Vulnerability, ageism, and health: is it helpful to label older adults as a vulnerable group in health care?
Ageism
Ethics
Healthcare
Olderadults
Vulnerability
Journal
Medicine, health care, and philosophy
ISSN: 1572-8633
Titre abrégé: Med Health Care Philos
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9815900
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
21
07
2022
accepted:
08
11
2022
revised:
27
09
2022
pubmed:
20
11
2022
medline:
8
3
2023
entrez:
19
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite the diversity of ageing, society and academics often describe and label older persons as a vulnerable group. As the term vulnerability is frequently interchangeably used with frailty, dependence, or loss of autonomy, a connection between older age and deficits is promoted. Concerning this, the question arises to what extent it may be helpful to refer to older persons as vulnerable specifically in the context of health care. After analyzing different notions of vulnerability, I argue that it is illegitimate to conclude that older age is related to increased vulnerability. Much more, identifying older adults as a vulnerable group is closely related to ageism and can be associated with paternalistic benevolence and a tendency to overprotection, especially within health care. Additionally, even though older adults are more often in situations of increased vulnerability due to their potentially higher need for health care, I argue further that older adults mainly become a vulnerable group due to ageism. In this way, it can be concluded that the vulnerability of older adults does not originate in certain attributes of the group, but arises from a characteristic of society and, in turn, health personnel, namely ageism. Labeling older adults as vulnerable therefore is only helpful, when it is used to raise awareness of the widespread ageism in society, in this context, especially in the setting of health care, and the negative consequences thereof for older adults.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36402852
doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10129-5
pii: 10.1007/s11019-022-10129-5
pmc: PMC9676836
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
133-142Subventions
Organisme : Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
ID : Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Indian Med Assoc. 2009 Jun;107(6):403-5
pubmed: 19886379
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jan 18;76(2):e49-e52
pubmed: 32296840
Bioethics. 2018 May;32(4):233-239
pubmed: 29676498
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):e0220857
pubmed: 31940338
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Aug 16;23(1):84
pubmed: 35974362
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jul-Oct;32(4-5):515-525
pubmed: 32491963
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Dec 20;20(1):538
pubmed: 33342426
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018 Jan;16(1):140-232
pubmed: 29324562
Bioethics. 2015 Jul;29(6):448-50
pubmed: 25186280
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012 Jun;18(5):585-9
pubmed: 22494661
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Jan;70(1):269-280
pubmed: 34669967
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jul-Oct;32(4-5):506-514
pubmed: 32507060
CMAJ. 2018 Mar 19;190(11):E308-E309
pubmed: 29555859
Nurs Ethics. 2021 Aug;28(5):750-765
pubmed: 33430706
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2020 Sep - Oct;55(5):266-271
pubmed: 32718581
Am J Bioeth. 2004 Summer;4(3):44-9
pubmed: 16192138