Testicular Cancer Knowledge and Viewpoints of American Men.
early detection of cancer
self-examination
testicular neoplasms
Journal
Urology practice
ISSN: 2352-0779
Titre abrégé: Urol Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101635343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
25
05
2021
accepted:
28
07
2021
entrez:
24
11
2022
pubmed:
25
11
2022
medline:
25
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We sought to better understand the baseline knowledge and practices of the general population regarding testicular cancer (TC) and testicular self-examination (TSE) in an effort to understand whether current screening guidelines reflect their viewpoint. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) currently recommends against TSE for TC screening due to a lack of data to support a benefit. Early detection of TC may reduce the required burden of therapy and associated long-term toxicities. This was a cross-sectional survey study. Participants (median age 33 years, IQR 28-39) were recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk, a validated crowdsourcing platform used to recruit minimally compensated participants. A total of 250 men rated themselves as "somewhat unknowledgeable" about TC, with no respondents considering themselves "very knowledgeable." Only 26.4% of men knew that TC was curable most of the time. Despite 90.8% of men feeling that their doctor had some role in discussing TC/TSE, only 17.2% had discussed these topics with their doctor. Even after being informed of the rationale behind USPSTF recommendations, only 8% of men thought that potential false positives of TSE would be more important than the rare chance of finding early TC. American men do not feel knowledgeable about TC, have a favorable attitude toward TSE and want their doctor to discuss these topics. Shared decision making regarding TC screening is warranted given the low risk of harm and patient interest, and continued accrual of data on this topic is necessary given the lack of prospective work to date.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36419456
doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000267
pii: UP-21-102
pmc: PMC9661737
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
72-79Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Urology. 2010 Oct;76(4):915-8
pubmed: 20471670
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 4;18(1):21
pubmed: 29301513
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Apr;33(4):533-538
pubmed: 29302882
Am J Mens Health. 2017 Mar;11(2):253-261
pubmed: 27645516
Am J Mens Health. 2013 May;7(3):243-54
pubmed: 23283809
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. ;17(11):4999-5003
pubmed: 28032730
Cancer Med. 2014 Dec;3(6):1629-34
pubmed: 25103095
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Aug 23;293(6545):480-1
pubmed: 3091167
Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Mar;64(4):475-87
pubmed: 20456194
J Am Coll Health. 2017 Nov-Dec;65(8):579-584
pubmed: 28715243
J Fam Pract. 2000 Feb;49(2):147-52
pubmed: 10718692
Am J Mens Health. 2018 May;12(3):531-538
pubmed: 26483292
Urol Oncol. 2013 Apr;31(3):386-91
pubmed: 21429771
Am Psychol. 2003 Jan;58(1):5-14
pubmed: 12674814
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 26;10(1):20684
pubmed: 33244121
Am J Mens Health. 2009 Jun;3(2):134-40
pubmed: 19477726
J Adolesc Health Care. 1988 Nov;9(6):474-9
pubmed: 3182361
Br J Health Psychol. 2004 Nov;9(Pt 4):479-87
pubmed: 15509356
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Apr 5;154(7):483-6
pubmed: 21464350
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Apr;33(2):398-403
pubmed: 27815814