The effectiveness of third wave cognitive behavioural therapies for children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
adolescent mental health
child mental health
meta-analysis
third wave cognitive behavioural therapy
Journal
The British journal of clinical psychology
ISSN: 0144-6657
Titre abrégé: Br J Clin Psychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8105533
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
revised:
29
10
2022
received:
25
01
2022
accepted:
02
11
2022
pubmed:
30
11
2022
medline:
10
2
2023
entrez:
29
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Third wave cognitive behavioural therapies are increasingly used with children and adolescents. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of four third-wave interventions (acceptance and commitment therapy, compassion focused therapy, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, and metacognitive therapy) for youth. Four electronic databases were used to identify randomized controlled trials, which tested effects related to health, well-being and functioning. Sensitivity analyses considering study quality were conducted and moderators were explored. The results based on 50 RCTs meeting inclusion criteria indicated emotional symptoms/internalizing problems (g = -.68, 95% CI -.98 to -.37, k = 43, N = 3265), behavioural difficulties/externalizing problems (g = -.62, 95% CI -1.01 to -.22, k = 23, N = 1659), interference from difficulties (g = -.46, 95% CI -.87 to -.05, k = 21, N = 1786), third wave processes (g = .39, 95% CI .17 to .62, k = 22, N = 1900), wellbeing/flourishing (g = .76, 95% CI .35 to 1.17, k = 21, N = 1303) and physical health/pain (g = .72, 95% CI .01 to 1.44, k = 9, N = 1171) yielded significant effects. Effect for quality of life (g = .62, 95% CI -.08 to 1.31, k = 12, N = 1271) was non-significant. When analysing only those studies rated moderate-high quality, third wave interventions yielded significant superiority effects compared to controls for emotional symptoms/internalizing problems (g = -.55, 95% CI -.82 to -.27, k = 28, N = 2110), interference from difficulties (g = -.48, 95% CI -.90 to -.05, k = 21, N = 1605), third wave processes (g = .27, 95% CI .11 to .43, k = 18, N = 1692), well-being/flourishing (g = .50, 95% CI .18 to .81, k = 16, N = 1063), and quality of life (g = .32, 95% CI .04 to .60, k = 10, N = 1212). Behavioural difficulties/externalizing problems (g = -.38, 95% CI -.86 to .10, k = 15, N = 1351) and physical health/pain (g = .52, 95% CI -.14 to 1.17, k = 8, N = 1139) ceased to be significant. Widespread heterogeneity raised concerns about generalizability and follow-up data was relatively sparse. This meta-analysis finds promising results for use of third wave CBT with youth, though the review has limitations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36443910
doi: 10.1111/bjc.12404
pmc: PMC10100516
doi:
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
209-227Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.
Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 18;(2):CD004690
pubmed: 25692403
Perspect Clin Res. 2011 Jul;2(3):109-12
pubmed: 21897887
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Jan 29;9:4
pubmed: 29434552
Behav Modif. 2011 Mar;35(2):187-200
pubmed: 21324946
Pain. 2009 Feb;141(3):248-257
pubmed: 19108951
Behav Ther. 2016 Nov;47(6):869-885
pubmed: 27993338
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
Br J Clin Psychol. 2023 Mar;62(1):209-227
pubmed: 36443910
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;59(1):64-77
pubmed: 31589909
Autism. 2014 Nov;18(8):953-64
pubmed: 24142796
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Jan 22;8(1):15
pubmed: 35065669
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1982 Apr;4(1):33-47
pubmed: 7042457
J Sch Psychol. 2016 Aug;57:41-52
pubmed: 27425565
World Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;16(3):245-246
pubmed: 28941087
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Feb;141(1):2-18
pubmed: 21823805
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Dec;75:60-71
pubmed: 26575979