The conservative treatment of congenital scoliosis with hemivertebra: Report of three cases.
bracing
congenital scoliosis (CS)
conservative treatment (CT)
failure of formation
hemivertebra
Journal
Frontiers in pediatrics
ISSN: 2296-2360
Titre abrégé: Front Pediatr
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101615492
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
24
05
2022
accepted:
18
08
2022
entrez:
28
11
2022
pubmed:
29
11
2022
medline:
29
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Scoliosis is the most common type of congenital vertebral disease. This spinal disorder may be due to a failure of formation, segmentation, or a combination thereof. Complete failure of formation causes hemivertebra which can lead to unbalanced growth and deformation. Statistically, 25% of congenital curves do not evolve, 25% progress slightly, while the remaining 50% develop quickly and require treatment. Hemivertebrae can be divided into three types: non-segmented, semi-segmented, and fully-segmented. The fully-segmented types are most likely to progress. Hemivertebra in the thoracolumbar region shows higher rates of progression compared with those in the lumbar area. The treatment may be either conservative or surgical. In general, bracing is not recommended in short and rigid curves, although it may help process secondary curves. To assess the effectiveness of bracing in congenital scoliosis due to hemivertebra. Searching in our database, we found three cases of patients with congenital scoliosis due to fully-segmented hemivertebra. The first of them was 6 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L5, determining an L1-L5 (S1) lumbar curve. The second one was 10 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L2 and a T11-L4 (L5 sacralized) thoracolumbar curve. The last one was 3 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L3 (in six lumbar bodies), determining a thoracolumbar curve T12-L4. We utilized a Milwaukee brace for the first patient, a Boston brace for the second patient, and a Progressive Action Short Brace (PASB) for the third patient. At the beginning of the treatment, the Cobb angles measured 23°, 53°, and 25°, respectively. During treatment, the Cobb angles measured 22°, 35°, and 15°, respectively. At the end of treatment, the Cobb angles measured 18°, 45°, and 12°, respectively. At long-term follow-up, the curves measured 20°, 45°, and 12° Cobb angles, respectively. Comparing our cases with those found in the literature we can confirm the ability of conservative treatment to change the natural history of congenital lumbar scoliosis due to failure of formation. From our experience, in all cases of CS with hemivertebra, before considering a surgical approach, conservative treatment should be implemented as early as possible without waiting for the progressive deformation of the adjacent normal vertebrae.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36440342
doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.951832
pmc: PMC9682117
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
951832Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Caredda, Bandinelli, Falciglia, Giordano and Aulisa.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Pediatr Orthop. 2007 Jan-Feb;27(1):106-16
pubmed: 17195809
J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Mar;38(3):e172-e179
pubmed: 28009797
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 1;34(17):1745-50
pubmed: 19602997
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986 Aug;68(4):588-95
pubmed: 3733836
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;140:310-3
pubmed: 18810043
Eur Spine J. 2003 Oct;12(5):456-63
pubmed: 14618384
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982 Oct;64(8):1128-47
pubmed: 7130226
Childs Nerv Syst. 2018 Nov;34(11):2155-2171
pubmed: 30078055
Curr Pediatr Rev. 2016;12(1):43-7
pubmed: 26769614
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 3;92(15):2533-43
pubmed: 20889912
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 1;34(17):1751-5
pubmed: 19644326
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975 Jun;57(4):456-66
pubmed: 1141254
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 May;469(5):1323-9
pubmed: 20957466
Scoliosis. 2011 Jun 04;6:12
pubmed: 21639924
Eur Spine J. 2016 Feb;25(2):487-94
pubmed: 26160689
J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Oct-Nov;32(7):658-63
pubmed: 22955527
Spine Deform. 2013 Sep;1(5):339-342
pubmed: 27927389
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jan 15;35(2):E49-52
pubmed: 20081501
EFORT Open Rev. 2022 May 05;7(5):318-327
pubmed: 35510738
Eur Spine J. 2018 Jul;27(Suppl 3):533-537
pubmed: 29671107