Percutaneous coronary intervention of native coronary artery versus saphenous vein graft in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Rationale and design of the multicenter, randomized PROCTOR trial.


Journal

American heart journal
ISSN: 1097-6744
Titre abrégé: Am Heart J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370465

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2023
Historique:
received: 12 07 2022
revised: 26 10 2022
accepted: 15 11 2022
pubmed: 22 11 2022
medline: 15 2 2023
entrez: 21 11 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) frequently require repeat percutaneous revascularization due to advanced age, progressive coronary artery disease and bypass graft failure. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of either the bypass graft or the native coronary artery may be performed. Randomized trials comparing native vessel PCI with bypass graft PCI are lacking and long-term outcomes have not been reported. PROCTOR (NCT03805048) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, that will include 584 patients presenting with saphenous vein graft (SVG) failure and a clinical indication for revascularization, as determined by the local Heart Team. The trial is designed to compare the clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients randomly allocated in a 1:1 fashion to either a strategy of native vessel PCI or SVG PCI. The primary study endpoint is a 3-year composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE: all-cause mortality, non-fatal target coronary territory myocardial infarction [MI], or clinically driven target coronary territory revascularization). At 3-years, after evaluation of the primary endpoint, follow-up invasive coronary angiography will be performed. Secondary endpoints comprise individual components of MACE at 1, 3 and 5 years follow-up, PCI-related MI, MI >48 hours after index PCI, target vessel failure, target lesion revascularization, renal failure requiring renal-replacement therapy, angiographic outcomes at 3-years and quality of life (delta Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Canadian Cardiovascular Society Grading Scale and Rose Dyspnea Scale). PROCTOR is the first randomized trial comparing an invasive strategy of native coronary artery PCI with SVG PCI in post-CABG patients presenting with SVG failure.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) frequently require repeat percutaneous revascularization due to advanced age, progressive coronary artery disease and bypass graft failure. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of either the bypass graft or the native coronary artery may be performed. Randomized trials comparing native vessel PCI with bypass graft PCI are lacking and long-term outcomes have not been reported.
METHODS
PROCTOR (NCT03805048) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, that will include 584 patients presenting with saphenous vein graft (SVG) failure and a clinical indication for revascularization, as determined by the local Heart Team. The trial is designed to compare the clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients randomly allocated in a 1:1 fashion to either a strategy of native vessel PCI or SVG PCI. The primary study endpoint is a 3-year composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE: all-cause mortality, non-fatal target coronary territory myocardial infarction [MI], or clinically driven target coronary territory revascularization). At 3-years, after evaluation of the primary endpoint, follow-up invasive coronary angiography will be performed. Secondary endpoints comprise individual components of MACE at 1, 3 and 5 years follow-up, PCI-related MI, MI >48 hours after index PCI, target vessel failure, target lesion revascularization, renal failure requiring renal-replacement therapy, angiographic outcomes at 3-years and quality of life (delta Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Canadian Cardiovascular Society Grading Scale and Rose Dyspnea Scale).
CONCLUSION
PROCTOR is the first randomized trial comparing an invasive strategy of native coronary artery PCI with SVG PCI in post-CABG patients presenting with SVG failure.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36410442
pii: S0002-8703(22)00296-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.11.014
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

20-29

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ruben W de Winter (RW)

Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Simon J Walsh (SJ)

Department of Cardiology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, United Kingdom.

Colm G Hanratty (CG)

Heart & Vascular Centre, Mater Private Day Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

James C Spratt (JC)

Department of Cardiology, St George's University Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Ralf W Sprengers (RW)

Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Jos W R Twisk (JWR)

Department of Epidemiology & Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Iris Vegting (I)

Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Stefan P Schumacher (SP)

Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Michiel J Bom (MJ)

Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Roel Hoek (R)

Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Niels J Verouden (NJ)

Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Ronak Delewi (R)

Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Alexander Nap (A)

Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Paul Knaapen (P)

Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: p.knaapen@amsterdamumc.nl.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH