Investigating the feasibility of a hand-held photoacoustic imaging probe for margin assessment during breast conserving surgery.
Breast cancer
Breast conserving surgery
Lumpectomy
Optoacoustic imaging
Photoacoustic imaging
Journal
Photoacoustics
ISSN: 2213-5979
Titre abrégé: Photoacoustics
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101622604
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
29
08
2022
revised:
10
10
2022
accepted:
31
10
2022
entrez:
17
11
2022
pubmed:
18
11
2022
medline:
18
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Approximately 19 % of breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS) must return for a secondary surgery due to incomplete tumour removal. Our previous work demonstrated that the lower lipid content, characteristic of tumour tissue, was observed as regions of hypo-intense photoacoustic (PA) contrast. The goal of this work was to evaluate feasibility of a low-frequency, hand-held PA imaging probe for surgical margin assessment based on lipid content differences. Here, we describe (i) the design of a prototype hand-held PA imaging probe, (ii) the effect of limited-bandwidth on image contrast, (iii) accuracy towards hypo-intense contrast detection, (iv) the limited-view characteristics of the single sensor design, and (iv) early imaging results of an ex-vivo breast cancer specimen. The probe incorporates a single polyvinylidene fluoride acoustic sensor, a 1-to-4 optical fibre bundle and a polycarbonate axicon lens for light delivery. Imaging results on phantoms designed to mimic positive margins demonstrated the ability to detect gaps in optical absorption as small as 1 mm in width. Compared to images from a near full-view PAI system, the hand-held PAI probe had higher signal to noise ratio but suffered from negativity image artifacts. Lumpectomy specimen imaging showed that strong signals can be obtained from the fatty tissue. Taken together, the results show this imaging approach with a hand-held probe has potential for detection of residual breast cancer tissue during BCS; however, more work is needed to reduce the size of the probe to fit within the surgical cavity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36386296
doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2022.100424
pii: S2213-5979(22)00089-1
pmc: PMC9650058
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100424Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Jeffrey Carson reports financial support was provided by FACIT. Jeffrey Carson reports a relationship with Multimagnetics Inc. that includes: equity or stocks and funding grants. Jeffrey Carson has patent #US9128032 pending to Multimagnetics Inc.
Références
Biomed Opt Express. 2015 Mar 12;6(4):1273-81
pubmed: 25909011
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 8;18(1):94
pubmed: 29422097
Photoacoustics. 2021 Aug 04;23:100290
pubmed: 34401325
Med Devices Sens. 2018 Jun;1(3):
pubmed: 31435620
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 15;23(22):6912-6922
pubmed: 28899968
Biomed Opt Express. 2014 Sep 18;5(10):3684-98
pubmed: 25360382
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Apr;14(4):1478-85
pubmed: 17235716
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Apr;228(4):504-512.e2
pubmed: 30703538
Cancer Res. 2006 Mar 15;66(6):3317-22
pubmed: 16540686
Med Phys. 2004 Apr;31(4):724-33
pubmed: 15124989
J Biomed Opt. 2017 Apr 1;22(4):41011
pubmed: 28114443
Photoacoustics. 2020 Oct 27;21:100218
pubmed: 33364161
J Biomed Opt. 2018 Oct;23(10):1-19
pubmed: 30369108
Photoacoustics. 2020 Mar 11;18:100173
pubmed: 32215250
Opt Express. 2013 Jan 28;21(2):2185-94
pubmed: 23389199
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jun 29;21(13):
pubmed: 34209996
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Mar 1;88(3):553-64
pubmed: 24521674
Am J Surg. 2008 Oct;196(4):483-9
pubmed: 18809049
J Biomed Opt. 2010 May-Jun;15(3):037015
pubmed: 20615044
Opt Express. 2010 Apr 12;18(8):8058-76
pubmed: 20588651
J Biomed Opt. 2011 Jul;16(7):077006
pubmed: 21806286
J Biomed Opt. 2022 Aug;27(8):
pubmed: 36042544
Photoacoustics. 2020 Apr 24;18:100165
pubmed: 32426228
Cancer Res. 2009 Nov 15;69(22):8790-6
pubmed: 19910294
Biomed Opt Express. 2021 Feb 16;12(3):1407-1421
pubmed: 33796362
Photoacoustics. 2022 Sep 24;28:100404
pubmed: 36185542
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 May 01;19(5):484-493
pubmed: 34794122
Photoacoustics. 2018 Feb 21;10:31-37
pubmed: 29988835
J Invest Dermatol. 2017 Jun;137(6):1370-1372
pubmed: 28163070
J Biomed Opt. 2011 Aug;16(8):087010
pubmed: 21895337
Ultrasonography. 2016 Oct;35(4):267-80
pubmed: 27669961
J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 10;32(14):1502-6
pubmed: 24711553
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 16;7:40683
pubmed: 28091596
Am J Clin Pathol. 2012 Nov;138(5):657-69
pubmed: 23086766
J Biomed Opt. 2019 May;24(5):1-12
pubmed: 31111698
Sci Transl Med. 2013 Jul 17;5(194):194ra93
pubmed: 23863833
Photoacoustics. 2018 Jul 06;11:14-27
pubmed: 30073147
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013 May;10(3):301-15
pubmed: 23668703
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Oct;19(10):3236-45
pubmed: 22847119
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;42(12):1834-1840
pubmed: 27591938
Mol Cell Biochem. 2013 Feb;374(1-2):223-32
pubmed: 23180247