The association between objective cognitive measures and ecological-functional outcomes in COVID-19.

COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 cognitive screening ecological validity functional independence measures neuropsychology

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 24 03 2022
accepted: 12 10 2022
entrez: 17 11 2022
pubmed: 18 11 2022
medline: 18 11 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cognitive dysfunctions, both subjective and detectable at psychometric testing, may follow SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the ecological-functional relevance of such objective deficits is currently under-investigated. This study thus aimed at investigating the association between objective cognitive measures and both physical and cognitive, ecological-functional outcomes in Forty-two COVID-19-recovered individuals were administered the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was adopted to assess functional-ecological, motor/physical (FIM-Motor) and cognitive (FIM-Cognitive) outcomes at admission (T0) and discharge (T1). When predicting both T0/T1 FIM-total and-Motor scores based on MMSE/MoCA scores, premorbid risk for cognitive decline (RCD) and disease-related features, no model yielded a significant fit. However, the MoCA - but not the MMSE significantly predicted T0/T1 FIM-Cognitive scores. The MoCA was significantly related only to T0/T1 FIM-Cognitive Memory items. Cognitive measures are not associated with physical/motor everyday-life outcomes in

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Cognitive dysfunctions, both subjective and detectable at psychometric testing, may follow SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the ecological-functional relevance of such objective deficits is currently under-investigated. This study thus aimed at investigating the association between objective cognitive measures and both physical and cognitive, ecological-functional outcomes in
Methods UNASSIGNED
Forty-two COVID-19-recovered individuals were administered the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was adopted to assess functional-ecological, motor/physical (FIM-Motor) and cognitive (FIM-Cognitive) outcomes at admission (T0) and discharge (T1).
Results UNASSIGNED
When predicting both T0/T1 FIM-total and-Motor scores based on MMSE/MoCA scores, premorbid risk for cognitive decline (RCD) and disease-related features, no model yielded a significant fit. However, the MoCA - but not the MMSE significantly predicted T0/T1 FIM-Cognitive scores. The MoCA was significantly related only to T0/T1 FIM-Cognitive Memory items.
Discussion UNASSIGNED
Cognitive measures are not associated with physical/motor everyday-life outcomes in

Identifiants

pubmed: 36389563
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903697
pmc: PMC9665234
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

903697

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Ottonello, Fiabane, Aiello, Manera, Spada and Pistarini.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Neurol Sci. 2022 Jan;43(1):81-84
pubmed: 34668124
Brain Sci. 2021 Nov 11;11(11):
pubmed: 34827488
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022 Feb;34(2):375-382
pubmed: 34313961
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Apr;32(4):699-702
pubmed: 31230268
Neurol Sci. 2022 Feb;43(2):785-788
pubmed: 34791568
Neurol Sci. 2022 Aug;43(8):4599-4604
pubmed: 35604618
Am J Med Qual. 2022 May-Jun 01;37(3):266-271
pubmed: 34369895
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2118717
pubmed: 34323987
Neurol Sci. 2022 Jan;43(1):45-50
pubmed: 34779965
Neurol Sci. 2021 Jul;42(7):2625-2635
pubmed: 33914195
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Feb;75(2):127-32
pubmed: 8311667
Clin Med (Lond). 2020 Jul;20(4):359-365
pubmed: 32518105
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Nov;63(6):554-556
pubmed: 32315802
Front Neurol. 2021 Jul 29;12:699582
pubmed: 34393978
Neurol Sci. 2022 Nov;43(11):6189-6214
pubmed: 35932375
Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2022;10(3):182-187
pubmed: 35602927
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 24;19(9):
pubmed: 35564579
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Jul 01;14:909661
pubmed: 35847679
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Nov;9(11):1275-1287
pubmed: 34627560
Brain Behav Immun. 2021 Oct;97:328-348
pubmed: 34339806

Auteurs

Marcella Ottonello (M)

Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine of Genova Nervi Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Genova, Italy.

Elena Fiabane (E)

Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine of Genova Nervi Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Genova, Italy.

Edoardo Nicolò Aiello (EN)

PhD Program in Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.

Marina Rita Manera (MR)

Psychology Unit of Pavia Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.

Francesca Spada (F)

Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine of Genova Nervi Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Genova, Italy.

Caterina Pistarini (C)

Department of Neurorehabilitation of Pavia Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.

Classifications MeSH