Regional Differences in Intestinal Contractile Responses to Radial Stretch in the Human Lower Gastrointestinal Tract.
Colon
Enteric nervous system
Gastrointestinal motility
Lower gastrointestinal tract
Peristalsis
Journal
Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility
ISSN: 2093-0879
Titre abrégé: J Neurogastroenterol Motil
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101530189
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Jan 2023
30 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
02
12
2021
revised:
01
07
2022
accepted:
06
08
2022
pubmed:
29
11
2022
medline:
29
11
2022
entrez:
28
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Radial stretch evokes an increase or decrease in contractions in the lower gastrointestinal tract via mechanosensory enteric neurons that project into the muscle layers. We aim to elucidate the differences in stretch reflexes according to their location in the human colon. We used healthy intestinal smooth muscle tissue excised during elective colon cancer surgery. Conventional intracellular recordings from colonic muscle cells and tension recordings of colonic segments were performed. Radial stretch was evoked through balloon catheter inflation. Changes in the membrane potential and frequency, amplitude, and area under the curve of muscle contractions were recorded before and after the radial stretch at proximal and distal segment sites. In intracellular circular muscle recordings, hyperpolarization was noted at the distal site of sigmoid colonic segments after radial stretch, in contrast to depolarization at all other sites. In tension recordings at proximal ascending or sigmoid colonic segment sites, contractile activation was observed with statistically significant increases in the frequency, amplitude, and area under the curve after radial stretch. Distal sites of ascending and sigmoid colonic segments showed increase and decrease in contraction, respectively. Radial stretch in the human colon (in vitro) evokes excitatory activity at both proximal and distal sites of the ascending colon and at the proximal site of the sigmoid colon, whereas it elicits inhibitory activity at the distal site of the sigmoid colon.
Sections du résumé
Background/Aims
UNASSIGNED
Radial stretch evokes an increase or decrease in contractions in the lower gastrointestinal tract via mechanosensory enteric neurons that project into the muscle layers. We aim to elucidate the differences in stretch reflexes according to their location in the human colon.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
We used healthy intestinal smooth muscle tissue excised during elective colon cancer surgery. Conventional intracellular recordings from colonic muscle cells and tension recordings of colonic segments were performed. Radial stretch was evoked through balloon catheter inflation. Changes in the membrane potential and frequency, amplitude, and area under the curve of muscle contractions were recorded before and after the radial stretch at proximal and distal segment sites.
Results
UNASSIGNED
In intracellular circular muscle recordings, hyperpolarization was noted at the distal site of sigmoid colonic segments after radial stretch, in contrast to depolarization at all other sites. In tension recordings at proximal ascending or sigmoid colonic segment sites, contractile activation was observed with statistically significant increases in the frequency, amplitude, and area under the curve after radial stretch. Distal sites of ascending and sigmoid colonic segments showed increase and decrease in contraction, respectively.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Radial stretch in the human colon (in vitro) evokes excitatory activity at both proximal and distal sites of the ascending colon and at the proximal site of the sigmoid colon, whereas it elicits inhibitory activity at the distal site of the sigmoid colon.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36437512
pii: jnm21236
doi: 10.5056/jnm21236
pmc: PMC9837542
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
113-121Références
Gastroenterology. 1998 Dec;115(6):1504-12
pubmed: 9834278
Physiology (Bethesda). 2016 Sep;31(5):316-26
pubmed: 27488743
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2019 Jan 1;316(1):G32-G44
pubmed: 30335474
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010 Sep;25(9):1117-26
pubmed: 20544209
J Physiol. 2001 May 15;533(Pt 1):155-63
pubmed: 11351024
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Jun - Aug;40-41:101635
pubmed: 31594655
Front Neurosci. 2014 Apr 16;8:75
pubmed: 24795551
Br J Pharmacol. 2019 Jan;176(2):212-227
pubmed: 30063800
Physiol Rev. 2014 Jul;94(3):859-907
pubmed: 24987007
Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2015 Nov;19(6):533-42
pubmed: 26557020
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Oct 30;23(4):592-605
pubmed: 28774159
Br J Pharmacol. 2001 Jan;132(2):507-17
pubmed: 11159701
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Apr;19(2):192-203
pubmed: 23667750
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov 28;24(44):4989-5004
pubmed: 30510374
J Physiol. 2015 Mar 1;593(5):1169-81
pubmed: 25641660
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2017 May 1;312(5):G508-G515
pubmed: 28336544
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008 Dec;20(12):1298-305
pubmed: 18662329
Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2014 Oct;18(5):383-90
pubmed: 25352757
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2013 Nov 15;305(10):G749-59
pubmed: 24052530
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009 Jan;296(1):G1-8
pubmed: 18988693
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010 Jun;22(6):e207-17
pubmed: 20059762
Eur J Pharmacol. 1990 Nov 6;190(1-2):239-46
pubmed: 1981752
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;46(7-8):823-30
pubmed: 21561228
Gastroenterology. 2001 Mar;120(4):938-45
pubmed: 11231947
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 1997 Jun;9(2):99-107
pubmed: 9198085
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Oct 1;21(4):560-70
pubmed: 26424041
J Physiol. 2016 Aug 1;594(15):4099-116
pubmed: 26990133
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Oct;26(10):1508-12
pubmed: 25088991