Development and optimisation of a multi-component workplace intervention to increase cycling for the Cycle Nation Project.
active travel
co-design
cycling
evaluation
intervention development
workplace intervention
Journal
Frontiers in sports and active living
ISSN: 2624-9367
Titre abrégé: Front Sports Act Living
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101765780
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
18
01
2022
accepted:
12
09
2022
entrez:
17
11
2022
pubmed:
18
11
2022
medline:
18
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Cycle Nation Project (CNP) aimed to develop, test the feasibility of and optimize a multi-component individual-/social-level workplace-based intervention to increase cycling among office staff at a multinational bank (HSBC UK). To do this, we first explored barriers to cycling in a nationally-representative survey of UK adults, then undertook focus groups with bank employees to understand any context-specific barriers and ways in which these might be overcome. These activities led to identification of 10 individual-level, two social-level, and five organizational-level modifiable factors, which were mapped to candidate intervention components previously identified in a scoping review of cycling initiatives. Interviews with HSBC UK managers then explored the practicality of implementing the candidate intervention components in bank offices. The resultant pilot CNP intervention included 32 core components across six intervention functions (education, persuasion, incentivisation, training, environmental restructuring, enablement). Participants received a loan bike for 12-weeks (or their own bike serviced), and a 9-week cycle training course (condensed to 6 weeks for those already confident in basic cycling skills), including interactive information sharing activities, behavior change techniques (e.g., weekly goal setting), bike maintenance training, practical off-road cycling skill games and on-road group rides. Sessions were delivered by trained bank staff members who were experienced cyclists. The CNP pilot intervention was delivered across three sites with 68 participants. It was completed in two sites (the third site was stopped due to COVID-19) and was feasible and acceptable to both women and men and across different ethnicities. In addition, the CNP intervention was successful (at least in the short term) in increasing cycling by 3 rides/week on average, and improving perceptions of safety, vitality, confidence, and motivation to cycle. Following minor modifications, the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the CNP intervention should be tested in a full-scale randomized controlled trial.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36385778
doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.857554
pmc: PMC9643150
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
857554Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Connell, Logan, Somers, Baker, Broadfield, Bunn, Harper, Kelly, McIntosh, Pell, Puttnam, Robson, Gill and Gray.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The nature of the co-design of the Cycle Nation Project intervention meant that the funders, British Cycling and HSBC UK, were intimately involved in the design and delivery of the intervention, and representatives from both organizations are authors on the paper. All data analysis was performed by researchers at the University of Glasgow without input from British Cycling or HSBC UK. Authors SB and JP were employed by British Cycling, and authors SR and LH are employees of HSBC UK. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 30;10(4):e0125491
pubmed: 25928421
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Jun;56(6):407-12
pubmed: 12011193
BMJ. 2017 Apr 19;357:j1456
pubmed: 28424154
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011 Aug;21(4):496-509
pubmed: 21496106
J Clin Psychol. 2017 Apr;73(4):376-392
pubmed: 28085198
Lancet. 2009 Dec 5;374(9705):1930-43
pubmed: 19942277
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
pubmed: 11392867
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 May;70(5):520-5
pubmed: 26573236
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Jul;53(14):870-878
pubmed: 31151937
Health Educ Res. 2008 Aug;23(4):697-708
pubmed: 17947248
BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 14;5(8):e007945
pubmed: 26275902
Scand J Public Health. 2016 Feb;44(1):62-9
pubmed: 26392420
Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1429081
pubmed: 29400262
BMJ Open. 2012 Feb 02;2(1):e000694
pubmed: 22307104
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Apr;44(4):406-415
pubmed: 23498108
Am J Prev Med. 1998 Nov;15(4):379-97
pubmed: 9838979
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;54(23):1405-1415
pubmed: 32269057
J Sci Med Sport. 2006 May;9(1-2):151-6
pubmed: 16580877
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 20;14(2):e0211779
pubmed: 30785893
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 Dec 10;7:89
pubmed: 21143948
J Psychiatr Res. 2020 Jan;120:144-153
pubmed: 31678749
WMJ. 2017 Aug;116(3):154-160
pubmed: 29323831
Am J Public Health. 2015 Aug;105(8):e13-5
pubmed: 26066942
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Nov 27;5:63
pubmed: 18042300
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Nov;19(99):1-188
pubmed: 26616119
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Nov;55(5):615-623
pubmed: 30342627
J Phys Act Health. 2019 Jun 27;16(7):547-555
pubmed: 31149869
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Jul;36 Suppl 1:S3-13
pubmed: 21800946
Health Promot Int. 2005 Jun;20(2):123-33
pubmed: 15722366
Prev Med. 2010 Aug;51(2):132-5
pubmed: 20580736
BMJ Open. 2013 Nov 14;3(11):e003797
pubmed: 24231462
J Hum Hypertens. 2015 Apr;29(4):219-23
pubmed: 25273856
BMJ. 2004 Oct 2;329(7469):763
pubmed: 15385407
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jun 17;13:587
pubmed: 23773476
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Jul;53(14):879-885
pubmed: 31151938
PLoS Med. 2016 Jul 12;13(7):e1002076
pubmed: 27403867
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 19;9:1642
pubmed: 30283372