The European baseline series and recommended additions: 2023.
Europe
allergen
baseline series
hapten
patch test
recommended addition
Journal
Contact dermatitis
ISSN: 1600-0536
Titre abrégé: Contact Dermatitis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7604950
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Feb 2023
Historique:
revised:
09
11
2022
received:
05
09
2022
accepted:
23
11
2022
pubmed:
29
11
2022
medline:
14
1
2023
entrez:
28
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The European baseline series was last updated in 2019. This article discusses the reasoning behind a further iteration of the series for 2023.
Substances chimiques
Allergens
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
87-92Subventions
Organisme : European Academy of Dermato-venereology
Informations de copyright
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Wilkinson M, Gonçalo M, Aerts O, et al. The European baseline series and recommended additions: 2019. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;80(1):1-4.
Wilkinson SM, Badulici S, Giménez-Arnau A, et al. The European baseline series: criteria for allergen inclusion (with reference to formaldehyde releasers). Contact Dermatitis. 2021;85(2):125-128.
Uter W, Bauer A, Belloni Fortina A, et al. Patch test results with the European baseline series and additions thereof in the ESSCA network, 2015-2018. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;84(2):109-120.
Uter W, Wilkinson SM, Aerts O, et al. Patch test results with the European Baseline Series, 2019/20 - Joint European results of the ESSCA and the EBS working groups of the ESCD, and the GEIDAC. Contact Dermatitis. 2022;87:343-355. doi:10.1111/cod.14170
Uter W, Wilkinson SM, Aerts O, et al. European patch test results with audit allergens as candidates for inclusion in the European Baseline Series, 2019/20 - joint results of the ESSCA and the EBS working groups of the ESCD, and the GEIDAC. Contact Dermatitis. 2022;86(5):379-389.
Mercader-García P, Pastor-Nieto MA, Gonzalez-Perez R, et al. Should methyldibromo glutaronitrile continue to be used in the European baseline series? A REIDAC national cross-sectional study. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;85(5):572-577.
Accessed February 2021. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32020R1682&from=EN.
Isaksson M, Lindberg M, Sundberg K, Hallander A, Bruze M. The development and course of patch test reactions to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;53(5):292-297.
Uter W, Worm M, Brans R, et al. Patch test results with caine mix III and its three constituents in consecutive patients of the IVDK. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;84(6):481-483.
Geier J, Schubert S, Schnuch A, et al. A negative breakdown test in a fragrance mix I-positive patient does not rule out contact allergy to its fragrance constituents. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;84(6):407-418.
Mann J, McFadden JP, White JM, et al. Baseline series fragrance markers fail to predict contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;70(5):276-281.
Frosch PJ, Pirker C, Rastogi SC, et al. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;52(4):207-215.
Goossens A, Aerts O. Contact allergy to and allergic contact dermatitis from formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers: a clinical review and update. Contact Dermatitis. 2022;87(1):20-27.
Pontén A, Goossens A, Bruze M. Recommendation to include formaldehyde 2.0% aqua in the European baseline patch test series. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;69(6):372-374.
Whitehouse H, Uter W, Geier J, et al. Formaldehyde 2% is not a useful means of detecting allergy to formaldehyde releasers - results of the ESSCA network, 2015-2018. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;84(2):95-102.
Accessed March 26, 2021. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2019.137.01.0029.01.ENG&toc=OJ:L:2019:137:FULL.
Dendooven E, Darrigade AS, Foubert K, et al. The presence of sulfites in ‘natural rubber latex’ and ‘synthetic’ rubber gloves: an experimental pilot study. Br J Dermatol. 2020;182(4):1054-1055.
Grosch E, Mahler V. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by a catheter system containing sodium metabisulfite. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;76(3):186-187.
Febriana SA, Jungbauer F, Soebono H, Coenraads PJ. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis and patch test results of leather workers at two Indonesian tanneries. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;67(5):277-283.
Uter W, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T, et al. The epidemic of methylisothiazolinone contact allergy in Europe: follow-up on changing exposures. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(2):333-339.
King N, Latheef F. Wilkinson SM trends in preservative allergy: benzisothiazolinone emerges from the pack. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;85(6):637-642.
Sasseville D. Alkyl glucosides: 2017 “allergen of the year”. Dermatitis. 2017;28(4):296.
Severin RK, Belsito DV. Patch testing with decyl and lauryl glucoside: how well does one screen for contact allergic reactions to the other? Dermatitis. 2017;28(6):342-345.
Bhoyrul B, Solman L, Kirk S, Orton D, Wilkinson M. Patch testing with alkyl glucosides: concomitant reactions are common but not ubiquitous. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;80(5):286-290.
Horton E, Uter W, Geier J, et al. Developing a cosmetic series: results from the ESSCA network, 2009-2018. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;84(2):82-94.
Bauer A, Geier J, Schreiber S, Schubert S, IVDK. Contact sensitization to plants of the Compositae family: data of the information network of departments of dermatology (IVDK) from 2007 to 2016. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;80(4):222-227.
Paulsen E, Andersen KE. Screening for Compositae contact sensitization with sesquiterpene lactones and Compositae mix 2.5% pet. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;81(5):368-373.
de Groot A. Linalool hydroperoxides. Dermatitis. 2019;30(4):243-246.
de Groot A. Limonene hydroperoxides. Dermatitis. 2019;30(6):331-335.
Ogueta IA, Brared Christensson J, Giménez-Arnau E, et al. Limonene and linalool hydroperoxides review: pros and cons for routine patch testing. Contact Dermatitis. 2022;87(1):1-12.
Natsch A, Nägelin M, Leijs H, et al. Exposure source for skin sensitizing hydroperoxides of limonene and linalool remains elusive: an analytical market surveillance. Food Chem Toxicol. 2019;127:156-162.
Bennike NH, Palangi L, Christensson JB, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by hydroperoxides of limonene and dose-response relationship-a repeated open application test (ROAT) study. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;80(4):208-216.
de Groot A, Gilissen L, Geier J, Orton D, Goossens A. Adding sorbitan sesquioleate to the European baseline series: necessary, reasonable, or unavoidable? Contact Dermatitis. 2019;81(3):221-225.
Stingeni L, Tramontana M, Bianchi L, et al. Patch test with sorbitan sesquioleate in Italian consecutive patients: a 1-year multicenter SIDAPA study. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;81(6):454-456.
Bennike NH, Johansen JD. Sorbitan sesquioleate: a rare cause of contact allergy in consecutively patch tested dermatitis patients. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;74(4):242-245.