Changes in prenatal testing during the COVID-19 pandemic.
COVID-19
access to care
gestational diabetes
glucose tolerance test
pregnancy
prenatal care
ultrasound
Journal
Frontiers in pediatrics
ISSN: 2296-2360
Titre abrégé: Front Pediatr
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101615492
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
07
10
2022
accepted:
24
10
2022
entrez:
28
11
2022
pubmed:
29
11
2022
medline:
29
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted healthcare delivery, including prenatal care. The study objective was to assess if timing of routine prenatal testing changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Retrospective observational cohort study using claims data from a regional insurer (Highmark) and electronic health record data from two academic health systems (Penn Medicine and Yale New Haven) to compare prenatal testing timing in the pre-pandemic (03/10/2018-12/31/2018 and 03/10/2019-12/31/2019) and early COVID-19 pandemic (03/10/2020-12/31/2020) periods. Primary outcomes were second trimester fetal anatomy ultrasounds and gestational diabetes (GDM) testing. A secondary analysis examined first trimester ultrasounds. The three datasets included 31,474 pregnant patients. Mean gestational age for second trimester anatomy ultrasounds increased from the pre-pandemic to COVID-19 period (Highmark 19.4 vs. 19.6 weeks; Penn: 20.1 vs. 20.4 weeks; Yale: 18.8 vs. 19.2 weeks, all While some prenatal testing happened later in pregnancy during the pandemic, pregnant patients continued to receive appropriately timed testing. Despite disruptions in care delivery, prenatal screening remained a priority for patients and providers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36440341
doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1064039
pmc: PMC9682111
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1064039Informations de copyright
© 2022 Handley, Ledyard, Lundsberg, Passarella, Yang, Son, Mckenney, Greenspan, Dysart, Culhane and Burris.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;223(3):389.e1-389.e10
pubmed: 32425200
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;105(5 Pt 1):983-90
pubmed: 15863534
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 26;18(17):
pubmed: 34501577
Semin Perinatol. 2020 Nov;44(7):151278
pubmed: 32792263
Am J Manag Care. 2013 Apr 01;19(4):e125-32
pubmed: 23725450
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 May;123(5):1070-1082
pubmed: 24785860
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022 Apr;44(4):398-408
pubmed: 35176779
JAMA. 2020 Jun 23;323(24):2468-2469
pubmed: 32442264
South Med J. 2002 Aug;95(8):811-21
pubmed: 12190214
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;131(2):e49-e64
pubmed: 29370047
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 16;352(24):2477-86
pubmed: 15951574
Am J Perinatol. 2020 Jun;37(8):800-808
pubmed: 32396948
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 May 9;51(2):418-428
pubmed: 34957523
Midwifery. 2021 Mar;94:102916
pubmed: 33412360
BMJ. 1997 Aug 2;315(7103):275-8
pubmed: 9274545
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e223058
pubmed: 35302626
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr;224(4):384.e1-384.e11
pubmed: 33039393
J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Jun 27;44(2):e211-e220
pubmed: 34611709
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2147915
pubmed: 35142835