Response to First-Line Treatment with Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Retrospective Analysis from the German ADOReg Registry.
advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
cemiplimab
checkpoint inhibitor therapy
immunosuppression
real-world data
response durability
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Nov 2022
11 Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
26
10
2022
revised:
08
11
2022
accepted:
09
11
2022
entrez:
26
11
2022
pubmed:
27
11
2022
medline:
27
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a common malignancy of the skin and has an overall favorable outcome, except for patients with an advanced stage of the disease. The efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) for advanced cSCC has been demonstrated in recent clinical studies, but data from real-world cohorts and trial-ineligible cSCC patients are limited. We retrospectively investigated patients with advanced cSCC who have been treated with CPI in a first-line setting at eight German skin cancer centers registered within the multicenter registry ADOReg. Clinical outcome parameters including response, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), time-to-next-treatment (TTNT), and toxicity were analyzed and have been stratified by the individual immune status. Among 39 evaluable patients, the tumor response rate (rwTRR) was 48.6%, the median PFS was 29.0 months, and the median OS was not reached. In addition, 9 patients showed an impaired immune status due to immunosuppressive medication or hematological diseases. Our data demonstrated that CPI also evoked tumor responses among immunocompromised patients (rwTRR: 48.1 vs. 50.0%), although these responses less often resulted in durable remissions. In line with this, the median PFS (11 vs. 40 months, p = 0.059), TTNT (12 months vs. NR, p = 0.016), and OS (29 months vs. NR, p < 0.001) were significantly shorter for this patient cohort. CPI therapy was well tolerated in both subcohorts with 15% discontinuing therapy due to toxicity. Our real-world data show that first-line CPI therapy produced strong and durable responses among patients with advanced cSCC. Immunocompromised patients were less likely to achieve long-term benefit from anti-PD1 treatment, despite similar tumor response rates.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36428636
pii: cancers14225543
doi: 10.3390/cancers14225543
pmc: PMC9688854
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : Project number: HA 9793/1-1
Organisme : University Medical Center Mainz
ID : Intramural research funding
Références
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 01;14(7):
pubmed: 35406577
Future Oncol. 2020 Feb;16(4):11-19
pubmed: 31951149
JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Oct;151(10):1081-6
pubmed: 25928283
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Jun;96:34-43
pubmed: 29665511
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 15;13(14):
pubmed: 34298764
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2014 Dec;12(12):1156-7
pubmed: 25482714
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Oct;138:125-132
pubmed: 32882466
Eur J Cancer. 2022 Jul;170:42-53
pubmed: 35594611
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Oct;8(2):
pubmed: 33093156
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Dec;33 Suppl 8:44-51
pubmed: 31658392
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2018 May;67(5):825-834
pubmed: 29487980
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Nov;157:250-258
pubmed: 34536948
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Jun;82(6):1490-1500
pubmed: 31302190
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):294-305
pubmed: 31952975
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Apr;75:24-32
pubmed: 28214654
JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Jan 1;154(1):60-66
pubmed: 29167858
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 10;38(26):3051-3061
pubmed: 32730186
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1480-1492
pubmed: 30361170
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 26;379(4):341-351
pubmed: 29863979
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Jun;147(6):1803-1811
pubmed: 33210210
J Invest Dermatol. 2017 Sep;137(9):1860-1867
pubmed: 28487088
Ann Oncol. 2021 Oct;32(10):1276-1285
pubmed: 34293460