PET/CT with
18F-FDG
18F-choline
90Y-microspheres
hepatocellular carcinoma
molecular imaging
positron emission tomography
Journal
Biomedicines
ISSN: 2227-9059
Titre abrégé: Biomedicines
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101691304
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Nov 2022
21 Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
28
10
2022
revised:
14
11
2022
accepted:
18
11
2022
entrez:
26
11
2022
pubmed:
27
11
2022
medline:
27
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Our aim was to assess the role of positron emission computed tomography (PET/CT) with 18F-choline (18F-FCH) or 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) submitted to 90Y-radioembolization (90Y-TARE). We retrospectively analyzed clinical records of 21 HCC patients submitted to PET/CT with 18F-fluorocholine (18F-FCH) or 18F-fluodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) before and 8 weeks after 90Y-TARE. On pre-treatment PET/CT, 13 subjects (61.9%) were 18F-FCH-positive, while 8 (38.1%) resulted 18F-FCH-negative and 18F-FDG-positive. At 8-weeks post 90Y-TARE PET/CT, 13 subjects showed partial metabolic response and 8 resulted non-responders, with a higher response rate among 18F-FCH-positive with respect to 18F-FDG-positive patients (i.e., 76.9% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.46). Post-treatment PET/CT influenced patients’ clinical management in 10 cases (47.6%); in 8 subjects it provided indication for a second 90Y-TARE targeting metabolically active HCC remnant, while in 2 patients it led to a PET-guided radiotherapy on metastatic nodes. By Kaplan−Meier analysis, patients’ age (≤69 y) and post 90Y-TARE PET/CT’s impact on clinical management significantly correlated with overall survival (OS). In Cox multivariate analysis, PET/CT’s impact on clinical management remained the only predictor of patients’ OS (p < 0.001). In our real-world study, PET/CT with 18F-FCH or 18F-FDG influenced clinical management and affected the final outcome for HCC patients treated with 90Y-TARE.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36428565
pii: biomedicines10112996
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10112996
pmc: PMC9687226
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Future Oncol. 2018 Apr;14(9):809-818
pubmed: 29251517
Korean J Radiol. 2018 Mar-Apr;19(2):209-222
pubmed: 29520178
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019 May;16(5):341-350
pubmed: 30990129
Oncotarget. 2016 Nov 1;7(44):72343-72355
pubmed: 27579537
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 07;9:924824
pubmed: 35872754
Radiology. 2018 Sep;288(3):764-773
pubmed: 29786487
Br J Radiol. 2021 Mar 01;94(1119):20200752
pubmed: 33411569
EJNMMI Res. 2017 Nov 28;7(1):94
pubmed: 29185067
J Hepatol. 2018 Jul;69(1):182-236
pubmed: 29628281
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):401-7
pubmed: 20950954
Nucl Med Commun. 2018 Sep;39(9):845-852
pubmed: 29901488
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Aug;18(8):525-543
pubmed: 33850328
J Hepatol. 2013 Oct;59(4):753-61
pubmed: 23707371
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Feb;42(2):328-54
pubmed: 25452219
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 10;14(14):
pubmed: 35884412
J Nucl Med. 2015 Nov;56(11):1661-6
pubmed: 26405170
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Feb;218(2):359-369
pubmed: 34494448
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004 Dec;31(12):1621-30
pubmed: 15278306
J Hepatol. 2018 Aug;69(2):336-344
pubmed: 29518452
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2014 Nov 03;1:163-82
pubmed: 27508185
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Nov;45(11):1608-1621
pubmed: 35982334
Nucl Med Commun. 2021 Jun 1;42(6):633-638
pubmed: 33660694
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 11;11:752725
pubmed: 34707994
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Feb;52(1):1-4
pubmed: 29391906
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Nov;45(12):2110-2121
pubmed: 29948107
Adv Ther. 2018 Nov;35(11):1763-1774
pubmed: 30357570
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Jan;44(1):21-35
pubmed: 32959085
Hepatol Int. 2014 Oct;8(4):493-500
pubmed: 26202754
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 24;11(1):4472
pubmed: 33627727