An implementation of the learning curve cumulative summation test to evaluate a practicum for endometrial cancer ultrasound staging.
CUSUM
Endometrial cancer
LC-CUSUM
Learning curve cumulative summation test
Staging
Ultrasound
Journal
Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea)
ISSN: 2288-5919
Titre abrégé: Ultrasonography
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101626019
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
09
05
2022
accepted:
19
08
2022
pubmed:
23
11
2022
medline:
23
11
2022
entrez:
22
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The learning curve cumulative summation (LC-CUSUM) test is commonly used as a quantitative assessment of the individual learning process. This study aimed to evaluate the skill acquisition process for performing ultrasound staging of endometrial cancer using the LC-CUSUM test. Sixty-seven ultrasound examinations performed by two operators were evaluated using the LC-CUSUM test according to their rate of success or failure to correctly stage myometrial invasion, serosa involvement, and pelvic and para-aortic lymph node involvement. The reference standard was the pathologic result. After the learning phase, the cumulative summation (CUSUM) test was applied to assess performance maintenance. The processes achieved satisfactory performance in the majority of the cases according to the established definitions. Operator 1 reached adequate performance within the 30th procedure for all the locations considered, while operator 2 performed fewer than 30 ultrasound examinations by the audit time. The CUSUM test confirmed that the target quality was preserved after the learning phase. Moreover, the ultrasound staging for endometrial cancer was highly accurate. Using the LC-CUSUM test made it possible to monitor the achievement and maintenance of a satisfactory performance quantitatively. The LC-CUSUM test could be a valuable instrument to survey diagnostic pathways in gynecological ultrasonography quantitatively.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36414247
pii: usg.22078
doi: 10.14366/usg.22078
pmc: PMC9816701
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
147-153Références
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;54(2):262-269
pubmed: 30426587
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Feb;128(2):300-8
pubmed: 23200916
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jan 1;2(1):35-9
pubmed: 12797004
Stat Med. 2010 Aug 15;29(18):1900-9
pubmed: 20680983
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jul;56(1):96-105
pubmed: 31647145
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep;42(3):353-8
pubmed: 23640790
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;31(5):560-6
pubmed: 18398926
Emerg Med J. 2015 Apr;32(4):291-4
pubmed: 24154942
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;42(2):218-23
pubmed: 23420783
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jan;55(1):115-124
pubmed: 31225683
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;56(3):443-452
pubmed: 31840873
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Jul;28(5):721-39
pubmed: 24852891
Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Oct;12(5):433-8
pubmed: 11079224
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;45(4):476-82
pubmed: 25092412
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 18;10(14):
pubmed: 34300331
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Apr;30(3):302-7
pubmed: 20373937
Ann Oncol. 2016 Jan;27(1):16-41
pubmed: 26634381
Br J Surg. 2008 Jul;95(7):925-9
pubmed: 18498126
J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Dec;35(12):2589-2594
pubmed: 27872415
Lancet. 2022 Apr 9;399(10333):1412-1428
pubmed: 35397864
Curr Oncol Rep. 2015 Jun;17(6):28
pubmed: 25980344
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;38(3):246-66
pubmed: 21898632
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Nov;28(6):e86
pubmed: 29027404
Pathol Oncol Res. 2020 Oct;26(4):2265-2272
pubmed: 32451988