Study of the Effect of Different Breast Implant Surfaces on Capsule Formation and Host Inflammatory Response in an Animal Model.
Journal
Aesthetic surgery journal
ISSN: 1527-330X
Titre abrégé: Aesthet Surg J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9707469
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 03 2023
15 03 2023
Historique:
pubmed:
20
11
2022
medline:
21
3
2023
entrez:
19
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Breast implants are biomaterials eliciting a physiological and mandatory foreign body response. The authors designed an animal study to investigate the impact of different implant surfaces on the formation of the periprosthetic capsule, the inflammatory response, and the cellular composition. The authors implanted 1 scaled-down version of breast implants by different manufactures on 70 female Sprague Dawley rats. Animals were divided into 5 groups of 14 animals. Group A received a smooth implant (Ra ≈ 0.5 µm) according to the ISO 14607-2018 classification, Group B a smooth implant (Ra ≈ 3.2 µm), Group C a smooth implant (Ra ≈ 5 µm), Group D a macrotextured implant (Ra ≈ 62 µm), and Group E a macrotextured implant (Ra ≈ 75 µm). At 60 days, all animals received a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 35 animals were killed and their capsules sent for histology (capsule thickness, inflammatory infiltrate) and immunohistochemistry analysis (cellular characterization). The remaining animals repeated the MRI at 120 days and were killed following the same protocol. MRI showed a thinner capsule in the smooth implants (Groups A-C) at 60 days (P < .001) but not at 120 days (P = .039), confirmed with histology both at 60 days (P = .005) and 120 days (P < .001). Smooth implants (Groups A-C) presented a mild inflammatory response at 60 days that was maintained at 120 days and a high M2-Macrophage concentration (anti-inflammatory). Our study confirms that smooth implants form a thinner capsule, inferior inflammatory infiltrate, and a cellular composition that indicates a mild host inflammatory response. A new host inflammatory response classification is elaborated classifying breast implants into mild, moderate, and high.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Breast implants are biomaterials eliciting a physiological and mandatory foreign body response.
OBJECTIVES
The authors designed an animal study to investigate the impact of different implant surfaces on the formation of the periprosthetic capsule, the inflammatory response, and the cellular composition.
METHODS
The authors implanted 1 scaled-down version of breast implants by different manufactures on 70 female Sprague Dawley rats. Animals were divided into 5 groups of 14 animals. Group A received a smooth implant (Ra ≈ 0.5 µm) according to the ISO 14607-2018 classification, Group B a smooth implant (Ra ≈ 3.2 µm), Group C a smooth implant (Ra ≈ 5 µm), Group D a macrotextured implant (Ra ≈ 62 µm), and Group E a macrotextured implant (Ra ≈ 75 µm). At 60 days, all animals received a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 35 animals were killed and their capsules sent for histology (capsule thickness, inflammatory infiltrate) and immunohistochemistry analysis (cellular characterization). The remaining animals repeated the MRI at 120 days and were killed following the same protocol.
RESULTS
MRI showed a thinner capsule in the smooth implants (Groups A-C) at 60 days (P < .001) but not at 120 days (P = .039), confirmed with histology both at 60 days (P = .005) and 120 days (P < .001). Smooth implants (Groups A-C) presented a mild inflammatory response at 60 days that was maintained at 120 days and a high M2-Macrophage concentration (anti-inflammatory).
CONCLUSIONS
Our study confirms that smooth implants form a thinner capsule, inferior inflammatory infiltrate, and a cellular composition that indicates a mild host inflammatory response. A new host inflammatory response classification is elaborated classifying breast implants into mild, moderate, and high.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36402143
pii: 6833543
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjac301
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biocompatible Materials
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
506-515Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Aesthetic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.