Evaluation of the Performance of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay for the Detection of Anti-MDA5 Antibodies.
MDA5
autoantibody
biomarker
dermatomyositis
diagnosis
follow-up
idiopathic inflammatory myopathies
immunomonitoring
indirect immunofluorescence
myositis
Journal
Biomedicines
ISSN: 2227-9059
Titre abrégé: Biomedicines
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101691304
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Nov 2022
18 Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
03
10
2022
revised:
27
10
2022
accepted:
17
11
2022
entrez:
26
11
2022
pubmed:
27
11
2022
medline:
27
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5) antibody (Ab) positive dermatomyositis (anti-MDA5 DM) is a rare systemic autoimmune disease; further, its prognosis can be rapidly fatal due to pulmonary involvement. The identification and quantification of anti-MDA5 Abs, which serve as a highly specific biomarker of the disease, is a critical step for the establishing of both the diagnosis and monitoring of the disease's activity. The development of a simple, fast, low-cost, and specific detection system of anti-MDA5 Ab is therefore highly desirable for the purposes of routine laboratory diagnosis. Here, we developed a human cell line that stably expresses MDA5 and evaluated its analytical performance in order to detect anti-MDA5 Abs by the utilization of indirect immunofluorescence (IIF). Serum samples from 23 anti-MDA5 DM patients and 22 anti-MDA5 Abs negative myositis readings, which were obtained at time of diagnosis, were analyzed by IIF on MDA5-transfected cells. The results were compared with those obtained with specific semi-quantitative (immunodot) and quantitative (ELISA) assays. A specific cytoplasmic pattern was found solely with the sera of anti-MDA5 DM patients. The sensitivity and specificity of IIF on MDA5-transfected cells were 96% and 100%, respectively, compared with ELISA. The anti-MDA5 Abs titers that were determined by this approach were consistent with the quantitative results obtained by ELISA. Baseline concentrations of anti-MDA5 Abs, either by ELISA or IIF, were not significantly different between surviving and deceased patients; further, they did not differ significantly according to clinical phenotypes. Overall, an IIF cell-based assay constitutes a simple, fast, and low-cost approach to identify and quantify anti-MDA5 Abs; moreover, it is as efficient as ELISA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36428536
pii: biomedicines10112969
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10112969
pmc: PMC9687661
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Hospices Civils de Lyon
ID : 69HCL18- 0527
Organisme : Fondation Arthritis
ID : anti-MDA5 IR
Références
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Jul;60(7):2193-200
pubmed: 19565506
Curr Treatm Opt Rheumatol. 2021;7(4):319-333
pubmed: 34603940
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Oct;64(10):1602-10
pubmed: 22623119
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Feb;176(2):395-402
pubmed: 27452897
Front Immunol. 2021 Oct 20;12:773352
pubmed: 34745149
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Dec 24;61(1):430-439
pubmed: 33742662
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 26;11(4):e0154285
pubmed: 27115353
J Immunol Res. 2014;2014:290797
pubmed: 24741583
Curr Opin Neurol. 2016 Oct;29(5):662-73
pubmed: 27538058
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Aug 1;59(8):2109-2114
pubmed: 32030410
Scand J Rheumatol. 2017 Nov;46(6):509-511
pubmed: 28795873
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002 Apr;46(4):626-36
pubmed: 11907524
Front Immunol. 2019 Apr 30;10:848
pubmed: 31114570
Neurology. 2020 Jul 7;95(1):e70-e78
pubmed: 32487712
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 May;52(5):1571-6
pubmed: 15880816
Br J Dermatol. 2019 May;180(5):1090-1098
pubmed: 29947075
Mod Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;29(5):814-820
pubmed: 30449228
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 May;51(5):800-4
pubmed: 22210662
Respir Investig. 2018 Nov;56(6):464-472
pubmed: 30150008
Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Jul 02;16(4):R138
pubmed: 24989778
Neuromuscul Disord. 2004 May;14(5):337-45
pubmed: 15099594
J Autoimmun. 2022 Jun;130:102831
pubmed: 35436746
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Sep 1;56(9):1492-1497
pubmed: 28499006
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Jan 30;16(1):58
pubmed: 33516242
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Oct 14;22(20):
pubmed: 34681752
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015 May;54(5):784-91
pubmed: 25288783
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014 Nov-Dec;32(6):891-7
pubmed: 25151986
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Jul;51(7):1278-84
pubmed: 22378718