Medical disaster response: A critical analysis of the 2010 Haiti earthquake.
Haiti earthquake
United Nations disaster response
disaster response
humanitarian response
military humanitarianism
Journal
Frontiers in public health
ISSN: 2296-2565
Titre abrégé: Front Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101616579
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
16
07
2022
accepted:
07
09
2022
entrez:
17
11
2022
pubmed:
18
11
2022
medline:
22
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
On January 12, 2010, a 7.0 magnitude earthquake struck the Republic of Haiti. The human cost was enormous-an estimated 316,000 people were killed, and a further 300,000 were injured. The scope of the disaster was matched by the scope of the response, which remains the largest multinational humanitarian response to date. An extensive scoping review of the relevant literature was undertaken, to identify studies that discussed the civilian and military disaster relief efforts. The aim was to highlight the key-lessons learned, that can be applied to future disaster response practise. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidance was followed. Seven scientific databases were searched, using consistent search terms-followed by an analysis of the existent Haitian literature. This process was supplemented by reviewing available grey literature. A total of 2,671 articles were reviewed, 106 of which were included in the study. In-depth analysis was structured, by aligning data to 12 key-domains, whilst also considering cross-sector interaction (Civilian-Civilian, Military-Military, and Civilian-Military). Dominant themes and lessons learned were identified and recorded in an online spreadsheet by an international research team. This study focuses on explicitly analysing the medical aspects of the humanitarian response. An unpreceded collaborative effort between non-governmental organisations, international militaries, and local stakeholders, led to a substantial number of disaster victims receiving life and limb-saving care. However, the response was not faultless. Relief efforts were complicated by large influxes of inexperienced actors, inadequate preliminary needs assessments, a lack of pre-existing policy regarding conduct and inter-agency collaboration, and limited consideration of post-disaster redevelopment during initial planning. Furthermore, one critical theme that bridged all aspects of the disaster response, was the failure of the international community to ensure Haitian involvement. No modern disaster has yet been as devastating as the 2010 Haiti earthquake. Given the ongoing climate crisis, as well as the risks posed by armed conflict-this will not remain the case indefinitely. This systematic analysis of the combined civilian and military disaster response, offers vital evidence for informing future medical relief efforts-and provides considerable opportunity to advance knowledge pertaining to disaster response.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36388301
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.995595
pmc: PMC9665839
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
995595Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Arnaouti, Cahill, Baird, Mangurat, Harris, Edme, Joseph, Worlton, Augustin and The Haiti Disaster Response – Junior Research Collaborative (HDR-JRC).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 Jun 2;16(6):1454-1463
pubmed: 31809650
Am J Disaster Med. 2012 Winter;7(1):37-47
pubmed: 22649867
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2013 Oct;7(5):491-8
pubmed: 24135315
Lancet. 2010 Apr 3;375(9721):1162-3
pubmed: 20362812
Am J Disaster Med. 2012 Fall;7(4):281-94
pubmed: 23264276
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jul 6;153(1):45-8
pubmed: 20442270
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012 Dec;6(4):370-7
pubmed: 23241468
Can J Surg. 2012 Aug;55(4):271-4
pubmed: 22854149
World J Surg. 2016 Sep;40(9):2117-22
pubmed: 27255939
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
J Public Health (Oxf). 2020 Aug 18;42(3):e287-e298
pubmed: 31822891
Am J Disaster Med. 2017 Fall;12(4):243-256
pubmed: 29468626
BMJ. 2002 Feb 9;324(7333):346-9
pubmed: 11834565
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012 Oct;6(3):200-8
pubmed: 23077262
Mil Med. 2011 Oct;176(10):1128-32
pubmed: 22128647
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 14;11(10):e051908
pubmed: 34649848
Emerg Med J. 2019 Jul;36(7):387-388
pubmed: 30940713
Confl Health. 2021 Apr 10;15(1):25
pubmed: 33838690
Disasters. 2014 Oct;38(4):833-45
pubmed: 25196339
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19 Suppl 1:S44-8
pubmed: 21304048
Med Confl Surviv. 2010 Oct-Dec;26(4):281-97
pubmed: 21314081
East Mediterr Health J. 2018 Dec 09;24(9):811-812
pubmed: 30570112
N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 11;362(10):e32
pubmed: 20181962
J Surg Orthop Adv. 2011 Spring;20(1):62-6
pubmed: 21477536
J R Soc Med. 2015 Oct;108(10):390-5
pubmed: 26432813