Calibration of computational tools for missense variant pathogenicity classification and ClinGen recommendations for PP3/BP4 criteria.
ACMG/AMP recommendations
PP3/BP4 criteria
clinical classification
computational predictors
in silico tools
likelihood ratio
posterior probability
variant interpretation
Journal
American journal of human genetics
ISSN: 1537-6605
Titre abrégé: Am J Hum Genet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370475
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2022
01 12 2022
Historique:
received:
18
03
2022
accepted:
21
10
2022
pubmed:
23
11
2022
medline:
7
12
2022
entrez:
22
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recommendations from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) for interpreting sequence variants specify the use of computational predictors as "supporting" level of evidence for pathogenicity or benignity using criteria PP3 and BP4, respectively. However, score intervals defined by tool developers, and ACMG/AMP recommendations that require the consensus of multiple predictors, lack quantitative support. Previously, we described a probabilistic framework that quantified the strengths of evidence (supporting, moderate, strong, very strong) within ACMG/AMP recommendations. We have extended this framework to computational predictors and introduce a new standard that converts a tool's scores to PP3 and BP4 evidence strengths. Our approach is based on estimating the local positive predictive value and can calibrate any computational tool or other continuous-scale evidence on any variant type. We estimate thresholds (score intervals) corresponding to each strength of evidence for pathogenicity and benignity for thirteen missense variant interpretation tools, using carefully assembled independent data sets. Most tools achieved supporting evidence level for both pathogenic and benign classification using newly established thresholds. Multiple tools reached score thresholds justifying moderate and several reached strong evidence levels. One tool reached very strong evidence level for benign classification on some variants. Based on these findings, we provide recommendations for evidence-based revisions of the PP3 and BP4 ACMG/AMP criteria using individual tools and future assessment of computational methods for clinical interpretation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36413997
pii: S0002-9297(22)00461-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.10.013
pmc: PMC9748256
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2163-2177Subventions
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : R13 HG006650
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : U24 HG009649
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HG012022
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : U24 HG006834
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : U24 HG007346
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA121245
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : U24 HG011450
Pays : United States
Organisme : NLM NIH HHS
ID : R00 LM012992
Pays : United States
Organisme : NLM NIH HHS
ID : K99 LM012992
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HG011755
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U24 CA258119
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : U41 HG009649
Pays : United States
Organisme : Intramural NIH HHS
ID : ZIA HG200359
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA264971
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : UM1 HG008900
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : U24 HG009650
Pays : United States
Investigateurs
Leslie G Biesecker
(LG)
Steven M Harrison
(SM)
Ahmad A Tayoun
(AA)
Jonathan S Berg
(JS)
Steven E Brenner
(SE)
Garry R Cutting
(GR)
Sian Ellard
(S)
Marc S Greenblatt
(MS)
Peter Kang
(P)
Izabela Karbassi
(I)
Rachel Karchin
(R)
Jessica Mester
(J)
Anne O'Donnell-Luria
(A)
Tina Pesaran
(T)
Sharon E Plon
(SE)
Heidi L Rehm
(HL)
Natasha T Strande
(NT)
Sean V Tavtigian
(SV)
Scott Topper
(S)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests The PERCH software, for which B.-J.F. is the inventor, has been non-exclusively licensed to Ambry Genetics Corporation for their clinical genetic testing services and research. B.-J.F. also reports funding and sponsorship to his institution on his behalf from Pfizer Inc., Regeneron Genetics Center LLC., and Astra Zeneca. A.O’D.-L. is a compensated member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Congenica. L.G.B. is an uncompensated member of the Illumina Medical Ethics committee and receives honoraria from Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. V.P., B.-J.F., K.A.P., S.D.M., R.K., A.O’D.-L., and P.R. participated in the development of some of the tools assessed in this study. While every care was taken to mitigate any potential biases in this work, these authors’ participation in method development is noted.
Références
Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):434-443
pubmed: 32461654
Nat Genet. 2018 Aug;50(8):1161-1170
pubmed: 30038395
Genome Med. 2019 Dec 31;12(1):3
pubmed: 31892348
Nat Methods. 2010 Apr;7(4):248-9
pubmed: 20354512
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020 Sep;8(9):e1206
pubmed: 32160417
J Med Genet. 2021 Aug;58(8):547-555
pubmed: 32843488
Genome Biol. 2017 Nov 28;18(1):225
pubmed: 29179779
BMC Genomics. 2013;14 Suppl 3:S3
pubmed: 23819870
Hum Mutat. 2015 May;36(5):513-23
pubmed: 25684150
J Mol Biol. 2013 Nov 1;425(21):4047-63
pubmed: 23962656
Hum Mutat. 2013 Jan;34(1):57-65
pubmed: 23033316
PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Dec 02;6(12):e1001025
pubmed: 21152010
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 4;9(1):12752
pubmed: 31484976
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 20;11(1):5918
pubmed: 33219223
Genet Med. 2018 Sep;20(9):1054-1060
pubmed: 29300386
Genet Epidemiol. 2002 Jun;23(1):70-86
pubmed: 12112249
Genome Med. 2020 Dec 2;12(1):103
pubmed: 33261662
Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24
pubmed: 25741868
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1202-1214
pubmed: 31283070
Genome Res. 2014 Dec;24(12):2050-8
pubmed: 25217195
Hum Mutat. 2017 Mar;38(3):243-251
pubmed: 27995669
Genome Res. 2001 May;11(5):863-74
pubmed: 11337480
Genet Med. 2017 Oct;19(10):1096-1104
pubmed: 28301460
Nat Methods. 2014 Apr;11(4):361-2
pubmed: 24681721
Nat Genet. 2014 Mar;46(3):310-5
pubmed: 24487276
J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Nov;56(11):1129-35
pubmed: 14615004
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Oct 6;99(4):877-885
pubmed: 27666373
Bioinformatics. 2009 Nov 1;25(21):2744-50
pubmed: 19734154
Hum Mutat. 2020 Oct;41(10):1734-1737
pubmed: 32720330
Am J Hum Genet. 2021 Apr 1;108(4):535-548
pubmed: 33798442
Bioinformatics. 2021 Jan 25;:
pubmed: 33492342
Genet Med. 2021 Jul;23(7):1288-1295
pubmed: 33767344
Genome Res. 2010 Jan;20(1):110-21
pubmed: 19858363
Genet Med. 2021 Nov;23(11):2096-2104
pubmed: 34230640
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D1062-D1067
pubmed: 29165669