Breast cancer diagnosis using frequency decomposition of surface motion of actuated breast tissue.
DIET
ROC
bootstrapping
breast cancer
diagnostic
digital image elasto tomography
screening
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
15
06
2022
accepted:
12
10
2022
entrez:
21
11
2022
pubmed:
22
11
2022
medline:
22
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This paper presents a computationally simple diagnostic algorithm for breast cancer using a non-invasive Digital Image Elasto Tomography (DIET) system. N=14 women (28 breasts, 13 cancerous) underwent a clinical trial using the DIET system following mammography diagnosis. The screening involves steady state sinusoidal vibrations applied to the free hanging breast with cameras used to capture tissue motion. Image reconstruction methods provide surface displacement data for approximately 14,000 reference points on the breast surface. The breast surface was segmented into four radial and four vertical segments. Frequency decomposition of reference point motion in each segment were compared. Segments on the same vertical band were hypothesised to have similar frequency content in healthy breasts, with significant differences indicating a tumor, based on the stiffness dependence of frequency and tumors being 4~10 times stiffer than healthy tissue. Twelve breast configurations were used to test robustness of the method. Optimal breast configuration for the 26 breasts analysed (13 cancerous, 13 healthy) resulted in 85% sensitivity and 77% specificity. Combining two opposite configurations resulted in correct diagnosis of all cancerous breasts with 100% sensitivity and 69% specificity. Bootstrapping was used to fit a smooth receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve to compare breast configuration performance with optimal area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85. Diagnostic results show diagnostic accuracy is comparable or better than mammography, with the added benefits of DIET screening, including portability, non-invasive screening, and no breast compression, with potential to increase screening participation and equity, improving outcomes for women.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36408185
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.969530
pmc: PMC9667108
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
969530Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Fitzjohn, Zhou and Chase.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2015 Nov 16;15(4):64-8
pubmed: 26614855
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 1997 Sep;1(3):161-70
pubmed: 11020818
N Engl J Med. 1998 Apr 16;338(16):1089-96
pubmed: 9545356
Am J Surg. 2019 Aug;218(2):411-418
pubmed: 30739738
Eur Radiol. 2007 Apr;17(4):873-87
pubmed: 17008989
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Med Phys. 2013 Jun;40(6):063503
pubmed: 23718614
J Thorac Oncol. 2010 Sep;5(9):1315-6
pubmed: 20736804
Radiology. 2008 Feb;246(2):376-83
pubmed: 18227537
N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27;353(17):1773-83
pubmed: 16169887
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2009 May;9(2):131-6
pubmed: 19485945
Breast Care (Basel). 2011;6(3):199-207
pubmed: 21779225
Radiology. 2018 Aug;288(2):343-352
pubmed: 29944088
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 01;10(6):e0128941
pubmed: 26029912
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Aug 7;94(15):1151-9
pubmed: 12165640
Radiology. 1986 Oct;161(1):49-51
pubmed: 3763885
Phys Med Biol. 2003 Jul 21;48(14):2183-98
pubmed: 12894978
Med Phys. 2021 Sep;48(9):4978-4992
pubmed: 34174093
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Jun;206(6):1341-50
pubmed: 27043979
Technol Health Care. 2007;15(4):259-71
pubmed: 17673835
Radiol Med. 2003 Jan-Feb;105(1-2):17-26
pubmed: 12700541
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2020;75:e1805
pubmed: 32725074
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90
pubmed: 21296855
Breast Cancer Res. 2015 May 01;17:63
pubmed: 25928287
JAMA. 2008 May 14;299(18):2151-63
pubmed: 18477782
Ann Oncol. 2009 Sep;20(9):1505-1510
pubmed: 19297316
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Sep 3;137(5 Part 1):347-60
pubmed: 12204020
Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Jul-Aug;32(4):1020-5
pubmed: 27648060
Int Breastfeed J. 2009 Nov 18;4:13
pubmed: 19922623
Lancet. 1996 Mar 30;347(9005):881-2
pubmed: 8622398
Clin Breast Cancer. 2015 Oct;15(5):313-24
pubmed: 25858446
Int J Cancer. 2017 Oct 1;141(7):1295-1306
pubmed: 28542784
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2012 Jul;23(5):567-73
pubmed: 22426022
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Feb;192(2):390-9
pubmed: 19155400
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2018 Sep;56(9):1715-1729
pubmed: 29524117
JAMA. 2012 Apr 4;307(13):1394-404
pubmed: 22474203
Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2008 Oct;4(4):e31
pubmed: 21611016
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Jun;139:109686
pubmed: 33819803
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Sep;94:13-15
pubmed: 28941754
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2016 Oct;15(5):1307-23
pubmed: 26862021
Radiology. 2004 Oct;233(1):255-65
pubmed: 15317954
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2008 Mar;46(3):205-12
pubmed: 17978841
Diagnostics (Basel). 2017 May 31;7(2):
pubmed: 28561776
Radiology. 2019 Apr;291(1):23-30
pubmed: 30777808
Med Phys. 2013 Nov;40(11):113503
pubmed: 24320474
Radiology. 2015 Mar;274(3):663-73
pubmed: 25329763
Ultrason Imaging. 1998 Oct;20(4):260-74
pubmed: 10197347
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984 Sep;143(3):493-7
pubmed: 6331727
Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):165-75
pubmed: 12355001
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Sep 1;20(17):3628-36
pubmed: 12202663
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Mar 21;52(6):1565-76
pubmed: 17327649