Correlates, motivating factors, and barriers of engaging in regular self-reflection among public health students in higher education-A mixed methods approach.
active learning
curriculum
education
pedagogy
public health
reflection
student engagement
undergraduate
Journal
Frontiers in public health
ISSN: 2296-2565
Titre abrégé: Front Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101616579
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
19
08
2022
accepted:
26
09
2022
entrez:
21
11
2022
pubmed:
22
11
2022
medline:
23
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite the wide implementation of self-reflection in higher education, the body of literature has predominantly focused on students from the clinical health sciences rather than public health. The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlates as well as to explore the motivating factors and barriers of engaging in regular self-reflection among public health students in higher education. We used a mixed methods approach (explanatory sequential design), comprising a cross-sectional survey (quantitative phase) followed by in-depth interviews (qualitative phase). We evaluated the association between reflection frequency as well as the perceptions and facilitators in reflection using the modified Breslow-Cox proportional hazards regression model. Prevalence ratio (PR) was generated. Thematic data analysis was carried out to analyse the qualitative data. Quantitative findings revealed being a regular reflector was positively associated with being more motivated to learn when one applied self-reflection (adjusted PR 1.60, 95% CI 1.17-2.20), the perception of being more prepared for a public health career in the future (adjusted PR 1.28, 95% CI 1.02-1.60), as well as being given enough opportunities to carry out self-reflection in the public health modules (adjusted PR 1.24, 95% CI 1.05-1.45). Qualitative findings revealed most students started their self-reflection mainly due to extrinsic factors such as institutional support, social support, teacher influence and environmental influence. Of these, the most prominent was teacher influence, indicating that they are key agents in promoting self-reflection. Students expressed that it would be important to cultivate intrinsic motivation to sustain their practice of self-reflection along the learning journey such as for the development of career-related professional skills. Other than intrinsic motivation, environmental influences were also important to promote continual reflection among students such as the availability of ample opportunities. Prominent barriers to address included external student factors such as the imbalanced power relationship between teacher and student, and internal student factors such as the perception that self-reflection was too cumbersome and time consuming.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36408036
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1023439
pmc: PMC9670312
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1023439Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Lim, Tan, Hoe, Teng, Müller, Azfar, Narayanasamy and Liow.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Nov;57:103251
pubmed: 34775226
Acad Med. 2012 May;87(5):603-9
pubmed: 22450174
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022 May 3;9:23821205221096106
pubmed: 35529178
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Nov 22;18(1):274
pubmed: 30466427
Med Educ. 2021 Oct;55(10):1161-1171
pubmed: 33978967
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Jan;36:401-6
pubmed: 26556704
Educ Prim Care. 2021 Nov;32(6):326-335
pubmed: 33988088
Korean J Med Educ. 2018 Mar;30(1):57-64
pubmed: 29510609
Clin Teach. 2021 Aug;18(4):409-416
pubmed: 33939280
Nurse Educ Pract. 2020 Mar;44:102754
pubmed: 32252016
Eur J Dent Educ. 2016 May;20(2):120-8
pubmed: 27525342
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011 Oct;16(4):529-45
pubmed: 21544551
J Public Health (Oxf). 2013 Jun;35(2):308-12
pubmed: 23077219
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003 Oct 20;3:21
pubmed: 14567763
Med Educ. 2004 Sep;38(9):950-7
pubmed: 15327676
J Dent Educ. 2021 May;85(5):606-614
pubmed: 33368282
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020 Dec;12(12):1437-1446
pubmed: 33092774
J Pers. 2020 Jun;88(3):584-595
pubmed: 31498427
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2021 Jul-Aug 01;42(4):227-231
pubmed: 34107520
Public Health Nurs. 2019 Mar;36(2):226-232
pubmed: 30460752
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Apr 20;12:22
pubmed: 22520632
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Nov;14(11):1058-1063
pubmed: 29233609
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013 Oct;18(4):617-26
pubmed: 22926807
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jul 22;21(1):394
pubmed: 34294058
Eur J Psychol. 2016 Nov 18;12(4):645-658
pubmed: 27872672
Women Birth. 2020 Jul;33(4):383-392
pubmed: 31296473
Perspect Med Educ. 2018 Dec;7(6):394-400
pubmed: 30353284
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Mar;43(3):333-43
pubmed: 16038911