Role of local therapy in the management of patients with metastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma: a National Cancer Database study.
Metastatic anal cancer
local therapy
overall survival
palliative radiation
surgical resection
Journal
Journal of gastrointestinal oncology
ISSN: 2078-6891
Titre abrégé: J Gastrointest Oncol
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101557751
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
28
03
2022
accepted:
04
07
2022
entrez:
17
11
2022
pubmed:
18
11
2022
medline:
18
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
About 10-20% of patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCCa) present with metastatic disease and are usually treated with systemic chemotherapy. However, primary tumor control is crucial as local failure is associated with significant morbidity. Using the largest cohort to date, we report the impact of local therapy on survival among patients with metastatic anal SCCa. Data were collected from US hospitals that contributed to the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2004 and 2015. Patients who did not receive palliative systemic chemotherapy were excluded from analysis. Univariate (UVA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed to identify factors associated with patient outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between tumor/patient characteristics and overall survival (OS). A total of 1,160 patients were identified over the 12 years of study. Median age was 57 years. Majority were female (64.9%), non-Hispanic Whites (79.1%) and had Charlson-Deyo Score of 0 (83.6%). Most common metastatic sites were liver (25.9%), lung (11.6%) and bone (8.5%). More than 79% of the patients had received radiation to the primary site, and 10.4% underwent surgical resection for local control. Use of local therapy correlated closely with OS on MVA (HR 0.66; 0.55-0.79; P<0.001), with a 12-month and 5-year OS rates of 72.8% and 25.7% respectively, compared with 61.1% and 14.6% for patients treated with chemotherapy only. Poor prognostic factors included male gender (HR 1.44; 1.24-1.67; P<0.001), age >70 years (HR 1.28; 1.02-1.62; P=0.034), lack of health insurance (HR 1.32; 1.02-1.71; P=0.034), and cloacogenic zone location (HR 4.02; 1.43-11.30; P=0.008). There was no benefit from abdominoperineal resection (mOS =19.7 months; HR 1.05; 0.48-2.29; P=0.909), but both local resection of the primary (mOS =24.8 months, HR 0.48; 0.29-0.80; P=0.005) and palliative radiation (mOS =22.6 months; HR 0.66; 0.55-0.79; P<0.001) were associated with improved OS. In addition to systemic therapy, resection of the primary tumor or palliative radiation improved OS in patients with anal SCCa. Patients unlikely to benefit from local control were those >70 years of age, male, lack of health insurance and cloacogenic carcinoma.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
About 10-20% of patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCCa) present with metastatic disease and are usually treated with systemic chemotherapy. However, primary tumor control is crucial as local failure is associated with significant morbidity. Using the largest cohort to date, we report the impact of local therapy on survival among patients with metastatic anal SCCa.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Data were collected from US hospitals that contributed to the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2004 and 2015. Patients who did not receive palliative systemic chemotherapy were excluded from analysis. Univariate (UVA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed to identify factors associated with patient outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between tumor/patient characteristics and overall survival (OS).
Results
UNASSIGNED
A total of 1,160 patients were identified over the 12 years of study. Median age was 57 years. Majority were female (64.9%), non-Hispanic Whites (79.1%) and had Charlson-Deyo Score of 0 (83.6%). Most common metastatic sites were liver (25.9%), lung (11.6%) and bone (8.5%). More than 79% of the patients had received radiation to the primary site, and 10.4% underwent surgical resection for local control. Use of local therapy correlated closely with OS on MVA (HR 0.66; 0.55-0.79; P<0.001), with a 12-month and 5-year OS rates of 72.8% and 25.7% respectively, compared with 61.1% and 14.6% for patients treated with chemotherapy only. Poor prognostic factors included male gender (HR 1.44; 1.24-1.67; P<0.001), age >70 years (HR 1.28; 1.02-1.62; P=0.034), lack of health insurance (HR 1.32; 1.02-1.71; P=0.034), and cloacogenic zone location (HR 4.02; 1.43-11.30; P=0.008). There was no benefit from abdominoperineal resection (mOS =19.7 months; HR 1.05; 0.48-2.29; P=0.909), but both local resection of the primary (mOS =24.8 months, HR 0.48; 0.29-0.80; P=0.005) and palliative radiation (mOS =22.6 months; HR 0.66; 0.55-0.79; P<0.001) were associated with improved OS.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
In addition to systemic therapy, resection of the primary tumor or palliative radiation improved OS in patients with anal SCCa. Patients unlikely to benefit from local control were those >70 years of age, male, lack of health insurance and cloacogenic carcinoma.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36388688
doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-125
pii: jgo-13-05-2306
pmc: PMC9660037
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2306-2321Informations de copyright
2022 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-22-125/coif). WLS reports that he receives consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Mylan, Ipsen Pharmaceuticals, Lexicon, Blueprints and Eisai. MD reports that she receives consulting fees from Novartis and Guardant Health. OBA report that he receives consulting fees from Ipsen Pharmaceuticals, Natera, Taiho, Pfizer, QED Therapeutics as well as research support from Taiho Oncology, Ipsen Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Bristol Myers Squibb, PCI Biotech AS, ASCO, Calithera Biosciences, Inc., SynCore Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Mabspace Biosciences, Corcept Therapeutics. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989 Jun 7;81(11):850-6
pubmed: 2724350
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):139-62
pubmed: 25582527
Cancer. 2004 Jul 15;101(2):270-80
pubmed: 15241823
Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Oct;44(10):1496-502
pubmed: 11598480
Cancer. 2004 Jul 15;101(2):281-8
pubmed: 15241824
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Aug 1;38(22):2510-2518
pubmed: 32530769
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 28;21(8):2294-302
pubmed: 25741135
ESMO Open. 2020 Sep;4(Suppl 2):e000711
pubmed: 32883674
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004 Dec 15;37(5):1563-5
pubmed: 15577408
Cancer. 2003 Mar 1;97(5):1195-202
pubmed: 12599225
CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 Jan;63(1):11-30
pubmed: 23335087
J Immunother Cancer. 2021 Nov;9(11):
pubmed: 34815354
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33
pubmed: 33433946
J Exp Pharmacol. 2021 Apr 09;13:433-440
pubmed: 33859504
J Infect Dis. 1998 Feb;177(2):361-7
pubmed: 9466522
Oncotarget. 2014 Nov 30;5(22):11133-42
pubmed: 25373735
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Oct;40(10):1165-76
pubmed: 25239441
Oncology. 2014;87(2):125-32
pubmed: 25012155
AIDS. 2003 Jan 24;17(2):279-80
pubmed: 12545098