Evaluation of the Performance of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay for the Detection of Anti-MDA5 Antibodies.

MDA5 autoantibody biomarker dermatomyositis diagnosis follow-up idiopathic inflammatory myopathies immunomonitoring indirect immunofluorescence myositis

Journal

Biomedicines
ISSN: 2227-9059
Titre abrégé: Biomedicines
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101691304

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Nov 2022
Historique:
received: 03 10 2022
revised: 27 10 2022
accepted: 17 11 2022
entrez: 26 11 2022
pubmed: 27 11 2022
medline: 27 11 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5) antibody (Ab) positive dermatomyositis (anti-MDA5 DM) is a rare systemic autoimmune disease; further, its prognosis can be rapidly fatal due to pulmonary involvement. The identification and quantification of anti-MDA5 Abs, which serve as a highly specific biomarker of the disease, is a critical step for the establishing of both the diagnosis and monitoring of the disease's activity. The development of a simple, fast, low-cost, and specific detection system of anti-MDA5 Ab is therefore highly desirable for the purposes of routine laboratory diagnosis. Here, we developed a human cell line that stably expresses MDA5 and evaluated its analytical performance in order to detect anti-MDA5 Abs by the utilization of indirect immunofluorescence (IIF). Serum samples from 23 anti-MDA5 DM patients and 22 anti-MDA5 Abs negative myositis readings, which were obtained at time of diagnosis, were analyzed by IIF on MDA5-transfected cells. The results were compared with those obtained with specific semi-quantitative (immunodot) and quantitative (ELISA) assays. A specific cytoplasmic pattern was found solely with the sera of anti-MDA5 DM patients. The sensitivity and specificity of IIF on MDA5-transfected cells were 96% and 100%, respectively, compared with ELISA. The anti-MDA5 Abs titers that were determined by this approach were consistent with the quantitative results obtained by ELISA. Baseline concentrations of anti-MDA5 Abs, either by ELISA or IIF, were not significantly different between surviving and deceased patients; further, they did not differ significantly according to clinical phenotypes. Overall, an IIF cell-based assay constitutes a simple, fast, and low-cost approach to identify and quantify anti-MDA5 Abs; moreover, it is as efficient as ELISA.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36428536
pii: biomedicines10112969
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10112969
pmc: PMC9687661
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Hospices Civils de Lyon
ID : 69HCL18- 0527
Organisme : Fondation Arthritis
ID : anti-MDA5 IR

Références

Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Jul;60(7):2193-200
pubmed: 19565506
Curr Treatm Opt Rheumatol. 2021;7(4):319-333
pubmed: 34603940
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Oct;64(10):1602-10
pubmed: 22623119
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Feb;176(2):395-402
pubmed: 27452897
Front Immunol. 2021 Oct 20;12:773352
pubmed: 34745149
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Dec 24;61(1):430-439
pubmed: 33742662
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 26;11(4):e0154285
pubmed: 27115353
J Immunol Res. 2014;2014:290797
pubmed: 24741583
Curr Opin Neurol. 2016 Oct;29(5):662-73
pubmed: 27538058
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Aug 1;59(8):2109-2114
pubmed: 32030410
Scand J Rheumatol. 2017 Nov;46(6):509-511
pubmed: 28795873
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002 Apr;46(4):626-36
pubmed: 11907524
Front Immunol. 2019 Apr 30;10:848
pubmed: 31114570
Neurology. 2020 Jul 7;95(1):e70-e78
pubmed: 32487712
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 May;52(5):1571-6
pubmed: 15880816
Br J Dermatol. 2019 May;180(5):1090-1098
pubmed: 29947075
Mod Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;29(5):814-820
pubmed: 30449228
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 May;51(5):800-4
pubmed: 22210662
Respir Investig. 2018 Nov;56(6):464-472
pubmed: 30150008
Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Jul 02;16(4):R138
pubmed: 24989778
Neuromuscul Disord. 2004 May;14(5):337-45
pubmed: 15099594
J Autoimmun. 2022 Jun;130:102831
pubmed: 35436746
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Sep 1;56(9):1492-1497
pubmed: 28499006
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Jan 30;16(1):58
pubmed: 33516242
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Oct 14;22(20):
pubmed: 34681752
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015 May;54(5):784-91
pubmed: 25288783
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014 Nov-Dec;32(6):891-7
pubmed: 25151986
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Jul;51(7):1278-84
pubmed: 22378718

Auteurs

Anaïs Nombel (A)

Immunology Department, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France.

Jean-Jacques Pin (JJ)

Eurobio Scientific Dendritics-Edouard Herriot Hospital, 69003 Lyon, France.

Nicole Fabien (N)

Immunology Department, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France.

Pierre Miossec (P)

Immunogenomics and Inflammation Research Team, University of Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, 69003 Lyon, France.
Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, 69003 Lyon, France.

Frédéric Coutant (F)

Immunology Department, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France.
Immunogenomics and Inflammation Research Team, University of Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, 69003 Lyon, France.

Classifications MeSH