The effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving preconception and antenatal preventive care: a systematic review.
Antenatal
Guidelines
Implementation
Meta-analyses
Modifiable risk factors
Preconception
Systematic review
Journal
Implementation science communications
ISSN: 2662-2211
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101764360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Nov 2022
22 Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
08
09
2022
accepted:
03
11
2022
entrez:
24
11
2022
pubmed:
25
11
2022
medline:
25
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Clinical guideline recommendations for addressing modifiable risk factors are not routinely implemented into preconception and antenatal care. This review assessed the effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving health professional provision of preconception and antenatal care addressing tobacco smoking, weight management and alcohol consumption. A systematic review of randomised and non-randomised studies with a parallel comparison group was conducted. Eligible studies used implementation strategy/ies targeted at health professionals to improve at least one element of preconception and/or antenatal care (smoking: ask, advise, assess, assist, arrange; weight/alcohol: assess, advise, refer) compared to usual practice/control or alternative strategies. Eligible studies were identified via CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Maternity and Infant Care, CINAHL and other sources. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted where appropriate, with other findings summarised using the direction of effect. The certainty of the pooled evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Fourteen studies were included in the review. Thirteen were in the antenatal period and 12 tested multiple implementation strategies (median: three). Meta-analyses of RCTs found that implementation strategies compared to usual practice/control probably increase asking (OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.13, 5.59; 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) and advising (OR: 4.32; 95% CI: 3.06, 6.11; 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) about smoking and assessing weight gain (OR: 57.56; 95% CI: 41.78, 79.29; 2 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), and may increase assessing (OR: 2.55; 95% CI: 0.24, 27.06; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence), assisting (OR: 6.34; 95% CI: 1.51, 26.63; 3 studies; low-certainty evidence) and arranging support (OR: 3.55; 95% CI: 0.50, 25.34; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence) for smoking. The true effect of implementation strategies in increasing advice about weight gain (OR: 3.37; 95% CI: 2.34, 4.84; 2 non-randomised studies; very low-certainty evidence) and alcohol consumption (OR: 10.36; 95% CI: 2.37, 41.20; 2 non-randomised studies; very low-certainty evidence) is uncertain due to the quality of evidence to date. Review findings provide some evidence to support the effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving health professional delivery of antenatal care addressing smoking and weight management. Rigorous research is needed to build certainty in the evidence for improving alcohol and weight gain advice, and in preconception care. PROSPERO-CRD42019131691.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Clinical guideline recommendations for addressing modifiable risk factors are not routinely implemented into preconception and antenatal care. This review assessed the effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving health professional provision of preconception and antenatal care addressing tobacco smoking, weight management and alcohol consumption.
METHODS
METHODS
A systematic review of randomised and non-randomised studies with a parallel comparison group was conducted. Eligible studies used implementation strategy/ies targeted at health professionals to improve at least one element of preconception and/or antenatal care (smoking: ask, advise, assess, assist, arrange; weight/alcohol: assess, advise, refer) compared to usual practice/control or alternative strategies. Eligible studies were identified via CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Maternity and Infant Care, CINAHL and other sources. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted where appropriate, with other findings summarised using the direction of effect. The certainty of the pooled evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Fourteen studies were included in the review. Thirteen were in the antenatal period and 12 tested multiple implementation strategies (median: three). Meta-analyses of RCTs found that implementation strategies compared to usual practice/control probably increase asking (OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.13, 5.59; 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) and advising (OR: 4.32; 95% CI: 3.06, 6.11; 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) about smoking and assessing weight gain (OR: 57.56; 95% CI: 41.78, 79.29; 2 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), and may increase assessing (OR: 2.55; 95% CI: 0.24, 27.06; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence), assisting (OR: 6.34; 95% CI: 1.51, 26.63; 3 studies; low-certainty evidence) and arranging support (OR: 3.55; 95% CI: 0.50, 25.34; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence) for smoking. The true effect of implementation strategies in increasing advice about weight gain (OR: 3.37; 95% CI: 2.34, 4.84; 2 non-randomised studies; very low-certainty evidence) and alcohol consumption (OR: 10.36; 95% CI: 2.37, 41.20; 2 non-randomised studies; very low-certainty evidence) is uncertain due to the quality of evidence to date.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Review findings provide some evidence to support the effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving health professional delivery of antenatal care addressing smoking and weight management. Rigorous research is needed to build certainty in the evidence for improving alcohol and weight gain advice, and in preconception care.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
PROSPERO-CRD42019131691.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36419177
doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00368-1
pii: 10.1186/s43058-022-00368-1
pmc: PMC9682815
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
121Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 15;(6):CD007145
pubmed: 26068707
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 May;18(5):1083-1092
pubmed: 26660265
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 04;10:CD011779
pubmed: 27699761
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 May 01;19(5):636-641
pubmed: 28403469
Tob Control. 2006 Apr;15(2):97-102
pubmed: 16565456
BJOG. 2016 Jan;123(2):254-61
pubmed: 26840637
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;108(5):1234-45
pubmed: 17077251
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003030
pubmed: 19370580
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Jan;32(1):1-10
pubmed: 17218187
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 29;(4):CD005470
pubmed: 25923419
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 07;(4):CD007536
pubmed: 19821424
BMJ. 2021 Jan 18;372:m3721
pubmed: 33461967
Implement Sci. 2009 Jul 03;4:37
pubmed: 19575790
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD000409
pubmed: 17943742
Proc Nutr Soc. 2011 Nov;70(4):439-49
pubmed: 21854697
Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 23;8(1):285
pubmed: 31759397
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 7;20(1):280
pubmed: 32381056
Health Educ Res. 2011 Apr;26(2):348-60
pubmed: 21398375
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 24;6:CD000125
pubmed: 31232458
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 4;9(6):e025293
pubmed: 31167863
Eur J Orthod. 2015 Oct;37(5):457-61
pubmed: 26136438
Implement Sci. 2022 Jan 28;17(1):11
pubmed: 35090508
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2005 Dec;29(6):558-64
pubmed: 16366068
Healthcare (Basel). 2016 Jun 29;4(3):
pubmed: 27417624
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Mar;5(3):e290-e299
pubmed: 28089487
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Nov 1;35(Supplement_1):i65-i75
pubmed: 33165586
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Jul;49(7):595-9
pubmed: 26310470
Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Aug 4;116(2):460-469
pubmed: 35441212
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(4):515-523
pubmed: 20196678
Med Care. 2006 Jun;44(6):542-51
pubmed: 16708003
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Oct;21(10):1927-1938
pubmed: 28707103
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 14;11:CD012439
pubmed: 30480770
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 May;166(5):1356-63
pubmed: 1595791
Am J Prev Med. 2004 Aug;27(2 Suppl):88-101
pubmed: 15275677
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Apr;167(2):149-53
pubmed: 23266206
Addiction. 2021 Jul;116(7):1638-1663
pubmed: 33067887
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Dec;52(6):545-51
pubmed: 23113826
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 14;2:CD001055
pubmed: 28196405
PLoS Med. 2021 Mar 29;18(3):e1003583
pubmed: 33780438
Addiction. 2001 Mar;96(3):485-94
pubmed: 11255587
Nutrients. 2018 Jul 22;10(7):
pubmed: 30037126
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10:ED000142
pubmed: 31643080
NCHS Data Brief. 2018 Feb;(305):1-8
pubmed: 29528282
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Apr;29(3):181-7
pubmed: 19358020
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011 Jul;72(4):530-5
pubmed: 21683034
Alcohol Alcohol. 2015 Nov;50(6):708-15
pubmed: 26018219
Public Health. 2013 Nov;127(11):1034-7
pubmed: 24035564
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Jun;59(3):356-361
pubmed: 30014485
Aust J Prim Health. 2011;17(2):135-41
pubmed: 21645468
Vaccine. 2010 Jul 12;28(31):5086-92
pubmed: 20580740
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 08;(3):CD001096
pubmed: 19588323
Addict Behav. 2019 Jun;93:29-38
pubmed: 30684819
BMJ. 1990 Nov 17;301(6761):1111
pubmed: 2252919
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;(3):CD002213
pubmed: 23543515
Pediatrics. 2011 Mar;127(3):e647-53
pubmed: 21357347
Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Jan;49(1):35-43
pubmed: 12527151
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jul 20;16(1):175
pubmed: 27439974
Implement Sci. 2014 Aug 05;9:97
pubmed: 25091032
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Sep 06;11:62
pubmed: 21892967
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 Aug;43(8):1606-1616
pubmed: 31194258
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 24;9(7):e103085
pubmed: 25058333
Addict Behav. 2015 Nov;50:102-9
pubmed: 26117214
Implement Sci. 2015 Feb 12;10:21
pubmed: 25889199
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD000259
pubmed: 22696318
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Apr;50(4):475-86
pubmed: 23036149
BMJ. 2020 Jan 16;368:l6890
pubmed: 31948937
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2):158-76
pubmed: 18617085