A deliberative public engagement study on heritable human genome editing among South Africans: Study results.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 22 01 2022
accepted: 15 09 2022
entrez: 28 11 2022
pubmed: 29 11 2022
medline: 1 12 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This paper reports the results of a public engagement study on heritable human genome editing (HHGE) carried out in South Africa, which was conducted in accordance with a study protocol that was published in this journal in 2021. This study is novel as it is the first public engagement study on HHGE in Africa. It used a deliberative public engagement (DPE) methodology, entailing inter alia that measures were put in place to ensure that potential participants became informed about HHGE, and that deliberations between the participants were facilitated with the aim of seeking consensus. A diverse group of 30 persons was selected to participate in the DPE study, which took place via Zoom over three consecutive weekday evenings. The main results are: Provided that HHGE is safe and effective, an overwhelming majority of participants supported allowing the use of HHGE to prevent genetic health conditions and for immunity against TB and HIV/Aids, while significant majorities opposed allowing HHGE for enhancement. The dominant paradigm during the deliberations was balancing health benefits (and associated improvements in quality of life) with unforeseen health risks (such as loss of natural immunity). The seriousness of a health condition emerged as the determining factor for the policy choice of whether to allow an application of HHGE. More generally, equal access to HHGE qua healthcare service featured as an important value, and it was uncontested that the South African government should allocate resources to promote scientific research into HHGE. These results are aligned with the policy principles for regulating HHGE in South Africa suggested by Thaldar et al. They call for urgent revision of South African ethics guidelines that currently prohibit research on HHGE, and for dedicated HHGE legal regulations that provide a clear and comprehensive legal pathway for researchers who intend to conduct HHGE research and clinical trials.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36441783
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275372
pii: PONE-D-22-02146
pmc: PMC9704621
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0275372

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Thaldar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Cell Stem Cell. 2016 May 5;18(5):569-72
pubmed: 27152441
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 1;118(22):
pubmed: 34050014
CRISPR J. 2020 Dec;3(6):434-439
pubmed: 33346718
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2021 Aug;20(8):921-933
pubmed: 34252336
Hum Reprod Open. 2018 May 16;2018(3):hoy008
pubmed: 30895249
Biotechniques. 2000 Oct;29(4):832-6, 838-43
pubmed: 11056815
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 19;16(8):e0256097
pubmed: 34411176
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Jul;57(2):239-51
pubmed: 12765705
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):48-52
pubmed: 24434712
CRISPR J. 2020 Jun;3(3):148-155
pubmed: 33560915
CRISPR J. 2019 Dec;2(6):362-369
pubmed: 31860350
Hum Gene Ther. 2020 Jan;31(1-2):20-46
pubmed: 31802714
Science. 2020 Sep 18;369(6510):1435-1437
pubmed: 32943515
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Oct 6;21(1):95
pubmed: 33023591
Nat Biotechnol. 2017 Nov 9;35(11):1021-1023
pubmed: 29121022
J Med Ethics. 2022 Mar;48(3):165-168
pubmed: 33762299
Account Res. 2008 Oct-Dec;15(4):283-302
pubmed: 18972267
N Biotechnol. 2010 Dec 31;27(6):724-8
pubmed: 20359558
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 17;21(1):2113
pubmed: 34789201
J Hum Genet. 2020 Dec;65(12):1055-1065
pubmed: 32737393
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Nov 25;16(1):712
pubmed: 27887646
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2014 Nov 10;6(1):E1-7
pubmed: 26245416
Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep 1;33(9):1777-1796
pubmed: 30085071

Auteurs

Donrich Thaldar (D)

School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.

Bonginkosi Shozi (B)

School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Institute for Practical Ethics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.

Michaela Steytler (M)

School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.

Gill Hendry (G)

Unaffiliated, South Africa.

Marietjie Botes (M)

School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust, Université du Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

Ntokozo Mnyandu (N)

School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.

Meshandren Naidoo (M)

School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.

Siddharthiya Pillay (S)

School of Management, Information Technology & Governance, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.

Magda Slabbert (M)

College of Law, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.

Beverley Townsend (B)

School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
York Law School, University of York, York, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH