Optimization framework for patient-specific modeling under uncertainty.

optimization patient-specific modeling reduced order model surrogate model uncertainty quantification

Journal

International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering
ISSN: 2040-7947
Titre abrégé: Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101530293

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2023
Historique:
revised: 12 09 2022
received: 07 02 2022
accepted: 07 11 2022
pubmed: 1 12 2022
medline: 15 2 2023
entrez: 30 11 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Estimating a patient-specific computational model's parameters relies on data that is often unreliable and ill-suited for a deterministic approach. We develop an optimization-based uncertainty quantification framework for probabilistic model tuning that discovers model inputs distributions that generate target output distributions. Probabilistic sampling is performed using a surrogate model for computational efficiency, and a general distribution parameterization is used to describe each input. The approach is tested on seven patient-specific modeling examples using CircAdapt, a cardiovascular circulatory model. Six examples are synthetic, aiming to match the output distributions generated using known reference input data distributions, while the seventh example uses real-world patient data for the output distributions. Our results demonstrate the accurate reproduction of the target output distributions, with a correct recreation of the reference inputs for the six synthetic examples. Our proposed approach is suitable for determining the parameter distributions of patient-specific models with uncertain data and can be used to gain insights into the sensitivity of the model parameters to the measured data.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36448192
doi: 10.1002/cnm.3665
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e3665

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Iman RL, Helton JC. An investigation of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models. Risk Anal. 1988;8(1):71-90.
Walker W, Rotmans J, Janssen P. Defining uncertainty: a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integr Assess. 2003;4(1):5-17.
Neal ML, Kerckhoffs R. Current progress in patient-specific modeling. Brief Bioinform. 2009;11(1):111-126.
Shortliffe EH, Buchanan BG, Feigenbaum EA. Knowledge Engineering for Medical Decision Making: A Review of Computer-Based Clinical Decision Aids. Stanford University Computer Science Department; 1979.
Krishnamurthy A, Villongco CT, Chuang J, et al. Patient-specific models of cardiac biomechanics. J Comput Phys. 2013;244:4-21.
Ellwein LM, Pope SR, Xie A, Batzel J, Kelley CT, Olufsen MS. Modeling cardiovascular and respiratory dynamics in congestive heart failure. Math Biosci. 2013;241:56-74.
Reinbolt JA, Haftka RT, Chmielewski TL, Fregly BJ. A computational framework to predict post-treatment outcome for gait-related disorders. Med Eng Phys. 2008;30:434-443.
Roth GA, Huffman MD, Moran AE, et al. Global and regional patterns in cardiovascular mortality from 1990 to 2013. Circulation. 2015;132(17):1667-1678.
Niederer SA, Fink M, Noble D, Smith NP. A meta-analysis of cardiac electrophysiology computational models. Exp Physiol. 2009;94(5):486-495.
Kerckhoffs RCP, Lumens J, Vernooy K, et al. Cardiac resynchronization: insight from experimental and computational models. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2008;97(2-3):543-561.
Huberts W, Heinen SGH, Zonnebeld N, et al. What is needed to make cardiovascular models suitable for clinical decision support? A viewpoint paper. J Comput Sci. 2018;24:68-84.
Sankaran S, Marsden AL. A stochastic collocation method for uncertainty quantification and propagation in cardiovascular simulations. J Biomed Eng. 2011;133:1-12.
Xiu D, Sherwin SJ. Parametric uncertainty analysis of pulse wave propagation in a model of a human arterial network. J Comput Phys. 2007;226:1385-1407.
Arts T, Delhaas T, Bovendeerd P, Verbeek X, Prinzen FW. Adaptation to mechanical load determines shape and properties of heart and circulation: the CircAdapt model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005;288:H1943-H1954.
Pokuri BSS, Lofquist A, Risko C, Ganapathysubramanian B. Algorithm 1025: PARyOpt: a software for parallel asynchronous remote Bayesian optimization. ACM Trans Math Softw. 2022;48(2):1-15.
Mineroff J, McCulloch AD, Krummen D, Ganapathysubramanian B, Krishnamurthy A. Optimization framework for patient-specific cardiac modeling. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2019;10:553-567.
Gordon EP, Schnittger I, Fitzgerald PJ, Williams P, Popp RL. Reproducibility of left ventricular volumes by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983;2(3):506-513.
Kuikka J, Lehtovirta P, Kuikka E, Rekonen A. Application of the modified gamma function to the calculation of cardiopulmonary blood pools in radiocardiography. Phys Med Biol. 1974;19(5):692-700.
Leifsson L, Koziel S, Kurgan P. Automated low-fidelity model setup for surrogate-based aerodynamic optimization. Solving Computationally Expensive Engineering Problems. Springer; 2014:87-111.
Robinson T, Eldred M, Willcox K, Haimes R. Surrogate-based optimization using multifidelity models with variable parameterization and corrected space mapping. AIAA J. 2008;46(11):2814-2822.
Friedman JH. Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Ann Stat. 1991;19(1):1-67.
De Boor C, Ron A. On multivariate polynomial interpolation. Constr Approx. 1990;6(3):287-302.
Dyn N, Levin D, Rippa S. Numerical procedures for surface fitting of scattered data by radial functions. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput. 1986;7(2):639-659.
Fang H, Horstemeyer MF. Global response approximation with radial basis functions. Eng Optim. 2006;38(4):407-424.
Cressie N. Spatial prediction and ordinary kriging. Math Geol. 1988;20(4):405-421.
Carl Edward R, Christopher KIW. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. Vol 14. MIT Press; 2004.
MathWorks Inc. MATLAB R2021b. MathWorks Inc.; 2021.
Olansen JB, Clark JW, Khoury D, Ghorbel F, Bidani A. A closed-loop model of the canine cardiovascular system that includes ventricular interaction. Comput Biomed Res. 2000;33(4):260-295.
Raamat R, Talts J, Jagomägi K, Kivastik J. Accuracy of some algorithms to determine the oscillometric mean arterial pressure: a theoretical study. Blood Press Monit. 2013;18:50-56.
Clay S, Alfakih K, Radjenovic A, Jones T, Ridgway JP, Sinvananthan MU. Normal range of human left ventricular volumes and mass using steady state free precession MRI in the radial long axis orientation. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med. 2006;19(1):41-45.
Ribezzo S, Spina E, Di Bartolomeo S, Sanson G. Noninvasive techniques for blood pressure measurement are not a reliable alternative to direct measurement: a randomized crossover trial in ICU. Sci World J. 2014;2014:1-8.
Zabaras N, Ganapathysubramanian B. A scalable framework for the solution of stochastic inverse problems using a sparse grid collocation approach. J Comput Phys. 2008;227(9):4697-4735.

Auteurs

Joshua Mineroff (J)

Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.

Balaji Sesha Sarath Pokuri (BSS)

Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.

Baskar Ganapathysubramanian (B)

Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.

Adarsh Krishnamurthy (A)

Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH