Adjuvant versus on-progression Gamma Knife radiosurgery for residual nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: a matched-cohort analysis.

hypopituitarism nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma pituitary surgery stereotactic radiosurgery

Journal

Journal of neurosurgery
ISSN: 1933-0693
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0253357

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Nov 2022
Historique:
received: 15 08 2022
accepted: 07 10 2022
entrez: 19 11 2022
pubmed: 20 11 2022
medline: 20 11 2022
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Radiological progression occurs in 50%-60% of residual nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a safe and effective management option for residual NFPAs, but there is no consensus on its optimal timing. This study aims to define the optimal timing of SRS for residual NFPAs. This retrospective, multicenter study involved 375 patients with residual NFPAs managed with SRS. The patients were divided into adjuvant (ADJ; treated for stable residual NFPA within 6 months of resection) and progression (PRG) cohorts (treated for residual NFPA progression). Factors associated with tumor progression and clinical deterioration were analyzed. Following propensity-score matching, each cohort consisted of 130 patients. At last follow-up, tumor control was achieved in 93.1% of patients in the ADJ cohort and in 96.2% of patients in the PRG cohort (HR 1.6, 95% CI 0.55-4.9, p = 0.37). Hypopituitarism was associated with a maximum point dose of > 8 Gy to the pituitary stalk (HR 4.5, 95% CI 1.6-12.6, p = 0.004). No statistically significant difference was noted in crude new-onset hypopituitarism rates (risk difference [RD] = -0.8%, p > 0.99) or visual deficits (RD = -2.3%, p = 0.21) between the two cohorts at the last follow-up. The median time from resection to new hypopituitarism was longer in the PRG cohort (58.9 vs 29.7 months, p = 0.01). SRS at residual NFPA progression does not appear to alter the probability of tumor control or hormonal/visual deficits compared with adjuvant SRS. Deferral of radiosurgical management to the time of radiological progression could significantly prolong the time to radiosurgically induced pituitary dysfunction. A lower maximum point dose (< 8 Gy) to the pituitary stalk portended a more favorable chance of preserving pituitary function after SRS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36401547
doi: 10.3171/2022.10.JNS221873
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-7

Auteurs

Georgios Mantziaris (G)

1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Stylianos Pikis (S)

1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Tomas Chytka (T)

2Department of Radiation and Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.

Roman Liščák (R)

2Department of Radiation and Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.

Kimball Sheehan (K)

1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Darrah Sheehan (D)

1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Selcuk Peker (S)

3Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Yavuz Samanci (Y)

3Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Shray K Bindal (SK)

4Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Ajay Niranjan (A)

4Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

L Dade Lunsford (LD)

4Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Rupinder Kaur (R)

5Department of Neurosurgery and Radiotherapy, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Renu Madan (R)

5Department of Neurosurgery and Radiotherapy, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Manjul Tripathi (M)

5Department of Neurosurgery and Radiotherapy, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Dhiraj J Pangal (DJ)

6Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California.

Ben A Strickland (BA)

6Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California.

Gabriel Zada (G)

6Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California.

Anne-Marie Langlois (AM)

7Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherché du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.

David Mathieu (D)

7Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherché du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.

Ronald E Warnick (RE)

8Gamma Knife Center, Jewish Hospital, Mayfield Clinic, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Samir Patel (S)

9Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; and.

Zayda Minier (Z)

10Department of Radiology, Dominican Gamma Knife Center and CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.

Herwin Speckter (H)

10Department of Radiology, Dominican Gamma Knife Center and CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.

Zhiyuan Xu (Z)

1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Rithika Kormath Anand (R)

1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Jason P Sheehan (JP)

1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Classifications MeSH