1996 Oct;76(10):1109-23
pubmed: 8863764
J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 May;53(5):459-68
pubmed: 10812317
Control Clin Trials. 1991 Aug;12(4 Suppl):142S-158S
pubmed: 1663851
J Health Econ. 2002 Mar;21(2):271-92
pubmed: 11939242
Nutr Hosp. 2015 Dec 01;32(6):2808-21
pubmed: 26667738
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Aug 01;1:29
pubmed: 12914662
Lancet. 2006 May 27;367(9524):1747-57
pubmed: 16731270
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Jan;58(546):32-6
pubmed: 18186994
Qual Life Res. 2007 Jun;16(5):749-54
pubmed: 17294286
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Sep;45(3):880-95
pubmed: 23344734
Ann Intern Med. 1993 Apr 15;118(8):622-9
pubmed: 8452328
Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208
pubmed: 10109801
Psychosom Med. 2016 Jul-Aug;78(6):704-15
pubmed: 27187851
J Psychosom Res. 2002 Oct;53(4):849-57
pubmed: 12377293
Eur J Health Econ. 2005 Jun;6(2):124-30
pubmed: 19787848
J Health Psychol. 1998 Apr;3(2):163-70
pubmed: 22021356
Psychiatr Prax. 2004 Apr;31(3):128-37
pubmed: 15042476
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Jan 14;12(1):18
pubmed: 30642397
Med Care. 1997 Nov;35(11):1095-108
pubmed: 9366889
J Psychosom Res. 2011 Oct;71(4):215-22
pubmed: 21911098