Comparison of static and rolling logistic regression models on predicting invasive mechanical ventilation or death from COVID-19-A retrospective, multicentre study.

COVID death, clinical decision support, clinical prediction models logistic regression mechanical ventilation

Journal

The clinical respiratory journal
ISSN: 1752-699X
Titre abrégé: Clin Respir J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101315570

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Historique:
revised: 27 10 2022
received: 05 05 2022
accepted: 29 10 2022
pubmed: 23 11 2022
medline: 12 1 2023
entrez: 22 11 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

COVID-19 virus has undergone mutations, and the introduction of vaccines and effective treatments have changed its clinical severity. We hypothesized that models that evolve may better predict invasive mechanical ventilation or death than do static models. This retrospective study of adult patients with COVID-19 from six Michigan hospitals analysed 20 demographic, comorbid, vital sign and laboratory factors, one derived factor and nine factors representing changes in vital signs or laboratory values with time for their ability to predict death or invasive mechanical ventilation within the next 4, 8 or 24 h. Static logistic regression was constructed on the initial 300 patients and tested on the remaining 6741 patients. Rolling logistic regression was similarly constructed on the initial 300 patients, but then new patients were added, and older patients removed. Each new construction model was subsequently tested on the next patient. Static and rolling models were compared with receiver operator characteristic and precision-recall curves. Of the 7041 patients, 534 (7.6%) required invasive mechanical ventilation or died within 14 days of arrival. Rolling models improved discrimination (0.865 ± 0.010, 0.856 ± 0.007 and 0.843 ± 0.005 for the 4, 8 and 24-h models, respectively; all p < 0.001 compared with the static logistic regressions with 0.827 ± 0.011, 0.794 ± 0.012 and 0.735 ± 0.012, respectively). Similarly, the areas under the precision-recall curves improved from 0.006, 0.010 and 0.021 with the static models to 0.030, 0.045 and 0.076 for the 4-, 8- and 24-h rolling models, respectively, all p < 0.001. Rolling models with contemporaneous data maintained better metrics of performance than static models, which used older data.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36411722
doi: 10.1111/crj.13560
pmc: PMC9829617
doi:

Types de publication

Multicenter Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

40-49

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. The Clinical Respiratory Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb 1;49(2):209-214
pubmed: 33105150
Respirology. 2014 May;19(4):538-43
pubmed: 24661379
Chest. 1991 Dec;100(6):1619-36
pubmed: 1959406
Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;49(11):1895-1900
pubmed: 34259660
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jan 7;10(1):1-11
pubmed: 35071500
Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36
pubmed: 7063747
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 25;16(6):e0253767
pubmed: 34170950
J Anesth. 2021 Dec;35(6):827-836
pubmed: 34392404
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2022 Apr;53(3):567-575
pubmed: 34554359
Crit Care Med. 1992 Jun;20(6):864-74
pubmed: 1597042
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 04;10(3):e0118432
pubmed: 25738806
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0254066
pubmed: 34242273
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Mar;126(3):578-589
pubmed: 33454051
QJM. 2001 Oct;94(10):521-6
pubmed: 11588210
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 5;15(11):e0241824
pubmed: 33152008
Trends Immunol. 2020 May;41(5):355-359
pubmed: 32249063
Clin Respir J. 2023 Jan;17(1):40-49
pubmed: 36411722
JAMA. 2020 Oct 6;324(13):1330-1341
pubmed: 32876694
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Apr 21;104(6):2176-2184
pubmed: 33882025
BMJ Innov. 2021 Apr;7(2):261-270
pubmed: 34192015
Biomedicines. 2021 Aug 18;9(8):
pubmed: 34440240
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):403-416
pubmed: 33378609
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Dec;11:100243
pubmed: 34751263
Crit Care Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):e113-21
pubmed: 26901559
J Math Psychol. 1998 Jun;42(2/3):327-55
pubmed: 9710554
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;49(12):1373-9
pubmed: 8970487
J Crit Care. 2021 Oct;65:1-8
pubmed: 34052780

Auteurs

Milo Engoren (M)

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Carlo Pancaro (C)

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Nicholas S Yeldo (NS)

Department of Anesthesiology, Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

Lotfi S Kerzabi (LS)

Department of Anesthesiology, Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

Nicholas Douville (N)

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH