ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Osteomyelitis, Septic Arthritis, or Soft Tissue Infection (Excluding Spine and Diabetic Foot): 2022 Update.
AUC
Appropriate Use Criteria
Appropriateness Criteria
Foreign body
Necrotizing fasciitis
Orthopedic hardware
Osteomyelitis
Septic arthritis
Soft tissue infection
Journal
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
ISSN: 1558-349X
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101190326
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
received:
30
08
2022
accepted:
01
09
2022
entrez:
27
11
2022
pubmed:
28
11
2022
medline:
30
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Musculoskeletal infections involve bones, joints, and soft tissues. These infections are a common clinical scenario in both outpatient and emergent settings. Although radiography provides baseline findings, a multimodality approach is often implemented to provide more detailed information on the extent of infection involvement and complications. MRI with intravenous contrast is excellent for the evaluation of musculoskeletal infections and is the most sensitive for diagnosing osteomyelitis. MRI, CT, and ultrasound can be useful for joint and soft tissue infections. When MRI or CT is contraindicated, bone scans and the appropriate utilization of other nuclear medicine scans can be implemented for aiding in the diagnostic imaging of infection, especially with metal hardware and arthroplasty artifacts on MRI and CT. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer-reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer-reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36436971
pii: S1546-1440(22)00647-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.013
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Practice Guideline
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
S473-S487Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.