Drug-based therapy for advanced adenoid cystic carcinoma: Current landscape and challenges based on an overview of registered clinical trials.
Chemotherapy
Head and neck cancer
Oncology
Salivary gland cancer
Journal
Critical reviews in oncology/hematology
ISSN: 1879-0461
Titre abrégé: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8916049
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
16
08
2022
revised:
01
11
2022
accepted:
21
11
2022
pubmed:
26
11
2022
medline:
4
1
2023
entrez:
25
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) has a significant patient-population in need of effective systemic therapy, as no drug is currently approved by the FDA for its management. We critically reviewed ACC-clinical trials (CT) registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov website using "ACC" under condition or disease. Trials specifically designed to test a drug-based therapy for ACC (n = 33) were analyzed with most being one-arm phase II trials enrolling advanced, recurrent/metastatic, incurable ACC cases. Site restriction, maximum ECOG status, and period of disease progression varied as inclusion criteria. Small-molecule inhibitors were those most commonly investigated with Apatinib, Axitinib and Lenvatinib showing the best results in association with rigid enrollment criteria. The overall median time to progression remains modest and more efforts are urgently needed in this field. CTs designed to test drugs that act on key pathways associated with ACC aggressiveness are being conducted and represent a promising pathway if efficacy is proved.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36427771
pii: S1040-8428(22)00310-9
doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103886
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Axitinib
C9LVQ0YUXG
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
103886Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest The authors declare no competing interests. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the paper.