The Plasma Environment of Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko.
Journal
Space science reviews
ISSN: 0038-6308
Titre abrégé: Space Sci Rev
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100971458
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
03
05
2021
accepted:
20
10
2022
entrez:
18
11
2022
pubmed:
19
11
2022
medline:
19
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The environment of a comet is a fascinating and unique laboratory to study plasma processes and the formation of structures such as shocks and discontinuities from electron scales to ion scales and above. The European Space Agency's Rosetta mission collected data for more than two years, from the rendezvous with comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko in August 2014 until the final touch-down of the spacecraft end of September 2016. This escort phase spanned a large arc of the comet's orbit around the Sun, including its perihelion and corresponding to heliocentric distances between 3.8 AU and 1.24 AU. The length of the active mission together with this span in heliocentric and cometocentric distances make the Rosetta data set unique and much richer than sets obtained with previous cometary probes. Here, we review the results from the Rosetta mission that pertain to the plasma environment. We detail all known sources and losses of the plasma and typical processes within it. The findings from in-situ plasma measurements are complemented by remote observations of emissions from the plasma. Overviews of the methods and instruments used in the study are given as well as a short review of the Rosetta mission. The long duration of the Rosetta mission provides the opportunity to better understand how the importance of these processes changes depending on parameters like the outgassing rate and the solar wind conditions. We discuss how the shape and existence of large scale structures depend on these parameters and how the plasma within different regions of the plasma environment can be characterised. We end with a non-exhaustive list of still open questions, as well as suggestions on how to answer them in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36397966
doi: 10.1007/s11214-022-00931-1
pii: 931
pmc: PMC9649581
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
65Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing InterestsThe authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Science. 2015 Jan 23;347(6220):aaa0276
pubmed: 25613892
Science. 1986 Apr 18;232(4748):356-61
pubmed: 17792144
Phys Rev Lett. 2019 Aug 2;123(5):055101
pubmed: 31491291
Science. 2015 Jan 23;347(6220):aaa0571
pubmed: 25613894
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2015 Nov;92(5):051102
pubmed: 26651639
Science. 1986 Apr 18;232(4748):377-81
pubmed: 17792149
Science. 2015 Jan 23;347(6220):aaa0709
pubmed: 25613896
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2017 Jul 13;375(2097):
pubmed: 28554974
Science. 2015 Jul 31;349(6247):aab0689
pubmed: 26228156
Phys Rev Lett. 2017 May 19;118(20):205101
pubmed: 28581804
Nature. 2015 Mar 12;519(7542):207-10
pubmed: 25762281
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2017 Jul 13;375(2097):
pubmed: 28554971
Phys Rev Lett. 2019 Jun 21;122(24):245001
pubmed: 31322368
Science. 2007 May 11;316(5826):870-5
pubmed: 17495166
Nat Commun. 2019 Nov 28;10(1):5418
pubmed: 31780664
Adv Space Res. 1989;9(10):293-8
pubmed: 11537306
Astron Astrophys. 2019 Oct;630:
pubmed: 31631896
Space Sci Rev. 2020;216(8):130
pubmed: 33184519
Rep Prog Phys. 2012 Jun;75(6):066901
pubmed: 22790651
Icarus. 2020 Jan;335:
pubmed: 31631900
Science. 2015 Jan 23;347(6220):aaa1044
pubmed: 25613897
Phys Rev Lett. 2011 Dec 9;107(24):245005
pubmed: 22243008
Science. 2015 Jul 31;349(6247):aab0673
pubmed: 26228155
Geophys Res Lett. 2015 Jul 16;42(13):5125-5131
pubmed: 27656008
Science. 2006 Mar 10;311(5766):1393-401
pubmed: 16527964
Nature. 2016 Aug 31;537(7618):73-5
pubmed: 27582221
Nature. 2015 Oct 29;526(7575):678-81
pubmed: 26511578
J Geophys Res Space Phys. 2016 Jan;121(1):804-816
pubmed: 27134807
Science. 1986 Apr 18;232(4748):382-5
pubmed: 17792150