Influence of Metal Implants on Quantitative Evaluation of Bone Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography.
bone
computed tomography-based attenuation correction
metal implant
single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography
standardized uptake value
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Nov 2022
14 Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
09
10
2022
revised:
25
10
2022
accepted:
10
11
2022
entrez:
26
11
2022
pubmed:
27
11
2022
medline:
27
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
When visualizing biological activity at nonunion sites by the radioisotopes, gamma rays are more attenuated if metal implants are placed in the bone. However, the effects of various implant types and their placement on gamma ray attenuation in quantitative evaluation remain unknown. To elucidate these effects, we created a phantom that simulated the nonunion of the femur in this study. The count of gamma rays was measured by single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) while considering CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC), metal implant placement, type (intramedullary nail or plate), and position. The count differed significantly with and without CTAC and with and without implants (both types) under CTAC. Significantly different counts were observed between the intramedullary nail and plate placed contralaterally to the lesion (i.e., non-lesion side). No significant difference was observed between the intramedullary nail and plate on the lesion side or between plates on the non-lesion and lesion sides. The measured standardized uptake value (SUV) was closer to the true SUV with CTAC than without. Moreover, the count was higher with implants than without. However, even with implants, it was lower than the actual count, indicating the absence of overcorrection. Implant type and position do not seem to influence the count.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36431209
pii: jcm11226732
doi: 10.3390/jcm11226732
pmc: PMC9693383
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : National Mutual Insurance Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives (ZENKYOREN)
ID : non
Références
Nucl Med Commun. 2013 Oct;34(10):964-70
pubmed: 23820764
Orthopedics. 2014 Jan;37(1):e44-50
pubmed: 24683656
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016 Aug;50(4):393-9
pubmed: 27449592
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2015 Dec;71(12):1235-40
pubmed: 26685836
SICOT J. 2022;8:19
pubmed: 35608412
Injury. 2001 Jan;32(1):61-5
pubmed: 11164405
J Nucl Med Technol. 2013 Sep;41(3):203-7
pubmed: 23918615
Malays Orthop J. 2019 Jul;13(2):1-10
pubmed: 31467644
Nucl Med Commun. 2011 Apr;32(4):289-97
pubmed: 21224745
Br J Radiol. 2020 Oct 01;93(1114):20200300
pubmed: 32663034
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Feb 10;16(1):125
pubmed: 33568159
Injury. 2017 Jun;48(6):1194-1203
pubmed: 28377261
J Orthop Sci. 2013 Jan;18(1):76-80
pubmed: 23053587
Front Surg. 2019 Jun 18;6:35
pubmed: 31275942
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Dec;142(12):3605-3611
pubmed: 34003368
Injury. 2021 Jun;52(6):1529-1533
pubmed: 33059926
Eur J Hybrid Imaging. 2018;2(1):4
pubmed: 29782595
Ann Nucl Med. 2010 Dec;24(10):735-43
pubmed: 20976575
Acta Orthop. 2012 Dec;83(6):653-60
pubmed: 23140093
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Mar 25;20(1):127
pubmed: 30909909
Semin Nucl Med. 2018 Sep;48(5):396-409
pubmed: 30193647