Burnout of Support Personnel in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory.
Burnout
Cardiac catheterization
Maslach Burnout Inventory
Nurse
Journal
Cardiology research
ISSN: 1923-2829
Titre abrégé: Cardiol Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101557543
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
26
09
2022
accepted:
11
10
2022
entrez:
21
11
2022
pubmed:
22
11
2022
medline:
22
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Healthcare professionals experience stressors in the workplace, putting them at elevated risk for burnout. The cardiac catheterization lab is a dynamic environment with high-acuity patients; however, little has been published investigating burnout syndrome among healthcare workers. The aim of the study was to identify the prevalence, demographic, and workload factors, which contribute to burnout syndrome among this population. This is a multicenter cross-sectional study assessing burnout with the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) among registered nurses and registered cardiac invasive specialists working in the catheterization/electrophysiology lab and cardiac observation unit at four hospital centers in the metro Detroit area. Of the 48 participants, 69% (n = 33) were female. The overall prevalence of burnout syndrome was 33% (n = 16). Significantly more males experienced burnout than females (P < 0.05). Of the participants experiencing burnout, a greater proportion worked in the catheterization lab compared to the cardiac observation unit (93.8% vs. 6.3%). Burned-out participants worked on average more day shifts, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) call shifts, and extended day shifts per month compared to those not experiencing burnout. The rate of burnout was significantly higher for individuals reporting increased stress during the pandemic (69% vs. 18%, P < 0.05). Registered nurses and registered cardiac invasive specialists working in the cardiac catheterization or electrophysiology lab experience elevated levels of burnout. Greater attention should be placed in identifying and optimizing workplace variables which contribute to burnout among this population.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Healthcare professionals experience stressors in the workplace, putting them at elevated risk for burnout. The cardiac catheterization lab is a dynamic environment with high-acuity patients; however, little has been published investigating burnout syndrome among healthcare workers. The aim of the study was to identify the prevalence, demographic, and workload factors, which contribute to burnout syndrome among this population.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
This is a multicenter cross-sectional study assessing burnout with the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) among registered nurses and registered cardiac invasive specialists working in the catheterization/electrophysiology lab and cardiac observation unit at four hospital centers in the metro Detroit area.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Of the 48 participants, 69% (n = 33) were female. The overall prevalence of burnout syndrome was 33% (n = 16). Significantly more males experienced burnout than females (P < 0.05). Of the participants experiencing burnout, a greater proportion worked in the catheterization lab compared to the cardiac observation unit (93.8% vs. 6.3%). Burned-out participants worked on average more day shifts, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) call shifts, and extended day shifts per month compared to those not experiencing burnout. The rate of burnout was significantly higher for individuals reporting increased stress during the pandemic (69% vs. 18%, P < 0.05).
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Registered nurses and registered cardiac invasive specialists working in the cardiac catheterization or electrophysiology lab experience elevated levels of burnout. Greater attention should be placed in identifying and optimizing workplace variables which contribute to burnout among this population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36405231
doi: 10.14740/cr1439
pmc: PMC9635780
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
283-288Informations de copyright
Copyright 2022, Alex et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
No conflict of interest to declare.
Références
Med Educ. 2007 Aug;41(8):788-800
pubmed: 17661887
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Apr;12(4):1695-1705
pubmed: 32395312
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep;13(9):e009179
pubmed: 32883103
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Jun;47(6):709-22
pubmed: 20138278
Emerg Med Australas. 2013 Dec;25(6):491-5
pubmed: 24118838
Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(12):1118-26
pubmed: 19918928
J Adv Nurs. 2016 Aug;72(8):1774-88
pubmed: 26940820
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Mar 15;35(4):1067-81
pubmed: 10732909
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Nov;211(5):609-19
pubmed: 20851643
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Feb;52(2):649-61
pubmed: 25468279
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Oct;23(10):806-13
pubmed: 24742780
BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 19;4(6):e004813
pubmed: 24948747
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan;12(1):e007081
pubmed: 30608874
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2005 Sep;4(3):234-41
pubmed: 15914085
BMC Nurs. 2019 Nov 21;18:57
pubmed: 31768129
Emerg Med J. 2015 Sep;32(9):722-7
pubmed: 25604324
Am J Infect Control. 2012 Aug;40(6):486-90
pubmed: 22854376
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 May;188(2):667-674
pubmed: 30051165
Sao Paulo Med J. 2012;130(5):282-8
pubmed: 23174866
Eur Heart J. 2002 Dec;23(24):1903-7
pubmed: 12536997
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Aug;290:113129
pubmed: 32485487
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 4;12(10):e0185781
pubmed: 28977041
Pediatrics. 2017 May;139(5):
pubmed: 28557756
Ann Surg. 2010 Jun;251(6):995-1000
pubmed: 19934755
Nurs Res. 2006 Mar-Apr;55(2):137-46
pubmed: 16601626