Validation of the clinical consensus recommendations on the management of fracture risk in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes.
Bone fragility
Bone-active drugs
Fracture risk
Postmenopausal women
Treatment
Type 2 diabetes
Vertebral fractures
Journal
Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD
ISSN: 1590-3729
Titre abrégé: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9111474
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2023
01 2023
Historique:
received:
13
07
2022
revised:
14
09
2022
accepted:
07
10
2022
pubmed:
21
11
2022
medline:
7
1
2023
entrez:
20
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Bone fragility is recognized as a complication of type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, the fracture risk in T2D is underestimated using the classical assessment tools. An expert panel suggested the diagnostic approaches for the detection of T2D patients worthy of bone-active treatment. The aim of the study was to apply these algorithms to a cohort of T2D women to validate them in clinical practice. The presence of T2D-specific fracture risk factors (T2D ≥ 10 years, ≥1 T2D complications, insulin or thiazolidinedione use, poor glycaemic control) was assessed at baseline in 107 postmenopausal T2D women. In all patients at baseline and in 34 patients after a median follow-up of 60.2 months we retrospectively evaluated bone mineral density and clinical and morphometric vertebral fractures. No patient was treated with bone-active drug. Following the protocols, 34 (31.8%) and 73 (68.2%) patients would have been pharmacologically and conservatively treated, respectively. Among 49 patients without both clinical fractures and major T2D-related risk factors, who would have been, therefore, conservatively followed-up without vertebral fracture assessment, only one showed a prevalent vertebral fracture (sensitivity 90%, negative predictive value 98%). The two patients who experienced an incident fracture would have been pharmacologically treated at baseline. The clinical consensus recommendations showed a very good sensitivity in identifying T2D postmenopausal women at high fracture risk. Among those with treatment indication as many as 13% of patients experienced an incident fracture, and, conversely, among those without treatment indication no incident fractures were observed.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Bone fragility is recognized as a complication of type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, the fracture risk in T2D is underestimated using the classical assessment tools. An expert panel suggested the diagnostic approaches for the detection of T2D patients worthy of bone-active treatment. The aim of the study was to apply these algorithms to a cohort of T2D women to validate them in clinical practice.
METHODS AND RESULTS
The presence of T2D-specific fracture risk factors (T2D ≥ 10 years, ≥1 T2D complications, insulin or thiazolidinedione use, poor glycaemic control) was assessed at baseline in 107 postmenopausal T2D women. In all patients at baseline and in 34 patients after a median follow-up of 60.2 months we retrospectively evaluated bone mineral density and clinical and morphometric vertebral fractures. No patient was treated with bone-active drug. Following the protocols, 34 (31.8%) and 73 (68.2%) patients would have been pharmacologically and conservatively treated, respectively. Among 49 patients without both clinical fractures and major T2D-related risk factors, who would have been, therefore, conservatively followed-up without vertebral fracture assessment, only one showed a prevalent vertebral fracture (sensitivity 90%, negative predictive value 98%). The two patients who experienced an incident fracture would have been pharmacologically treated at baseline.
CONCLUSIONS
The clinical consensus recommendations showed a very good sensitivity in identifying T2D postmenopausal women at high fracture risk. Among those with treatment indication as many as 13% of patients experienced an incident fracture, and, conversely, among those without treatment indication no incident fractures were observed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36404237
pii: S0939-4753(22)00416-1
doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2022.10.004
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
158-167Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.