Retinal toxicity in a multinational inception cohort of patients with systemic lupus on hydroxychloroquine.
epidemiology
lupus erythematosus, systemic
outcome assessment, health care
Journal
Lupus science & medicine
ISSN: 2053-8790
Titre abrégé: Lupus Sci Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101633705
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
received:
26
07
2022
accepted:
17
10
2022
entrez:
17
11
2022
pubmed:
18
11
2022
medline:
22
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)-related retinal toxicity in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) inception cohort. Data were collected at annual study visits between 1999 and 2019. We followed patients with incident SLE from first visit on HCQ (time zero) up to time of retinal toxicity (outcome), death, loss-to-follow-up or end of study. Potential retinal toxicity was identified from SLICC Damage Index scores; cases were confirmed with chart review. Using cumulative HCQ duration as the time axis, we constructed univariate Cox regression models to assess if covariates (ie, HCQ daily dose/kg, sex, race/ethnicity, age at SLE onset, education, body mass index, renal damage, chloroquine use) were associated with HCQ-related retinal toxicity. We studied 1460 patients (89% female, 52% white). Retinal toxicity was confirmed in 11 patients (incidence 1.0 per 1000 person-years, 0.8% overall). Average cumulative time on HCQ in those with retinal toxicity was 7.4 (SD 3.2) years; the first case was detected 4 years after HCQ initiation. Risk of retinal toxicity was numerically higher in older patients at SLE diagnosis (univariate HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.09). This is the first assessment of HCQ and retinal disease in incident SLE. We did not see any cases of retinopathy within the first 4 years of HCQ. Cumulative HCQ may be associated with increased risk. Ophthalmology monitoring (and formal assessment of cases of potential toxicity, by a retinal specialist) remains important, especially in patients on HCQ for 10+ years, those needing higher doses and those of older age at SLE diagnosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36396267
pii: 9/1/e000789
doi: 10.1136/lupus-2022-000789
pmc: PMC9677013
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hydroxychloroquine
4QWG6N8QKH
Antirheumatic Agents
0
Chloroquine
886U3H6UFF
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : P60 AR064464
Pays : United States
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : CIHR
ID : PJT-156395
Pays : Canada
Organisme : NCRR NIH HHS
ID : M01 RR000046
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR000150
Pays : United States
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 AR069572
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCRR NIH HHS
ID : UL1 RR025741
Pays : United States
Organisme : Arthritis Research UK
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NCCDPHP CDC HHS
ID : U01 DP005119
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 AR043727
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001422
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : P60 AR048098
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: All the following relationships are outside the submitted work. AEC—consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exagen Diagnostics and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). CG—consulting fees from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Morton Grove Pharmaceutical (MGP), Sanofi and UCB. RR-G—consulting fees from GSK, Immuncor and ThermoFisher. DI—consulting fees from Amgen, Merck Serono, AstraZeneca and Eli Lilly (the honoraria are passed onto a local arthritis charity). AR—consulting fees from Lilly. PRF—participation in advisory boards from AbbVie, AstraZeneca and Lilly. MK—consulting fees from GSK. MI—consulting fees from AbbVie, UCB, Novartis, Janssen and Lilly.
Références
Lupus Sci Med. 2020 Nov;7(1):
pubmed: 33148665
J Rheumatol. 2017 Nov;44(11):1674-1679
pubmed: 28864645
Lupus Sci Med. 2022 Nov;9(1):
pubmed: 36396267
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jun;78(6):736-745
pubmed: 30926722
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 May 03;12:811-818
pubmed: 29765194
Lupus. 2006;15(9):606-7
pubmed: 17080917
J Rheumatol. 2003 Aug;30(8):1756-60
pubmed: 12913931
Arthritis Rheum. 1996 Mar;39(3):363-9
pubmed: 8607884
Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:377-83
pubmed: 22457587
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Jun;27(3):329-40
pubmed: 24238690
Lupus. 2019 Apr;28(4):555-559
pubmed: 30755141
Eye (Lond). 2017 Jun;31(6):828-845
pubmed: 28282061
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 May;50(5):982-8
pubmed: 21245073
Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Mar;81(3):370-378
pubmed: 34911705
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Jun;62(6):775-84
pubmed: 20535788
Eye (Lond). 2018 Jul;32(7):1168-1173
pubmed: 29887605
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Jun;73(6):908-911
pubmed: 33559327
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Dec 1;59(12):3807-3816
pubmed: 32442312
Eye (Lond). 2021 Jan;35(1):343-348
pubmed: 32587388
J Rheumatol. 2020 Apr;47(4):553-556
pubmed: 31474597
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Mar;72(3):448-453
pubmed: 31532077
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec;132(12):1453-60
pubmed: 25275721
Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Jan;129(1):30-9
pubmed: 21220626
Arthritis Rheum. 1997 Sep;40(9):1725
pubmed: 9324032
Ophthalmology. 2016 Jun;123(6):1386-94
pubmed: 26992838
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2021 Mar-Apr;39(2):407-412
pubmed: 33124575
J Rheumatol. 2002 Feb;29(2):288-91
pubmed: 11838846
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Sep;74(9):1706-13
pubmed: 24834926