High weekly integral dose and larger fraction size increase risk of fatigue and worsening of functional outcomes following radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.
fatigue
functional loss
integral dose
prostate cancer
radiotherapy - adverse effects
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
06
05
2022
accepted:
28
09
2022
entrez:
17
11
2022
pubmed:
18
11
2022
medline:
18
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We hypothesized that increasing the pelvic integral dose (ID) and a higher dose per fraction correlate with worsening fatigue and functional outcomes in localized prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). The study design was a retrospective analysis of two prospective observational cohorts, REQUITE (development, n=543) and DUE-01 (validation, n=228). Data were available for comorbidities, medication, androgen deprivation therapy, previous surgeries, smoking, age, and body mass index. The ID was calculated as the product of the mean body dose and body volume. The weekly ID accounted for differences in fractionation. The worsening (end of radiotherapy versus baseline) of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 scores in physical/role/social functioning and fatigue symptom scales were evaluated, and two outcome measures were defined as worsening in ≥2 (WS2) or ≥3 (WS3) scales, respectively. The weekly ID and clinical risk factors were tested in multivariable logistic regression analysis. In REQUITE, WS2 was seen in 28% and WS3 in 16% of patients. The median weekly ID was 13.1 L·Gy/week [interquartile (IQ) range 10.2-19.3]. The weekly ID, diabetes, the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and the dose per fraction were significantly associated with WS2 [AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve) =0.59; 95% CI 0.55-0.63] and WS3 (AUC=0.60; 95% CI 0.55-0.64). The prevalence of WS2 (15.3%) and WS3 (6.1%) was lower in DUE-01, but the median weekly ID was higher (15.8 L·Gy/week; IQ range 13.2-19.3). The model for WS2 was validated with reduced discrimination (AUC=0.52 95% CI 0.47-0.61), The AUC for WS3 was 0.58. Increasing the weekly ID and the dose per fraction lead to the worsening of fatigue and functional outcomes in patients with localized PCa treated with EBRT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36387203
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.937934
pmc: PMC9645430
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
937934Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Joseph, Cicchetti, McWilliam, Webb, Seibold, Fiorino, Cozzarini, Veldeman, Bultijnck, Fonteyne, Talbot, Symonds, Johnson, Rattay, Lambrecht, Haustermans, De Meerleer, Elliott, Sperk, Herskind, Veldwijk, Avuzzi, Giandini, Valdagni, Azria, Jacquet, Charissoux, Vega, Aguado-Barrera, Gómez-Caamaño, Franco, Garibaldi, Girelli, Iotti, Vavassori, Chang-Claude, West, Rancati and Choudhury.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Transl Cancer Res. 2019 Sep;8(5):1882-1903
pubmed: 35116939
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2002 Mar;41(3):317-25
pubmed: 11880207
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Dec 1;48(5):1371-80
pubmed: 11121636
Med Phys. 2003 Aug;30(8):2065-71
pubmed: 12945972
Radiother Oncol. 2012 May;103(2):217-22
pubmed: 22341794
Brain Behav Immun. 2016 Feb;52:145-152
pubmed: 26515035
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Sep 23;11:558474
pubmed: 33178015
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Dec;121(3):440-446
pubmed: 27979370
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Jan;118(1):92-8
pubmed: 26777123
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997 Feb;13(2):63-74
pubmed: 9095563
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jul 10;34(20):2325-32
pubmed: 27044935
Future Oncol. 2014 Apr;10(5):835-43
pubmed: 24799064
Lancet. 2019 Aug 3;394(10196):385-395
pubmed: 31227373
Radiother Oncol. 2015 Aug;116(2):185-91
pubmed: 26276529
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Apr;119(1):123-8
pubmed: 26993415
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Dec;22(12):2278-2287
pubmed: 32767619
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Nov;121(2):299-303
pubmed: 28029404
BMJ. 2015 Jan 07;350:g7594
pubmed: 25569120
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Sep;138:59-67
pubmed: 31146072
Support Care Cancer. 2007 Oct;15(10):1169-76
pubmed: 17333296
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Mar;144:148-151
pubmed: 31812929
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 20;26(12):2055-6; author reply 2056-7
pubmed: 18421061
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jan;15(1):223-9
pubmed: 8996146
Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Nov 26;10:6367-6377
pubmed: 30568498
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76
pubmed: 8433390
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Nov 1;69(3):646-55
pubmed: 17531401
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Mar 1;64(3):962-7
pubmed: 16458781
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Nov 15;96(4):759-769
pubmed: 27788949
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2014 Dec;26(12):739-42
pubmed: 25267305
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1531-1543
pubmed: 31540791
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2009 Nov;21(9):706-12
pubmed: 19713087
Br J Cancer. 2008 Nov 4;99(9):1408-14
pubmed: 18941462
Head Neck. 2020 Nov;42(11):3141-3152
pubmed: 32627261
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Mar 15;67(4):1135-44
pubmed: 17208388
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Mar 1;70(3):935-43
pubmed: 18164828
J Cancer Res Ther. 2010 Oct-Dec;6(4):516-20
pubmed: 21358092
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jan 29;12:622262
pubmed: 33584319
Strahlenther Onkol. 2002 Jul;178(7):357-62
pubmed: 12163989
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Jul;48(11):1713-21
pubmed: 22418017
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 11;:JCO1801097
pubmed: 30307776
Eur J Cancer. 2000 Jun;36(9):1134-41
pubmed: 10854947
J Endocrinol. 2021 Sep 28;251(2):R11-R22
pubmed: 34463292
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1047-1060
pubmed: 27339115
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2014 Oct;6(3):323-30
pubmed: 25337138