TEGDMA-Functionalized Dicalcium Phosphate Dihydrate Resin-Based Composites Prevent Secondary Caries in an In Vitro Biofilm Model.

DCPD bioreactor caries model micro-CT secondary caries

Journal

Journal of functional biomaterials
ISSN: 2079-4983
Titre abrégé: J Funct Biomater
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101570734

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Nov 2022
Historique:
received: 21 09 2022
revised: 03 11 2022
accepted: 04 11 2022
entrez: 22 11 2022
pubmed: 23 11 2022
medline: 23 11 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study evaluated the efficacy of experimental TEGDMA-functionalized dicalcium phosphate dihydrate (T-DCPD) filler-based resin-based composites (RBC) in preventing caries lesions around the restoration margins (secondary caries, SC). Standardized Class-II cavities were made in sound molars with the cervical margin in dentin. Cavities were filled with a commercial resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC) or experimental RBCs containing a bisGMA-TEGDMA resin blend and one of the following inorganic fractions: 60 wt.% Ba glass (RBC-0); 40 wt.% Ba glass and 20 wt.% T-DCPD (RBC-20); or 20 wt.% Ba glass and 40 wt.% T-DCPD (RBC-40). An open-system bioreactor produced Streptococcus mutans biofilm-driven SC. Specimens were scanned using micro-CT to evaluate demineralization depths. Scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy characterized the specimen surfaces, and antimicrobial activity, buffering effect, and ion uptake by the biofilms were also evaluated. ANOVA and Tukey’s tests were applied at p < 0.05. RBC-0 and RBC-20 showed SC development in dentin, while RBC-40 and RMGIC significantly reduced the lesion depth at the restoration margin (p < 0.0001). Initial enamel demineralization could be observed only around the RBC-0 and RBC-20 restorations. Direct antibiofilm activity can explain SC reduction by RMGIC, whereas a buffering effect on the acidogenicity of biofilm can explain the behavior of RBC-40. Experimental RBC with CaP-releasing functionalized T-DCPD filler could prevent SC with the same efficacy as F-releasing materials.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36412873
pii: jfb13040232
doi: 10.3390/jfb13040232
pmc: PMC9680503
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

J Inorg Biochem. 2011 Aug;105(8):1060-5
pubmed: 21726768
Dent Mater. 2019 Oct;35(10):1450-1463
pubmed: 31400984
Acta Biomater. 2012 Feb;8(2):474-87
pubmed: 21856456
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2018 Aug 30;26(3):122-128
pubmed: 30063306
Dent Clin North Am. 2019 Oct;63(4):715-729
pubmed: 31470925
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019 Jul;107(5):1542-1550
pubmed: 30296360
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2015 Nov;103(8):1670-8
pubmed: 25611488
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2011 Dec;11(4):180-2
pubmed: 22078826
Dent Mater. 2015 Nov;31(11):e247-77
pubmed: 26410151
Dent Clin North Am. 2017 Oct;61(4):669-687
pubmed: 28886763
Dent Mater. 2013 Feb;29(2):199-210
pubmed: 23138046
Dent Mater. 2016 Dec;32(12):1586-1599
pubmed: 27720423
J Dent Res. 2016 Jul;95(8):875-81
pubmed: 27146702
J Funct Biomater. 2020 Jun 01;11(2):
pubmed: 32492906
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 19;8(1):17016
pubmed: 30451901
Heliyon. 2020 May 21;6(5):e03969
pubmed: 32462087
Quintessence Int. 2000 Mar;31(3):165-79
pubmed: 11203922
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2014 Dec;45:122-6
pubmed: 25491810
Bioact Mater. 2018 Dec 18;4(1):43-55
pubmed: 30582079
J Dent Res. 1987 Nov;66(11):1640-3
pubmed: 10872398
Dent Mater. 2021 Feb;37(2):296-310
pubmed: 33441250
Biomaterials. 1996 May;17(10):1019-23
pubmed: 8736738
Int Dent J. 1992 Jun;42(3):127-38
pubmed: 1500208
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Aug;84:161-167
pubmed: 29783203
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 9;12(1):5994
pubmed: 35397624
Dent Mater. 2013 Feb;29(2):231-40
pubmed: 23140916
J Dent Res. 2019 Jul;98(7):725-730
pubmed: 31219410
J Dent. 2022 Dec;127:104333
pubmed: 36257513
Dent Mater. 2007 Jan;23(1):2-8
pubmed: 16417916
Dent Mater. 2016 Dec;32(12):e374-e381
pubmed: 27665147
Adv Dent Res. 1990 Jun;4:4-9
pubmed: 2206212
Dent Mater. 2011 Jan;27(1):29-38
pubmed: 21093034
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2017 Jul;28(7):108
pubmed: 28540581
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008 Apr;19(4):1823-9
pubmed: 18157508

Auteurs

Andrei Cristian Ionescu (AC)

Oral Microbiology and Biomaterials Laboratory, Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Via Pascal, 36, 20133 Milan, Italy.

Sebastian Hahnel (S)

Clinic of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 12, Haus 1, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Regensburg University Medical Center, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93042 Regensburg, Germany.

Marina D S Chiari (MDS)

Department of Biomaterials and Oral Biology, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 2227, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo 05508-900, SP, Brazil.

Andreas König (A)

Clinic of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 12, Haus 1, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

Paolo Delvecchio (P)

School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Via Cadore, 48, 20900 Monza, Italy.

Roberto Ruggiero Braga (RR)

Department of Biomaterials and Oral Biology, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 2227, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo 05508-900, SP, Brazil.

Vanessa Zambelli (V)

School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Via Cadore, 48, 20900 Monza, Italy.

Eugenio Brambilla (E)

Oral Microbiology and Biomaterials Laboratory, Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Via Pascal, 36, 20133 Milan, Italy.

Classifications MeSH