Clinical Impact of Severe Obesity in Patients with Lymphoedema.
Costs
Lymphoedema
Severe obesity
Treatment
Journal
European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery
ISSN: 1532-2165
Titre abrégé: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9512728
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2023
03 2023
Historique:
received:
20
04
2022
revised:
07
11
2022
accepted:
14
11
2022
pubmed:
21
11
2022
medline:
8
3
2023
entrez:
20
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
With the rate of obesity increasing worldwide, patients with lymphoedema with and without a concomitant diagnosis of severe obesity (SO) were compared in regard to their baseline demographics, health related characteristics, treatment plans, and patient outcomes. This was a retrospective observational cohort study. The IBM MarketScan database was examined (2013 - 2019) for patients with a new diagnosis of lymphoedema. Of 60 284 patients with lymphoedema identified, 6 588 had SO defined by a body mass index > 40 kg/m SO and lymphoedema diagnosis increased two fold from 2013 to 2019. The lymphoedema SO+ group was younger (57.8 vs. 60.8 years, p < .001) and with a higher proportion of men (37.7% vs. 24.9%, p < .001) than the lymphoedema SO- group. More comorbidities were observed in the lymphoedema SO+ group than the lymphoedema SO- group: diabetes 46.0% vs. 24.9 % (p < .001), heart failure 18.3% vs. 7.4% (p < .001), hypertension 75.0% vs. 47.6% (p < .001), and renal disease 24.8% vs. 11.9% (p < .001). Use of diuretics in the lymphoedema SO+ group was greater: 57.6% vs. 38.0% (p < .001). Patients with lymphoedema SO+ had higher risk of cellulitis: 34.5% vs. 13.5% (p < .001). Specific lymphoedema treatment was given more often to lymphoedema SO-: 66.3% vs. 64.3% (p = .003). This was significant for manual lymphatic drainage (46.6% vs. 40.0%; p < .001) and physical therapy (55.4% vs. 51.6%; p<.001), but not for compression garments (18.2% vs. 17.7%; p = .38). However, more patients with lymphoedema SO+ received pneumatic compression device treatment: 20.9% vs. 13.7% (p < .001). There was an increase in SO associated lymphoedema. Patients with lymphoedema SO+ have over a two and half fold increase in cellulitis incidence, with a significant increase in medical resource use and cost. Despite this, patients with lymphoedema and SO receive less specific therapy such as compression, which has proven to reduce cellulitis incidence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36403939
pii: S1078-5884(22)00759-6
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.11.014
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
406-413Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.