Assessment of patients' perceptions towards embryo disposition after donation of embryos to a research biobank.
Embryo disposition
Journal
Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
ISSN: 1573-7330
Titre abrégé: J Assist Reprod Genet
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9206495
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
25
07
2022
accepted:
10
11
2022
pubmed:
20
11
2022
medline:
18
1
2023
entrez:
19
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To explore perceptions towards embryo disposition among patients donating excess embryos to a research biobank. Cross-sectional study of survey responses collected as part of enrollment in a research biobank. Patients are asked questions regarding the difficulty of their disposition decision, their alternative disposition choice if donation to research was not available, quality of the counseling they received, and if additional counseling throughout their treatment would have been beneficial. Survey responses use 5-point Likert scales, with "1" being lowest/least and "5" being highest/most. A total of 157 men and 163 women enrolled in the biobank. Median scores for difficulty of disposition decision were 3 for females and 2 for males, and for quality of counseling, the median scores were 4 for females and 3 for males. Seventy percent of patients would have chosen to discard their excess embryos had donation to research not been an option. Statistical analyses showed no significant difference in responses based on variations in race, religion, sexual orientation, and infertility diagnoses. Concordance of responses within heterosexual couples was tested and found to be poor to moderate. Assessing patients' perceptions towards embryo disposition after donation of their excess embryos to a research biobank affords a unique perspective. The difficulty of the disposition decision, the tendency to discard embryos in the absence of a means for donation to research, and the poor agreement between heterosexual partners highlight the importance of donation to research as an accessible disposition option and the need for a personalized approach to counseling and consenting for embryo disposition.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36401676
doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02659-x
pii: 10.1007/s10815-022-02659-x
pmc: PMC9676815
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
153-159Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Jun;20(7):880-91
pubmed: 20413349
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82
pubmed: 23092060
Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Sep-Oct;20(5):641-55
pubmed: 24907125
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Nov;37(11):2797-2804
pubmed: 32816130
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2022 Mar;14:251-264
pubmed: 35165660
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2013 Mar;16(1):31-4
pubmed: 23448677
F S Sci. 2022 Aug;3(3):228-236
pubmed: 35977803
Hum Reprod. 2016 Jul;31(7):1508-14
pubmed: 27165623
Hum Reprod. 2012 Feb;27(2):506-14
pubmed: 22171076
Fertil Steril. 2021 Feb;115(2):274-281
pubmed: 33579521
Fertil Steril. 2011 May;95(6):1980-4, 1984.e1
pubmed: 21411080
Regen Med. 2020 Jul;15(7):1905-1917
pubmed: 32799737
F S Rep. 2020 Sep 28;1(2):71-77
pubmed: 34223221
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Aug;36(8):1555-1560
pubmed: 31134411
Cell Stem Cell. 2011 Apr 8;8(4):360-2
pubmed: 21474099
Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(2):499-509
pubmed: 19061998
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 23;19(5):
pubmed: 35270268
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;32(5):380-384
pubmed: 32739976
Fertil Steril. 2006 Jun;85(6):1623-30
pubmed: 16678178
Hum Reprod. 2011 Mar;26(3):646-54
pubmed: 21216789
Fertil Steril. 2010 Nov;94(6):2069-72
pubmed: 20359706