Delta and Omicron: protective measures and SARS-CoV-2 infections in day care centres in Germany in the 4th and 5th wave of the pandemic 2021/2022.
COVID-19
Early childhood education and care (ECEC)
Germany
SARS-CoV-2
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 11 2022
17 11 2022
Historique:
received:
20
04
2022
accepted:
02
11
2022
entrez:
18
11
2022
pubmed:
19
11
2022
medline:
22
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
During the five waves of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic so far, German early childhood education and care (ECEC) centres implemented various protective measures, such as wearing a face mask, fixed children-staff groups or regular ventilation. In addition, parents and ECEC staff were increasingly vaccinated throughout 2021. During the 4th wave, variant of concern (VOC) Delta-driven transmission indicators reached record values at the end of 2021. Those values were even exceeded in the 5th wave at the beginning of 2022 when Omicron dominated. We examine which factors facilitated or prevented infection with SARS-CoV-2 in ECEC centres, and if these differed between different phases within wave 4 (Delta) and 5 (Omicron). Since August 2020, a weekly online survey among approximately 8000 ECEC managers has been conducted, monitoring both incident SARS-CoV-2 infections and protective measures taken. We included data from calendar week 26/2021 to 05/2022. We estimate the probability of any infections and the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections in children, parents and staff using random-effect-within-between (REWB) panel models for binomial and count data. While children, parents and staff of ECEC centres with a high proportion of children from families with low socioeconomic status (SES) have a higher risk of infections in the beginning of wave 4 (OR up to 1.99 [1.56; 2.56]), this effect diminishes for children and parents with rising incidences. Protective measures, such as wearing face masks, tend to have more extensive effects with rising incidences in wave 5 (IRR up to 0.87 [0.8; 0.93]). Further, the protective effect of vaccination against infection among staff is decreasing from wave 4 to wave 5 (OR 0.3 [0.16; 0.55] to OR 0.95, [0.84; 1.07, n.s.]). The degree of transmission from staff to child and from staff to parent is decreasing from wave 4 to wave 5, while transmission from child to staff seems to increase. While Omicron seems to affect children and parents from ECEC centres with families with all SES levels more equally than Delta, the protective effect of vaccination against infection is decreasing and the effect of protective measures like face masks becomes increasingly important. In order to prevent massive closures of ECEC centres due to infection of staff, protective measures should be strictly adhered to, especially to protect staff in centres with a high proportion of children from families with low socioeconomic status.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
During the five waves of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic so far, German early childhood education and care (ECEC) centres implemented various protective measures, such as wearing a face mask, fixed children-staff groups or regular ventilation. In addition, parents and ECEC staff were increasingly vaccinated throughout 2021. During the 4th wave, variant of concern (VOC) Delta-driven transmission indicators reached record values at the end of 2021. Those values were even exceeded in the 5th wave at the beginning of 2022 when Omicron dominated. We examine which factors facilitated or prevented infection with SARS-CoV-2 in ECEC centres, and if these differed between different phases within wave 4 (Delta) and 5 (Omicron).
METHODS
Since August 2020, a weekly online survey among approximately 8000 ECEC managers has been conducted, monitoring both incident SARS-CoV-2 infections and protective measures taken. We included data from calendar week 26/2021 to 05/2022. We estimate the probability of any infections and the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections in children, parents and staff using random-effect-within-between (REWB) panel models for binomial and count data.
RESULTS
While children, parents and staff of ECEC centres with a high proportion of children from families with low socioeconomic status (SES) have a higher risk of infections in the beginning of wave 4 (OR up to 1.99 [1.56; 2.56]), this effect diminishes for children and parents with rising incidences. Protective measures, such as wearing face masks, tend to have more extensive effects with rising incidences in wave 5 (IRR up to 0.87 [0.8; 0.93]). Further, the protective effect of vaccination against infection among staff is decreasing from wave 4 to wave 5 (OR 0.3 [0.16; 0.55] to OR 0.95, [0.84; 1.07, n.s.]). The degree of transmission from staff to child and from staff to parent is decreasing from wave 4 to wave 5, while transmission from child to staff seems to increase.
CONCLUSION
While Omicron seems to affect children and parents from ECEC centres with families with all SES levels more equally than Delta, the protective effect of vaccination against infection is decreasing and the effect of protective measures like face masks becomes increasingly important. In order to prevent massive closures of ECEC centres due to infection of staff, protective measures should be strictly adhered to, especially to protect staff in centres with a high proportion of children from families with low socioeconomic status.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36397006
doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14521-x
pii: 10.1186/s12889-022-14521-x
pmc: PMC9670080
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2106Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Front Psychol. 2021 May 25;12:669432
pubmed: 34113297
Public Health. 2020 Dec;189:129-134
pubmed: 33227595
J Health Monit. 2020 Oct 09;5(Suppl 7):3-17
pubmed: 35146298
Infant Child Dev. 2021 Jul-Aug;30(4):e2241
pubmed: 34220356
J Health Monit. 2020 Oct 09;5(Suppl 7):18-29
pubmed: 35146299
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Dec;5(12):1595-1597
pubmed: 34811491
N Engl J Med. 2022 Apr 21;386(16):1532-1546
pubmed: 35249272
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4):
pubmed: 33431650
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2131137
pubmed: 34698850
Pediatrics. 2021 Sep;148(3):
pubmed: 34112660
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;20(8):920-928
pubmed: 32422201
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2141227
pubmed: 35084484
Epidemiol Infect. 2022 Jul 08;150:e141
pubmed: 35912971
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Mar 11;21(1):257
pubmed: 33706702
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 14;22(1):98
pubmed: 35031025
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021 Apr;5(4):256-264
pubmed: 33571450
Pediatrics. 2021 Oct;148(4):
pubmed: 34321339
J Public Health (Oxf). 2020 Nov 23;42(4):698-703
pubmed: 32776102
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2140906
pubmed: 34940869
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2232760
pubmed: 36136332
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 20;9:780039
pubmed: 34988054