Quantitative analysis of venous outflow with photo-plethysmography in patients with suspected thoracic outlet syndrome.
arm abduction
pathophysiology
photo-plethysmography (PPG)
thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS)
upper limb
venous outflow impairment
venous volume
Journal
Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
ISSN: 2297-055X
Titre abrégé: Front Cardiovasc Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101653388
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
28
10
2021
accepted:
10
10
2022
entrez:
17
11
2022
pubmed:
18
11
2022
medline:
18
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Venous compression is the second most frequent form of thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). Although venous photo-plethysmography (PPG) has been largely used to estimate the consequences of chronic thromboses (Paget Schroetter syndrome), systematic direct quantitative recording of hemodynamic consequences of positional venous outflow impairment in patients with suspected TOS has never been reported. We hypothesized that moving the arms forward (prayer: "Pra" position) while keeping the hands elevated after a surrender/candlestick position (Ca) would allow quantification of 100% upper limb venous emptying (PPGmax) and quantitative evaluation of the emptying observed at the end of the preceding abduction period (End-Ca-PPG), expressed in %PPGmax. We measured V-PPG in 424 patients referred for suspected TOS (age 40.9 years old, 68.3% females) and retrieved the results of ultrasound investigation at the venous level. We used receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC) to determine the optimal V-PPG values to be used to predict the presence of a venous compression on ultrasound imaging. Results are reported as a median (25/75 centiles). Statistical significance was based on a two-tailed An End-Ca-PPG value of 87% PPGmax at the end of the "Ca" period is the optimal point to detect an ultrasound-confirmed positional venous compression (area under ROC: 0.589 ± 0.024; V-PPG is not aimed at detecting the presence of a venous compression due to collateral veins potentially normalizing outflow despite subclavicular vein compression during abduction, but we believe that it could be used to strengthen the responsibility of venous compression in upper limb symptoms in TOS-suspected patients, with the possibility of non-invasive, bilateral, recordable measurements of forearm volume that become quantitative with the Ca-Pra maneuver. [ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT04376177].
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Venous compression is the second most frequent form of thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). Although venous photo-plethysmography (PPG) has been largely used to estimate the consequences of chronic thromboses (Paget Schroetter syndrome), systematic direct quantitative recording of hemodynamic consequences of positional venous outflow impairment in patients with suspected TOS has never been reported.
Objective
UNASSIGNED
We hypothesized that moving the arms forward (prayer: "Pra" position) while keeping the hands elevated after a surrender/candlestick position (Ca) would allow quantification of 100% upper limb venous emptying (PPGmax) and quantitative evaluation of the emptying observed at the end of the preceding abduction period (End-Ca-PPG), expressed in %PPGmax.
Materials and methods
UNASSIGNED
We measured V-PPG in 424 patients referred for suspected TOS (age 40.9 years old, 68.3% females) and retrieved the results of ultrasound investigation at the venous level. We used receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC) to determine the optimal V-PPG values to be used to predict the presence of a venous compression on ultrasound imaging. Results are reported as a median (25/75 centiles). Statistical significance was based on a two-tailed
Results
UNASSIGNED
An End-Ca-PPG value of 87% PPGmax at the end of the "Ca" period is the optimal point to detect an ultrasound-confirmed positional venous compression (area under ROC: 0.589 ± 0.024;
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
V-PPG is not aimed at detecting the presence of a venous compression due to collateral veins potentially normalizing outflow despite subclavicular vein compression during abduction, but we believe that it could be used to strengthen the responsibility of venous compression in upper limb symptoms in TOS-suspected patients, with the possibility of non-invasive, bilateral, recordable measurements of forearm volume that become quantitative with the Ca-Pra maneuver.
Clinical trial registration
UNASSIGNED
[ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT04376177].
Identifiants
pubmed: 36386307
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.803919
pmc: PMC9651176
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04376177']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
803919Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Hersant, Ramondou, Josse, Lecoq, Henni and Abraham.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Front Physiol. 2021 Apr 13;12:652456
pubmed: 33927642
Health Technol Assess (Rockv). 1996;(7):1-46
pubmed: 8724636
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jun 21;11(6):
pubmed: 34205560
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Oct;68(4):939-940
pubmed: 30244934
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2018;77(4):677-682
pubmed: 29500894
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Sep;156(3):1318-1323.e1
pubmed: 29628349
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Aug;30(2):232-6
pubmed: 16829092
Int J Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;4(4):195-202
pubmed: 30906922
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Dec;28(4):395-406
pubmed: 25480769
Diagnostics (Basel). 2018 Jan 25;8(1):
pubmed: 29370085
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2012 Feb;8(1):14-25
pubmed: 22845812
J Vasc Surg. 1994 Nov;20(5):721-7
pubmed: 7966807
J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Oct;30(5):727-36
pubmed: 26318315
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Sep;76(9):833-9
pubmed: 7668954
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2014 Feb;48(2):106-10
pubmed: 24334914
Angiology. 1985 Nov;36(11):795-801
pubmed: 4061968
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 May;9(3):801-810.e5
pubmed: 33540134
Angiology. 1990 May;41(5):382-6
pubmed: 2356975
Radiographics. 2016 Jul-Aug;36(4):984-1000
pubmed: 27257767
J Biomed Eng. 1993 Mar;15(2):135-9
pubmed: 8459692
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):335-41
pubmed: 16476612
Phlebology. 2012 Apr;27(3):135-40
pubmed: 21893550
Thromb Haemost. 1994 Oct;72(4):540-2
pubmed: 7878628
Postgrad Med. 2021 Aug;133(sup1):3-10
pubmed: 33618595
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Sep;156(3):1324-1325
pubmed: 29961587
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Feb;47:253-259
pubmed: 28943489
Jpn J Physiol. 1994;44(2):181-91
pubmed: 7967220
Radiology. 1988 Jul;168(1):109-12
pubmed: 3380949
Phlebology. 2013 Mar;28(2):101-8
pubmed: 23393068
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;47(1):81-6
pubmed: 24262322
Physiol Meas. 2007 Mar;28(3):R1-39
pubmed: 17322588
Thorac Surg Clin. 2021 Feb;31(1):27-44
pubmed: 33220769
J Vasc Surg. 1990 Mar;11(3):436-40
pubmed: 2313832
Radiographics. 2006 Nov-Dec;26(6):1735-50
pubmed: 17102047
Front Physiol. 2021 Nov 23;12:765174
pubmed: 34887775